mirror of
https://github.com/apple/swift.git
synced 2026-03-04 18:24:35 +01:00
The premise of CopyForwarding was that memory locations have their own ownership lifetime. We knew this was unmaintainable at the time, and that was the original incentive for SIL opaque values, aided by OSSA. In the meantime, we've been relying on SILGen producing reasonable SIL patterns. Unfortunately, the CopyForwarding pass is still with us while we make major changes to SIL ownership patterns and agressively optimize ownership. That introduces risk. Ultimately, the entire CopyForwarding pass should be redesigned for OSSA-only and destroy hoisting should be a simple OSSA utility where most of the work is done by AccessPath::collectUses. But in the meantime, we should remove the source of risk by limiting the CopyForwarding pass to OSSA. Any performance regressions will be recovered as OSSA moves later in the pipeline. After that, opaque values will improve even more over the current state by handling generic SIL using the more powerful CopyPropagation pass. Fixes rdar://71584600 (miscompile in CopyForwarding's release hoisting) Here's an example of the kind of SIL the CopyForwarding does not anticipate (although it only actually miscompiles in much more obscure scenarios, which is why it's so dangerous): bb0(%0 : $AnyObject): %alloc1 = alloc_stack $AnyObject store %0 to %objaddr : $*AnyObject %ref = load %objaddr : $*AnyObject %alloc2 = alloc_stack $ObjWrapper # The in-memory reference is destroyed before retaining the loaded ref. copy_addr [take] %alloc1 to [initialization] %alloc2 : $*ObjWrapper retain_value %ref : $AnyObject
57 KiB
57 KiB