Files
swift-mirror/utils/incrparse/test_util.py
Saleem Abdulrasool 162c5e1bc7 test: explicitly encode arguments for Python 3
The argument handling for `subprocess.check_output` differs between
Python 2.7, [3.0, 3.6], [3.7).

With Python 2.7, the list is implicitly decoded and we cannot use the
`encode` method as it will attempt to decode it as ASCII which will fail
with unicode data.

Python [3.0, 3.6] will attempt to encode the arguments before executing,
but will do so based on the system locale.  In the case that the locale
is `POSIX`, the encoding will be attempted in ASCII, which again fails
when unicode data is used.

Python [3.7) will accept the encoded strings and pass them through.  It
will implicitly encode the arguments using the file system encoding
(normally UTF-8), which will allow it to actually work with the content
encoded or decoded.

In order to provide maximal compatibility, pre-encode the arguments as
UTF-8 when using python 3.  Rely on the interpreter encoding the
argument implicitly on Python 2.  This allows running the
incrParse.simple test with python 2.7, python 3.6, python 3.7, python
3.8 with `LC_ALL=POSIX` as is the default on Ubuntu Server.

Thanks to @tbkka for the details on how to reproduce this issue and the
help with the python conversion!
2020-07-31 15:51:49 +00:00

350 lines
14 KiB
Python
Executable File

#!/usr/bin/env python
from __future__ import print_function
import argparse
import io
import os
import re
import subprocess
import sys
class TestFailedError(Exception):
pass
def escapeCmdArg(arg):
if '"' in arg or ' ' in arg:
return '"%s"' % arg.replace('"', '\\"')
else:
return arg
def run_command(cmd):
if sys.version_info[0] < 3:
cmd = list(map(lambda s: s.encode('utf-8'), cmd))
print(' '.join([escapeCmdArg(arg) for arg in cmd]))
if sys.version_info[0] < 3:
return subprocess.check_output(cmd, stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
else:
return subprocess.check_output(list(map(lambda s: s.encode('utf-8'), cmd)),
stderr=subprocess.STDOUT)
def parseLine(line, line_no, test_case, incremental_edit_args, reparse_args,
current_reparse_start):
pre_edit_line = ""
post_edit_line = ""
# We parse one tag at a time in the line while eating away a prefix of the
# line
while line:
# The regular expression to match the template markers
subst_re = re.compile(r'^(.*?)<<(.*?)<(.*?)\|\|\|(.*?)>>>(.*\n?)')
reparse_re = re.compile(r'^(.*?)<(/?)reparse ?(.*?)>(.*\n?)')
subst_match = subst_re.match(line)
reparse_match = reparse_re.match(line)
if subst_match and reparse_match:
# If both regex match use the one with the shorter prefix
if len(subst_match.group(1)) < len(reparse_match.group(1)):
reparse_match = None
else:
subst_match = None
if subst_match:
prefix = subst_match.group(1)
match_test_case = subst_match.group(2)
pre_edit = subst_match.group(3)
post_edit = subst_match.group(4)
suffix = subst_match.group(5)
if match_test_case == test_case:
# Compute the -incremental-edit argument for swift-syntax-test
column = len(pre_edit_line) + len(prefix) + 1
edit_arg = '%d:%d-%d:%d=%s' % \
(line_no, column, line_no, column + len(pre_edit.encode('utf-8')),
post_edit)
incremental_edit_args.append('-incremental-edit')
incremental_edit_args.append(edit_arg)
pre_edit_line += prefix + pre_edit
post_edit_line += prefix + post_edit
else:
# For different test cases just take the pre-edit text
pre_edit_line += prefix + pre_edit
post_edit_line += prefix + pre_edit
line = suffix
elif reparse_match:
prefix = reparse_match.group(1)
is_closing = len(reparse_match.group(2)) > 0
match_test_case = reparse_match.group(3)
suffix = reparse_match.group(4)
if match_test_case == test_case:
column = len(post_edit_line) + len(prefix) + 1
if is_closing:
if not current_reparse_start:
raise TestFailedError('Closing unopened reparse tag '
'in line %d' % line_no)
reparse_args.append('-reparse-region')
reparse_args.append(
'%d:%d-%d:%d' % (current_reparse_start[0],
current_reparse_start[1],
line_no, column))
current_reparse_start = None
else:
if current_reparse_start:
