Files
swift-mirror/lib/AST/RequirementMachine/PropertyUnification.cpp
Slava Pestov 2f2249cef1 RequirementMachine: Fix various RewriteSteps to work when re-contextualized
When a rewrite rule is replaced with a path containing ::Adjust, ::Decompose,
::ConcreteConformance or ::SuperclassConformance rewrite steps, the steps
will get a non-zero EndOffset if the original rule appears in a step with a
non-zero EndOffset.

For this reason, these steps must work with a non-zero EndOffset, which
primarily means computing correct offsets into the term being manipulated.
2021-12-08 00:53:35 -05:00

799 lines
27 KiB
C++

//===--- PropertyUnification.cpp - Rules added w/ building property map ---===//
//
// This source file is part of the Swift.org open source project
//
// Copyright (c) 2021 Apple Inc. and the Swift project authors
// Licensed under Apache License v2.0 with Runtime Library Exception
//
// See https://swift.org/LICENSE.txt for license information
// See https://swift.org/CONTRIBUTORS.txt for the list of Swift project authors
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This implements the PropertyBag::addProperty() method, which merges layout,
// superclass and concrete type requirements. This merging can create new rules;
// property map construction is iterated with the Knuth-Bendix completion
// procedure until fixed point.
//
// This file also implements "nested type concretization", which introduces
// concrete type requirements on nested types of type parameters which are
// subject to both a protocol conformance and a concrete type (or superclass)
// requirement.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "swift/AST/Decl.h"
#include "swift/AST/LayoutConstraint.h"
#include "swift/AST/Module.h"
#include "swift/AST/ProtocolConformance.h"
#include "swift/AST/TypeMatcher.h"
#include "swift/AST/Types.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <algorithm>
#include <vector>
#include "PropertyMap.h"
using namespace swift;
using namespace rewriting;
/// This method takes a concrete type that was derived from a concrete type
/// produced by RewriteSystemBuilder::getConcreteSubstitutionSchema(),
/// either by extracting a structural sub-component or performing a (Swift AST)
/// substitution using subst(). It returns a new concrete substitution schema
/// and a new list of substitution terms.
///
/// For example, suppose we start with the concrete type
///
/// Dictionary<τ_0_0, Array<τ_0_1>> with substitutions {X.Y, Z}
///
/// We can extract out the structural sub-component Array<τ_0_1>. If we wish
/// to build a new concrete substitution schema, we call this method with
/// Array<τ_0_1> and the original substitutions {X.Y, Z}. This will produce
/// the new schema Array<τ_0_0> with substitutions {Z}.
///
/// As another example, consider we start with the schema Bar<τ_0_0> with
/// original substitutions {X.Y}, and perform a Swift AST subst() to get
/// Foo<τ_0_0.A.B>. We can then call this method with Foo<τ_0_0.A.B> and
/// the original substitutions {X.Y} to produce the new schema Foo<τ_0_0>
/// with substitutions {X.Y.A.B}.
static CanType
remapConcreteSubstitutionSchema(CanType concreteType,
ArrayRef<Term> substitutions,
RewriteContext &ctx,
SmallVectorImpl<Term> &result) {
assert(!concreteType->isTypeParameter() && "Must have a concrete type here");
if (!concreteType->hasTypeParameter())
return concreteType;
return CanType(concreteType.transformRec([&](Type t) -> Optional<Type> {
if (!t->isTypeParameter())
return None;
auto term = ctx.getRelativeTermForType(CanType(t), substitutions);
unsigned newIndex = result.size();
result.push_back(Term::get(term, ctx));
return CanGenericTypeParamType::get(/*type sequence=*/ false,
/*depth=*/ 0, newIndex,
ctx.getASTContext());
}));
}
namespace {
/// Utility class used by unifyConcreteTypes() and unifySuperclasses()
/// to walk two concrete types in parallel. Any time there is a mismatch,
/// records a new induced rule.
