mirror of
https://github.com/apple/swift.git
synced 2025-12-14 20:36:38 +01:00
b96aedaf64
The patch that nailed down our semantics here missed an additional case that
required a compatibility hack: a property on a generic type and a same-named one
in an (unconstrained) extension:
struct Foo<T> {
var x: Int { return 0 }
}
extension Foo {
var x: Bool { return false }
}
Fixes rdar://problem/40685642.
25 lines
999 B
Swift
25 lines
999 B
Swift
// RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift -swift-version 5
|
|
|
|
struct SR7251<T> {
|
|
struct j {} // expected-note {{previously declared here}}
|
|
static var k: Int { return 0 } // expected-note {{previously declared here}}
|
|
}
|
|
extension SR7251 {
|
|
static var i: Int { return 0 } // expected-note {{previously declared here}}
|
|
struct i {} // expected-error{{invalid redeclaration of 'i'}}
|
|
static var j: Int { return 0 } // expected-error{{invalid redeclaration of 'j'}}
|
|
struct k {} // expected-error{{invalid redeclaration of 'k'}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
struct SR7249<T> {
|
|
var x: T { fatalError() } // expected-note {{previously declared}}
|
|
var y: Int // expected-note {{previously declared}}
|
|
var z: Int // expected-note {{previously declared}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
extension SR7249 {
|
|
var x: Int { fatalError() } // expected-error{{invalid redeclaration of 'x'}}
|
|
var y: T { fatalError() } // expected-error{{invalid redeclaration of 'y'}}
|
|
var z: Int { fatalError() } // expected-error{{invalid redeclaration of 'z'}}
|
|
}
|