raise TestFailedError('Opening nested reparse tags '
'for the same test case in line '
'%d' % line_no)
current_reparse_start = [line_no, column]
pre_edit_line += prefix
post_edit_line += prefix
line = suffix
else:
pre_edit_line += line
post_edit_line += line
# Nothing more to do
line = ''
return (pre_edit_line.encode('utf-8'),
post_edit_line.encode('utf-8'),
current_reparse_start)
def prepareForIncrParse(test_file, test_case, pre_edit_file, post_edit_file,
incremental_edit_args, reparse_args):
with io.open(test_file, mode='r', encoding='utf-8',
newline='\n') as test_file_handle, \
io.open(pre_edit_file, mode='w+', encoding='utf-8',
newline='\n') as pre_edit_file_handle, \
io.open(post_edit_file, mode='w+', encoding='utf-8',
newline='\n') as post_edit_file_handle:
current_reparse_start = None
line_no = 1
for line in test_file_handle.readlines():
parseLineRes = parseLine(line, line_no, test_case,
incremental_edit_args,
reparse_args, current_reparse_start)
(pre_edit_line, post_edit_line, current_reparse_start) = \
parseLineRes
pre_edit_file_handle.write(pre_edit_line.decode('utf-8'))
post_edit_file_handle.write(post_edit_line.decode('utf-8'))
line_no += 1
if current_reparse_start:
raise TestFailedError('Unclosed reparse tag for test case %s' %
test_case)
def serializeIncrParseMarkupFile(test_file, test_case, mode,
serialization_mode, serialization_format,
omit_node_ids, output_file, diags_output_file,
temp_dir, swift_syntax_test,
print_visual_reuse_info):
test_file_name = os.path.basename(test_file)
pre_edit_file = temp_dir + '/' + test_file_name + '.' + test_case + \
'.pre.swift'
post_edit_file = temp_dir + '/' + test_file_name + '.' + test_case + \
'.post.swift'
if not os.path.exists(temp_dir):
os.makedirs(temp_dir)
# =========================================================================
# First generate the pre-edit and post-edit Swift file and gather the edits
# and expected reparse regions. This is the parser for the special edit
# markup for testing incremental parsing
# =========================================================================
# Gather command line arguments for swift-syntax-test specifiying the
# performed edits in this list
incremental_edit_args = []
reparse_args = []
prepareForIncrParse(test_file, test_case, pre_edit_file, post_edit_file,
incremental_edit_args, reparse_args)
# =========================================================================
# Now generate the requested serialized file
# =========================================================================
# Build the command to serialize the tree depending on the command line
# arguments
try:
command = [
swift_syntax_test,
'-serialize-raw-tree',
'-output-filename', output_file
]
if diags_output_file:
command.extend(['-diags-output-filename', diags_output_file])
if omit_node_ids:
command.extend(['-omit-node-ids'])
if serialization_mode == 'full':
# Nothing to do. This is the default behaviour of swift-syntax-test
pass
elif serialization_mode == 'incremental':
command.extend(['-incremental-serialization'])
else:
raise ValueError('Unknown serialization mode "%s"' %
serialization_mode)
if serialization_format == 'json':
# Nothing to do. This is the default behaviour of swift-syntax-test
pass
elif serialization_format == 'byteTree':
command.extend(['-serialize-byte-tree'])
else:
raise ValueError('Unknown serialization format "%s"' %
serialization_format)
if mode == 'pre-edit':
command.extend(['-input-source-filename', pre_edit_file])
elif mode == 'post-edit':
command.extend(['-input-source-filename', post_edit_file])
elif mode == 'incremental':
# We need to build the syntax tree of the pre-edit file first so
# that we can pass it to swift-syntax-test to perform incremental
# parsing
pre_edit_tree_file = pre_edit_file + '.serialized.json'
run_command([swift_syntax_test] +
['-serialize-raw-tree'] +
['-input-source-filename', pre_edit_file] +
['-output-filename', pre_edit_tree_file])
# Then perform incremental parsing with the old syntax tree on the
# post-edit file
command.extend(['-input-source-filename', post_edit_file])