class ConcreteTypeMatcher : public TypeMatcher<ConcreteTypeMatcher> {
ArrayRef<Term> lhsSubstitutions;
ArrayRef<Term> rhsSubstitutions;
RewriteContext &ctx;
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules;
bool debug;
public:
ConcreteTypeMatcher(ArrayRef<Term> lhsSubstitutions,
ArrayRef<Term> rhsSubstitutions,
RewriteContext &ctx,
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules,
bool debug)
: lhsSubstitutions(lhsSubstitutions),
rhsSubstitutions(rhsSubstitutions),
ctx(ctx), inducedRules(inducedRules), debug(debug) {}
bool alwaysMismatchTypeParameters() const { return true; }
bool mismatch(TypeBase *firstType, TypeBase *secondType,
Type sugaredFirstType) {
bool firstAbstract = firstType->isTypeParameter();
bool secondAbstract = secondType->isTypeParameter();
if (firstAbstract && secondAbstract) {
// Both sides are type parameters; add a same-type requirement.
auto lhsTerm = ctx.getRelativeTermForType(CanType(firstType),
lhsSubstitutions);
auto rhsTerm = ctx.getRelativeTermForType(CanType(secondType),
rhsSubstitutions);
if (lhsTerm != rhsTerm) {
if (debug) {
llvm::dbgs() << "%% Induced rule " << lhsTerm
<< " == " << rhsTerm << "\n";
}
inducedRules.emplace_back(lhsTerm, rhsTerm);
}
return true;
}
if (firstAbstract && !secondAbstract) {
// A type parameter is equated with a concrete type; add a concrete
// type requirement.
auto subjectTerm = ctx.getRelativeTermForType(CanType(firstType),
lhsSubstitutions);
SmallVector<Term, 3> result;
auto concreteType = remapConcreteSubstitutionSchema(CanType(secondType),
rhsSubstitutions,
ctx, result);
MutableTerm constraintTerm(subjectTerm);
constraintTerm.add(Symbol::forConcreteType(concreteType, result, ctx));
if (debug) {
llvm::dbgs() << "%% Induced rule " << subjectTerm
<< " == " << constraintTerm << "\n";
}
inducedRules.emplace_back(subjectTerm, constraintTerm);
return true;
}
if (!firstAbstract && secondAbstract) {
// A concrete type is equated with a type parameter; add a concrete
// type requirement.
auto subjectTerm = ctx.getRelativeTermForType(CanType(secondType),
rhsSubstitutions);
SmallVector<Term, 3> result;
auto concreteType = remapConcreteSubstitutionSchema(CanType(firstType),
lhsSubstitutions,
ctx, result);
MutableTerm constraintTerm(subjectTerm);
constraintTerm.add(Symbol::forConcreteType(concreteType, result, ctx));
if (debug) {
llvm::dbgs() << "%% Induced rule " << subjectTerm
<< " == " << constraintTerm << "\n";
}
inducedRules.emplace_back(subjectTerm, constraintTerm);
return true;
}
// Any other kind of type mismatch involves conflicting concrete types on
// both sides, which can only happen on invalid input.
return false;
}
};
}
/// When a type parameter has two concrete types, we have to unify the
/// type constructor arguments.
///
/// For example, suppose that we have two concrete same-type requirements:
///
/// T == Foo<X.Y, Z, String>
/// T == Foo<Int, A.B, W>
///
/// These lower to the following two rules:
///
/// T.[concrete: Foo<τ_0_0, τ_0_1, String> with {X.Y, Z}] => T
/// T.[concrete: Foo<Int, τ_0_0, τ_0_1> with {A.B, W}] => T
///
/// The two concrete type symbols will be added to the property bag of 'T',
/// and we will eventually end up in this method, where we will generate three
/// induced rules:
///
/// X.Y.[concrete: Int] => X.Y
/// A.B => Z
/// W.[concrete: String] => W
///
/// Returns the left hand side on success (it could also return the right hand
/// side; since we unified the type constructor arguments, it doesn't matter).
///
/// Returns true if a conflict was detected.
static bool unifyConcreteTypes(
Symbol lhs, Symbol rhs, RewriteContext &ctx,
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules,
bool debug) {
auto lhsType = lhs.getConcreteType();
auto rhsType = rhs.getConcreteType();
if (debug) {
llvm::dbgs() << "% Unifying " << lhs << " with " << rhs << "\n";
}
ConcreteTypeMatcher matcher(lhs.getSubstitutions(),
rhs.getSubstitutions(),
ctx, inducedRules, debug);
if (!matcher.match(lhsType, rhsType)) {
// FIXME: Diagnose the conflict
if (debug) {
llvm::dbgs() << "%% Concrete type conflict\n";
}
return true;
}
return false;
}
/// When a type parameter has two superclasses, we have to both unify the
/// type constructor arguments, and record the most derived superclass.
