Files
swift-mirror/test/Constraints/patterns.swift
Pavel Yaskevich dc6f86d9b7 [CSRanking] Fix solution filtering not to erase everything when set is completely ambiguous
Since constraint solver has been improved to diagnose more problems
via "fixes", sometimes applying fixes might lead to producing solutions
which are completely ambiguous when compared to each other, and/or are
incomparable, which leads to `findBestSolutions` erasing all of them
while trying to compute best "partial" solution, which is incorrect.

Resolves: rdar://problem/42678836
2018-08-06 17:25:58 -07:00

408 lines
9.8 KiB
Swift

// RUN: %target-typecheck-verify-swift
// Leaf expression patterns are matched to corresponding pieces of a switch
// subject (TODO: or ~= expression) using ~= overload resolution.
switch (1, 2.5, "three") {
case (1, _, _):
()
// Double is ExpressibleByIntegerLiteral
case (_, 2, _),
(_, 2.5, _),
(_, _, "three"):
()
// ~= overloaded for (Range<Int>, Int)
case (0..<10, _, _),
(0..<10, 2.5, "three"),
(0...9, _, _),
(0...9, 2.5, "three"):
()
default:
()
}
switch (1, 2) {
case (var a, a): // expected-error {{use of unresolved identifier 'a'}}
()
}
// 'is' patterns can perform the same checks that 'is' expressions do.
protocol P { func p() }
class B : P {
init() {}
func p() {}
func b() {}
}
class D : B {
override init() { super.init() }
func d() {}
}
class E {
init() {}
func e() {}
}
struct S : P {
func p() {}
func s() {}
}
// Existential-to-concrete.
var bp : P = B()
switch bp {
case is B,
is D,
is S:
()
case is E:
()
default:
()
}
switch bp {
case let b as B:
b.b()
case let d as D:
d.b()
d.d()
case let s as S:
s.s()
case let e as E:
e.e()
default:
()
}
// Super-to-subclass.
var db : B = D()
switch db {
case is D:
()
case is E: // expected-warning {{always fails}}
()
default:
()
}
// Raise an error if pattern productions are used in expressions.
var b = var a // expected-error{{expected initial value after '='}} expected-error {{type annotation missing in pattern}} expected-error {{consecutive statements on a line must be separated by ';'}} {{8-8=;}}
var c = is Int // expected-error{{expected initial value after '='}} expected-error {{expected expression}} expected-error {{consecutive statements on a line must be separated by ';'}} {{8-8=;}}
// TODO: Bad recovery in these cases. Although patterns are never valid
// expr-unary productions, it would be good to parse them anyway for recovery.
//var e = 2 + var y
//var e = var y + 2
// 'E.Case' can be used in a dynamic type context as an equivalent to
// '.Case as E'.
protocol HairType {}
enum MacbookHair: HairType {
case HairSupply(S)
}
enum iPadHair<T>: HairType {
case HairForceOne
}
enum Watch {
case Sport, Watch, Edition
}
let hair: HairType = MacbookHair.HairSupply(S())
switch hair {
case MacbookHair.HairSupply(let s):
s.s()
case iPadHair<S>.HairForceOne:
()
case iPadHair<E>.HairForceOne:
()
case iPadHair.HairForceOne: // expected-error{{generic enum type 'iPadHair' is ambiguous without explicit generic parameters when matching value of type 'HairType'}}
()
case Watch.Edition: // TODO: should warn that cast can't succeed with currently known conformances
()
// TODO: Bad error message
case .HairForceOne: // expected-error{{cannot convert}}
()
default:
break
}
// <rdar://problem/19382878> Introduce new x? pattern
switch Optional(42) {
case let x?: break // expected-warning{{immutable value 'x' was never used; consider replacing with '_' or removing it}}
case nil: break
}
func SR2066(x: Int?) {
// nil literals should still work when wrapped in parentheses
switch x {
case (nil): break
case _?: break
}
switch x {
case ((nil)): break
case _?: break
}
switch (x, x) {
case ((nil), _): break
case (_?, _): break
}
}
// Test x???? patterns.
switch (nil as Int???) {
case let x???: print(x, terminator: "")
case let x??: print(x as Any, terminator: "")
case let x?: print(x as Any, terminator: "")
case 4???: break
case nil??: break // expected-warning {{case is already handled by previous patterns; consider removing it}}
case nil?: break // expected-warning {{case is already handled by previous patterns; consider removing it}}
default: break
}
switch ("foo" as String?) {
case "what": break
default: break
}
// Test some value patterns.
let x : Int?
extension Int {
func method() -> Int { return 42 }
}
func ~= <T : Equatable>(lhs: T?, rhs: T?) -> Bool {
return lhs == rhs
}
switch 4 as Int? {
case x?.method(): break // match value
default: break
}
switch 4 {
case x ?? 42: break // match value
default: break
}
for (var x) in 0...100 {} // expected-warning{{variable 'x' was never used; consider replacing with '_' or removing it}}
for var x in 0...100 {} // rdar://20167543 expected-warning{{variable 'x' was never used; consider replacing with '_' or removing it}}
for (let x) in 0...100 { _ = x} // expected-error {{'let' pattern cannot appear nested in an already immutable context}}
var (let y) = 42 // expected-error {{'let' cannot appear nested inside another 'var' or 'let' pattern}}