command.extend(['-old-syntax-tree-filename',
pre_edit_tree_file])
command.extend(['--old-source-filename', pre_edit_file])
command.extend(incremental_edit_args)
command.extend(reparse_args)
if print_visual_reuse_info:
command.extend([
'-print-visual-reuse-info',
'-force-colored-output'
])
else:
raise ValueError('Unknown mode "%s"' % mode)
output = run_command(command)
if print_visual_reuse_info:
print(output)
except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
raise TestFailedError(e.output.decode('utf-8'))
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(
formatter_class=argparse.RawDescriptionHelpFormatter,
description='Utility for testing incremental syntax parsing',
epilog='''
This utility can parse a special markup to dedicate a pre-edit and a
post-edit version of a file simulateously and generate a serialized version
of the libSyntax tree by parsing either the pre-edit file, the post-edit
file or the edits that are required to retrieve the post-edit file from the
pre-edit file incrementally.
To generate the pre-edit and the post-edit file from the template, it
operates on markers of the form:
<<test_case<pre|||post>>>
These placeholders are replaced by:
- 'pre' if a different test case than 'test_case' is run
- 'pre' for the pre-edit version of 'test_case'
- 'post' for the post-edit version of 'test_case''')
parser.add_argument(
'file', type=argparse.FileType(),
help='The template file to test')
parser.add_argument(
'--test-case', default='',
help='The test case to execute. If no test case is specified all \
unnamed substitutions are applied')
parser.add_argument(
'--mode', choices=['pre-edit', 'incremental', 'post-edit'],
required=True, help='''
The type of parsing to perform:
- pre-edit: Serialize the syntax tree when parsing the pre-edit file \
from scratch
- incremental: Serialize the syntax tree that results from parsing the \
edits between the pre-edit and post-edit file incrementally
- post-edit: Serialize the syntax tree that results from parsing the \
post-edit file from scratch
''')
parser.add_argument(
'--serialization-mode', choices=['full', 'incremental'],
default='full', help='''
Only applicable if `--mode` is `incremental`. Whether to serialize the
entire tree or use the incremental transfer mode. Default is `full`.
''')
parser.add_argument(
'--serialization-format', choices=['json', 'byteTree'],
default='json', help='''
The format in which the syntax tree shall be serialized.
''')
parser.add_argument(
'--omit-node-ids', default=False, action='store_true',
help='Don\'t include the ids of the nodes in the serialized syntax \
tree')
parser.add_argument(
'--output-file', required=True,
help='The file to which the serialized tree shall be written.')
parser.add_argument(
'--temp-dir', required=True,
help='A temporary directory where pre-edit and post-edit files can be \
saved')
parser.add_argument(
'--swift-syntax-test', required=True,
help='The path to swift-syntax-test')
parser.add_argument(
'--print-visual-reuse-info', default=False, action='store_true',
help='Print visual reuse information about the incremental parse \
instead of diffing the syntax trees. This option is intended \
for debug purposes only.')
args = parser.parse_args(sys.argv[1:])
test_file = args.file.name
test_case = args.test_case
mode = args.mode
serialization_mode = args.serialization_mode
serialization_format = args.serialization_format
omit_node_ids = args.omit_node_ids
output_file = args.output_file
temp_dir = args.temp_dir
swift_syntax_test = args.swift_syntax_test
visual_reuse_info = args.print_visual_reuse_info
try:
serializeIncrParseMarkupFile(test_file=test_file,
test_case=test_case,
mode=mode,
serialization_mode=serialization_mode,
serialization_format=serialization_format,
omit_node_ids=omit_node_ids,
output_file=output_file,
diags_output_file=None,
temp_dir=temp_dir,
swift_syntax_test=swift_syntax_test,
print_visual_reuse_info=visual_reuse_info)
except TestFailedError as e:
print(e.message, file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()