///
/// For example, if we have this setup:
///
/// class Base<T, T> {}
/// class Middle<U> : Base<T, T> {}
/// class Derived : Middle<Int> {}
///
/// T : Base<U, V>
/// T : Derived
///
/// The most derived superclass requirement is 'T : Derived'.
///
/// The corresponding superclass of 'Derived' is 'Base<Int, Int>', so we
/// unify the type constructor arguments of 'Base<U, V>' and 'Base<Int, Int>',
/// which generates two induced rules:
///
/// U.[concrete: Int] => U
/// V.[concrete: Int] => V
///
/// Returns the most derived superclass, which becomes the new superclass
/// that gets recorded in the property map.
static Symbol unifySuperclasses(
Symbol lhs, Symbol rhs, RewriteContext &ctx,
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules,
bool debug) {
if (debug) {
llvm::dbgs() << "% Unifying " << lhs << " with " << rhs << "\n";
}
auto lhsType = lhs.getSuperclass();
auto rhsType = rhs.getSuperclass();
auto *lhsClass = lhsType.getClassOrBoundGenericClass();
assert(lhsClass != nullptr);
auto *rhsClass = rhsType.getClassOrBoundGenericClass();
assert(rhsClass != nullptr);
// First, establish the invariant that lhsClass is either equal to, or
// is a superclass of rhsClass.
if (lhsClass == rhsClass ||
lhsClass->isSuperclassOf(rhsClass)) {
// Keep going.
} else if (rhsClass->isSuperclassOf(lhsClass)) {
std::swap(rhs, lhs);
std::swap(rhsType, lhsType);
std::swap(rhsClass, lhsClass);
} else {
// FIXME: Diagnose the conflict.
if (debug) {
llvm::dbgs() << "%% Unrelated superclass types\n";
}
return lhs;
}
if (lhsClass != rhsClass) {
// Get the corresponding substitutions for the right hand side.
assert(lhsClass->isSuperclassOf(rhsClass));
rhsType = rhsType->getSuperclassForDecl(lhsClass)
->getCanonicalType();
}
// Unify type contructor arguments.
ConcreteTypeMatcher matcher(lhs.getSubstitutions(),
rhs.getSubstitutions(),
ctx, inducedRules, debug);
if (!matcher.match(lhsType, rhsType)) {
if (debug) {
llvm::dbgs() << "%% Superclass conflict\n";
}
return rhs;
}
// Record the more specific class.
return rhs;
}
void PropertyBag::addProperty(
Symbol property, unsigned ruleID, RewriteContext &ctx,
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules,
bool debug) {
switch (property.getKind()) {
case Symbol::Kind::Protocol:
ConformsTo.push_back(property.getProtocol());
ConformsToRules.push_back(ruleID);
return;
case Symbol::Kind::Layout:
if (!Layout) {
Layout = property.getLayoutConstraint();
LayoutRule = ruleID;
} else
Layout = Layout.merge(property.getLayoutConstraint());
return;
case Symbol::Kind::Superclass: {
// FIXME: Also handle superclass vs concrete
if (Superclass) {
Superclass = unifySuperclasses(*Superclass, property,
ctx, inducedRules, debug);
} else {
Superclass = property;
SuperclassRule = ruleID;
}
return;
}
case Symbol::Kind::ConcreteType: {
if (ConcreteType) {
(void) unifyConcreteTypes(*ConcreteType, property,
ctx, inducedRules, debug);
} else {
ConcreteType = property;
ConcreteTypeRule = ruleID;
}
return;
}
case Symbol::Kind::ConcreteConformance:
// FIXME
return;
case Symbol::Kind::Name:
case Symbol::Kind::GenericParam:
case Symbol::Kind::AssociatedType:
break;
}
llvm_unreachable("Bad symbol kind");
}
/// For each fully-concrete type, find the shortest term having that concrete type.