let (var z) = 42 // expected-error {{'var' cannot appear nested inside another 'var' or 'let' pattern}}
// Crash when re-typechecking EnumElementPattern.
// FIXME: This should actually type-check -- the diagnostics are bogus. But
// at least we don't crash anymore.
protocol PP {
associatedtype E
}
struct A<T> : PP {
typealias E = T
}
extension PP {
func map<T>(_ f: (Self.E) -> T) -> T {}
}
enum EE {
case A
case B
}
func good(_ a: A<EE>) -> Int {
return a.map {
switch $0 {
case .A:
return 1
default:
return 2
}
}
}
func bad(_ a: A<EE>) {
a.map { // expected-error {{unable to infer complex closure return type; add explicit type to disambiguate}} {{10-10= () -> Int in }}
let _: EE = $0
return 1
}
}
func ugly(_ a: A<EE>) {
a.map { // expected-error {{unable to infer complex closure return type; add explicit type to disambiguate}} {{10-10= () -> Int in }}
switch $0 {
case .A:
return 1
default:
return 2
}
}
}
// SR-2057
enum SR2057 {
case foo
}
let sr2057: SR2057?
if case .foo = sr2057 { } // expected-error{{enum case 'foo' not found in type 'SR2057?'}}
// Invalid 'is' pattern
class SomeClass {}
if case let doesNotExist as SomeClass:AlsoDoesNotExist {}
// expected-error@-1 {{use of undeclared type 'AlsoDoesNotExist'}}
// expected-error@-2 {{variable binding in a condition requires an initializer}}
// `.foo` and `.bar(...)` pattern syntax should also be able to match
// static members as expr patterns
struct StaticMembers: Equatable {
init() {}
init(_: Int) {}
init?(opt: Int) {}
static var prop = StaticMembers()
static var optProp: Optional = StaticMembers()
static func method(_: Int) -> StaticMembers { return prop }
static func method(withLabel: Int) -> StaticMembers { return prop }
static func optMethod(_: Int) -> StaticMembers? { return optProp }
static func ==(x: StaticMembers, y: StaticMembers) -> Bool { return true }
}
let staticMembers = StaticMembers()
let optStaticMembers: Optional = StaticMembers()
switch staticMembers {
case .init: break // expected-error{{cannot match values of type 'StaticMembers'}}
case .init(opt:): break // expected-error{{cannot match values of type 'StaticMembers'}}
case .init(): break
case .init(0): break
case .init(_): break // expected-error{{'_' can only appear in a pattern}}
case .init(let x): break // expected-error{{cannot appear in an expression}}
case .init(opt: 0): break // expected-error{{pattern cannot match values of type 'StaticMembers'}}
case .prop: break
// TODO: repeated error message
case .optProp: break // expected-error* {{not unwrapped}}
case .method: break // expected-error{{cannot match}}
case .method(0): break
case .method(_): break // expected-error{{'_' can only appear in a pattern}}
case .method(let x): break // expected-error{{cannot appear in an expression}}
case .method(withLabel:): break // expected-error{{cannot match}}
case .method(withLabel: 0): break
case .method(withLabel: _): break // expected-error{{'_' can only appear in a pattern}}
case .method(withLabel: let x): break // expected-error{{cannot appear in an expression}}
case .optMethod: break // expected-error{{cannot match}}
case .optMethod(0): break // expected-error{{pattern cannot match values of type 'StaticMembers'}}
}
_ = 0
// rdar://problem/32241441 - Add fix-it for cases in switch with optional chaining
struct S_32241441 {
enum E_32241441 {
case foo
case bar
}
var type: E_32241441 = E_32241441.foo
}
func rdar32241441() {
let s: S_32241441? = S_32241441()
switch s?.type {
case .foo: // expected-error {{enum case 'foo' not found in type 'S_32241441.E_32241441?'}} {{12-12=?}}
break;
case .bar: // expected-error {{enum case 'bar' not found in type 'S_32241441.E_32241441?'}} {{12-12=?}}
break;
}
}
// SR-6100
struct One<Two> {
public enum E: Error {
// if you remove associated value, everything works
case SomeError(String)
}
}
func testOne() {
do {
} catch let error { // expected-warning{{'catch' block is unreachable because no errors are thrown in 'do' block}}
if case One.E.SomeError = error {} // expected-error{{generic enum type 'One.E' is ambiguous without explicit generic parameters when matching value of type 'Error'}}
}
}
// SR-8347
// constrain initializer expressions of optional some pattern bindings to be optional
func test8347() -> String {
struct C {
subscript (s: String) -> String? {
return ""
}
subscript (s: String) -> [String] {
return [""]
}
func f() -> String? {
return ""
}
func f() -> Int {
return 3
}
func g() -> String {
return ""
}
func h() -> String { // expected-note {{found this candidate}}
return ""
}
func h() -> Double { // expected-note {{found this candidate}}
return 3.0
}
func h() -> Int? { //expected-note{{found this candidate}}
return 2
}
func h() -> Float? { //expected-note{{found this candidate}}
return nil
}
}
let c = C()
if let s = c[""] {
return s
}
if let s = c.f() {
return s
}
if let s = c.g() { //expected-error{{initializer for conditional binding must have Optional type, not 'String'}}
return s
}
if let s = c.h() { //expected-error{{ambiguous use of 'h()'}}
return s
}
}