/// This is later used by computeConstraintTermForTypeWitness().
void PropertyMap::computeConcreteTypeInDomainMap() {
for (const auto &props : Entries) {
if (!props->isConcreteType())
continue;
auto concreteType = props->ConcreteType->getConcreteType();
if (concreteType->hasTypeParameter())
continue;
assert(props->ConcreteType->getSubstitutions().empty());
auto domain = props->Key.getRootProtocols();
auto concreteTypeKey = std::make_pair(concreteType, domain);
auto found = ConcreteTypeInDomainMap.find(concreteTypeKey);
if (found != ConcreteTypeInDomainMap.end())
continue;
auto inserted = ConcreteTypeInDomainMap.insert(
std::make_pair(concreteTypeKey, props->Key));
assert(inserted.second);
(void) inserted;
}
}
void PropertyMap::concretizeNestedTypesFromConcreteParents(
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules) const {
for (const auto &props : Entries) {
if (props->getConformsTo().empty())
continue;
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
if (props->isConcreteType() ||
props->hasSuperclassBound()) {
llvm::dbgs() << "^ Concretizing nested types of ";
props->dump(llvm::dbgs());
llvm::dbgs() << "\n";
}
}
if (props->isConcreteType()) {
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "- via concrete type requirement\n";
}
concretizeNestedTypesFromConcreteParent(
props->getKey(),
RequirementKind::SameType,
props->ConcreteType->getConcreteType(),
props->ConcreteType->getSubstitutions(),
props->getConformsTo(),
props->ConcreteConformances,
inducedRules);
}
if (props->hasSuperclassBound()) {
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "- via superclass requirement\n";
}
concretizeNestedTypesFromConcreteParent(
props->getKey(),
RequirementKind::Superclass,
props->Superclass->getSuperclass(),
props->Superclass->getSubstitutions(),
props->getConformsTo(),
props->SuperclassConformances,
inducedRules);
}
}
}
/// Suppose a same-type requirement merges two property bags,
/// one of which has a conformance requirement to P and the other
/// one has a concrete type or superclass requirement.
///
/// If the concrete type or superclass conforms to P and P has an
/// associated type A, then we need to infer an equivalence between
/// T.[P:A] and whatever the type witness for 'A' is in the
/// concrete conformance.
///
/// For example, suppose we have a the following definitions,
///
/// protocol Q { associatedtype V }
/// protocol P { associatedtype A; associatedtype C }
/// struct Foo<A, B : Q> : P {
/// typealias C = B.V
/// }
///
/// together with the following property bag:
///
/// T => { conforms_to: [ P ], concrete: Foo<Int, τ_0_0> with <U> }
///
/// The type witness for A in the conformance Foo<Int, τ_0_0> : P is
/// the concrete type 'Int', which induces the following rule:
///
/// T.[P:A].[concrete: Int] => T.[P:A]
///
/// Whereas the type witness for B in the same conformance is the
/// abstract type 'τ_0_0.V', which via the substitutions <U> corresponds
/// to the term 'U.V', and therefore induces the following rule:
///
/// T.[P:B] => U.V
///
void PropertyMap::concretizeNestedTypesFromConcreteParent(
Term key, RequirementKind requirementKind,
CanType concreteType, ArrayRef<Term> substitutions,
ArrayRef<const ProtocolDecl *> conformsTo,
llvm::TinyPtrVector<ProtocolConformance *> &conformances,
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules) const {
assert(requirementKind == RequirementKind::SameType ||
requirementKind == RequirementKind::Superclass);
for (auto *proto : conformsTo) {
// FIXME: Either remove the ModuleDecl entirely from conformance lookup,
// or pass the correct one down in here.
auto *module = proto->getParentModule();
auto conformance = module->lookupConformance(concreteType,
const_cast<ProtocolDecl *>(proto));
if (conformance.isInvalid()) {
// FIXME: Diagnose conflict
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "^^ " << concreteType << " does not conform to "
<< proto->getName() << "\n";
}
continue;
}
// FIXME: Maybe this can happen if the concrete type is an
// opaque result type?
assert(!conformance.isAbstract());
auto *concrete = conformance.getConcrete();
// Record the conformance for use by
// PropertyBag::getConformsToExcludingSuperclassConformances().
conformances.push_back(concrete);
auto assocTypes = proto->getAssociatedTypeMembers();
if (assocTypes.empty())
continue;
for (auto *assocType : assocTypes) {
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "^^ " << "Looking up type witness for "
<< proto->getName() << ":" << assocType->getName()
<< " on " << concreteType << "\n";
}
auto t = concrete->getTypeWitness(assocType);
if (!t) {
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "^^ " << "Type witness for " << assocType->getName()
<< " of " << concreteType << " could not be inferred\n";
}
t = ErrorType::get(concreteType);
}
auto typeWitness = t->getCanonicalType();
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "^^ " << "Type witness for " << assocType->getName()
<< " of " << concreteType << " is " << typeWitness << "\n";
}
MutableTerm subjectType(key);
subjectType.add(Symbol::forAssociatedType(proto, assocType->getName(),
Context));
MutableTerm constraintType;
auto simplify = [&](CanType t) -> CanType {
return CanType(t.transformRec([&](Type t) -> Optional<Type> {
if (!t->isTypeParameter())
return None;
auto term = Context.getRelativeTermForType(t->getCanonicalType(),
substitutions);
System.simplify(term);
return Context.getTypeForTerm(term, { });
}));
};
if (simplify(concreteType) == simplify(typeWitness) &&
requirementKind == RequirementKind::SameType) {
// FIXME: ConcreteTypeInDomainMap should support substitutions so
// that we can remove this.
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "^^ Type witness is the same as the concrete type\n";
}
// Add a rule T.[P:A] => T.
constraintType = MutableTerm(key);
} else {
constraintType = computeConstraintTermForTypeWitness(
key, concreteType, typeWitness, subjectType,
substitutions);
}
inducedRules.emplace_back(subjectType, constraintType);
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "^^ Induced rule " << constraintType
<< " => " << subjectType << "\n";
}
}
}
}
/// Given the key of a property bag known to have \p concreteType,
/// together with a \p typeWitness from a conformance on that concrete
/// type, return the right hand side of a rewrite rule to relate
/// \p subjectType with a term representing the type witness.
///
/// Suppose the key is T and the subject type is T.[P:A].
///
/// If the type witness is an abstract type U, this produces a rewrite
/// rule
///
/// T.[P:A] => U
///
/// If the type witness is a concrete type Foo, this produces a rewrite
/// rule
///
/// T.[P:A].[concrete: Foo] => T.[P:A]
///
/// However, this also tries to tie off recursion first using a heuristic.
///
/// If the type witness is fully concrete and we've already seen some
/// term V in the same domain with the same concrete type, we produce a
/// rewrite rule:
///
/// T.[P:A] => V
MutableTerm PropertyMap::computeConstraintTermForTypeWitness(
Term key, CanType concreteType, CanType typeWitness,
const MutableTerm &subjectType, ArrayRef<Term> substitutions) const {
if (!typeWitness->hasTypeParameter()) {
// Check if we have a shorter representative we can use.
auto domain = key.getRootProtocols();
auto concreteTypeKey = std::make_pair(typeWitness, domain);
auto found = ConcreteTypeInDomainMap.find(concreteTypeKey);
if (found != ConcreteTypeInDomainMap.end()) {
MutableTerm result(found->second);
if (result != subjectType) {
if (Debug.contains(DebugFlags::ConcretizeNestedTypes)) {
llvm::dbgs() << "^^ Type witness can re-use property bag of "
<< found->second << "\n";
}
return result;
}
}
}
if (typeWitness->isTypeParameter()) {
// The type witness is a type parameter of the form τ_0_n.X.Y...Z,
// where 'n' is an index into the substitution array.
//
// Add a rule T => S.X.Y...Z, where S is the nth substitution term.
return Context.getRelativeTermForType(typeWitness, substitutions);
}
// The type witness is a concrete type.
MutableTerm constraintType = subjectType;
SmallVector<Term, 3> result;
auto typeWitnessSchema =
remapConcreteSubstitutionSchema(typeWitness, substitutions,
Context, result);
// Add a rule T.[P:A].[concrete: Foo.A] => T.[P:A].
constraintType.add(
Symbol::forConcreteType(
typeWitnessSchema, result, Context));
return constraintType;
}
void PropertyMap::recordConcreteConformanceRules(
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules) {
for (const auto &props : Entries) {
if (props->getConformsTo().empty())
continue;
if (props->ConcreteType) {
unsigned concreteRuleID = *props->ConcreteTypeRule;
// The GSB drops all conformance requirements on a type parameter equated
// to a concrete type, even if the concrete type doesn't conform. That is,
//
// protocol P {}
// <T where T : P, T == Int>
//
// minimizes as
//
// <T where T == Int>.
for (unsigned i : indices(props->ConformsTo)) {
auto *proto = props->ConformsTo[i];
auto conformanceRuleID = props->ConformsToRules[i];
recordConcreteConformanceRule(concreteRuleID, conformanceRuleID, proto,
inducedRules);
}
}
if (props->Superclass) {
unsigned superclassRuleID = *props->SuperclassRule;
// For superclass rules, we only introduce a concrete conformance if the
// superclass actually conforms. Otherwise, it is totally fine to have a
// signature like
//
// protocol P {}
// class C {}
// <T where T : P, T : C>
//
// There is no relation between P and C here.
// The conformances in SuperclassConformances should appear in the same
// order as the protocols in ConformsTo.
auto conformanceIter = props->SuperclassConformances.begin();
for (unsigned i : indices(props->ConformsTo)) {
if (conformanceIter == props->SuperclassConformances.end())
break;
auto *proto = props->ConformsTo[i];
if (proto != (*conformanceIter)->getProtocol())
continue;
unsigned conformanceRuleID = props->ConformsToRules[i];
recordConcreteConformanceRule(superclassRuleID, conformanceRuleID, proto,
inducedRules);
++conformanceIter;
}
assert(conformanceIter == props->SuperclassConformances.end());
}
}
}
void PropertyMap::recordConcreteConformanceRule(
unsigned concreteRuleID,
unsigned conformanceRuleID,
const ProtocolDecl *proto,
SmallVectorImpl<InducedRule> &inducedRules) {
if (!ConcreteConformanceRules.insert(
std::make_pair(concreteRuleID, conformanceRuleID)).second) {
// We've already emitted this rule.
return;
}
const auto &concreteRule = System.getRule(concreteRuleID);
const auto &conformanceRule = System.getRule(conformanceRuleID);
auto conformanceSymbol = *conformanceRule.isPropertyRule();
assert(conformanceSymbol.getKind() == Symbol::Kind::Protocol);
assert(conformanceSymbol.getProtocol() == proto);
auto concreteSymbol = *concreteRule.isPropertyRule();
assert(concreteSymbol.getKind() == Symbol::Kind::ConcreteType ||
concreteSymbol.getKind() == Symbol::Kind::Superclass);
RewritePath path;
// We have a pair of rules T.[P] and T'.[concrete: C].
// Either T == T', or T is a prefix of T', or T' is a prefix of T.
//
// Let T'' be the longest of T and T'.
MutableTerm rhs(concreteRule.getRHS().size() > conformanceRule.getRHS().size()
? concreteRule.getRHS()
: conformanceRule.getRHS());
// First, apply the conformance rule in reverse to obtain T''.[P].
path.add(RewriteStep::forRewriteRule(
/*startOffset=*/rhs.size() - conformanceRule.getRHS().size(),
/*endOffset=*/0,
/*ruleID=*/conformanceRuleID,
/*inverse=*/true));
// Now, apply the concrete type rule in reverse to obtain T''.[concrete: C].[P].
path.add(RewriteStep::forRewriteRule(
/*startOffset=*/rhs.size() - concreteRule.getRHS().size(),
/*endOffset=*/1,
/*ruleID=*/concreteRuleID,
/*inverse=*/true));
// Apply a concrete type adjustment to the concrete symbol if T' is shorter
// than T.
unsigned adjustment = rhs.size() - concreteRule.getRHS().size();
if (adjustment > 0 &&
!concreteSymbol.getSubstitutions().empty()) {
path.add(RewriteStep::forAdjustment(adjustment, /*endOffset=*/1,
/*inverse=*/false));
concreteSymbol = concreteSymbol.prependPrefixToConcreteSubstitutions(
MutableTerm(rhs.begin(), rhs.begin() + adjustment),
Context);
}
// Now, transform T''.[concrete: C].[P] into T''.[concrete: C : P].
Symbol concreteConformanceSymbol = [&]() {
if (concreteSymbol.getKind() == Symbol::Kind::ConcreteType) {
path.add(RewriteStep::forConcreteConformance(/*inverse=*/false));
return Symbol::forConcreteConformance(
concreteSymbol.getConcreteType(),
concreteSymbol.getSubstitutions(),
proto, Context);
} else {
assert(concreteSymbol.getKind() == Symbol::Kind::Superclass);
path.add(RewriteStep::forSuperclassConformance(/*inverse=*/false));
return Symbol::forConcreteConformance(
concreteSymbol.getSuperclass(),
concreteSymbol.getSubstitutions(),
proto, Context);
}
}();
MutableTerm lhs(rhs);
lhs.add(concreteConformanceSymbol);
// The path turns T'' (RHS) into T''.[concrete: C : P] (LHS), but we need
// it to go in the other direction.
path.invert();
inducedRules.emplace_back(std::move(lhs), std::move(rhs), std::move(path));
}