Files
swift-mirror/test/ParseableInterface/ModuleCache/module-cache-init.swift
Nathan Hawes 58d622d796 [ParseableInterface] Don't serialize resource directory deps and stop adding cached modules to the dependency tracker
This patch modifies ParseableInterfaceBuilder::CollectDepsForSerialization to
avoid serializing dependencies from the runtime resource path into the
swiftmodules generated from .swiftinterface files. This means the module cache
should now be relocatable across machines.

It also modifies ParseableInterfaceModuleLoader to never add any dependencies
from the module cache and prebuilt cache to the dependency tracker (in addition
to the existing behaviour of not serializing them in the generated
swiftmodules). As a result, CollectDepsForSerialization no longer checks if the
dependencies it is given come from the cache as they are provided by the
dependency tracker. It now asserts that's the case instead.
2019-04-03 06:35:11 -07:00

73 lines
3.8 KiB
Swift

// RUN: %empty-directory(%t)
//
// Test will build a module TestModule that depends on OtherModule and LeafModule (built from other.swift and leaf.swift).
//
// RUN: echo 'public func LeafFunc() -> Int { return 10; }' >%t/leaf.swift
//
// RUN: echo 'import LeafModule' >%t/other.swift
// RUN: echo 'public func OtherFunc() -> Int { return LeafFunc(); }' >>%t/other.swift
//
// Phase 1: build LeafModule into a .swiftinterface file:
//
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -I %t -emit-parseable-module-interface-path %t/LeafModule.swiftinterface -module-name LeafModule %t/leaf.swift -emit-module -o /dev/null
// RUN: test -f %t/LeafModule.swiftinterface
// RUN: %FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-LEAFINTERFACE <%t/LeafModule.swiftinterface
// CHECK-LEAFINTERFACE: LeafFunc
//
//
// Phase 2: build OtherModule into a .swiftinterface _using_ LeafModule via LeafModule.swiftinterface, creating LeafModule-*.swiftmodule along the way.
//
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -I %t -module-cache-path %t/modulecache -emit-parseable-module-interface-path %t/OtherModule.swiftinterface -module-name OtherModule %t/other.swift -emit-module -o /dev/null
// RUN: test -f %t/OtherModule.swiftinterface
// RUN: %FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-OTHERINTERFACE <%t/OtherModule.swiftinterface
// CHECK-OTHERINTERFACE: OtherFunc
// RUN: test -f %t/modulecache/LeafModule-*.swiftmodule
// RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t/modulecache/LeafModule-*.swiftmodule | %FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-LEAFMODULE
// CHECK-LEAFMODULE: {{MODULE_NAME.*blob data = 'LeafModule'}}
// CHECK-LEAFMODULE: {{FILE_DEPENDENCY.*LeafModule.swiftinterface'}}
// CHECK-LEAFMODULE: FUNC_DECL
// RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t/modulecache/LeafModule-*.swiftmodule | %FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-LEAFMODULE-NEGATIVE
// CHECK-LEAFMODULE-NEGATIVE-NOT: {{FILE_DEPENDENCY.*Swift.swiftmodule([/\\].+[.]swiftmodule)?'}}
//
//
// Phase 3: build TestModule into a .swiftmodule explicitly us OtherModule via OtherModule.swiftinterface, creating OtherModule-*.swiftmodule along the way.
//
// RUN: %target-swift-frontend -I %t -module-cache-path %t/modulecache -emit-module -emit-dependencies -emit-dependencies-path %t/TestModule.d -o %t/TestModule.swiftmodule -module-name TestModule %s
// RUN: test -f %t/TestModule.swiftmodule
// RUN: test -f %t/modulecache/OtherModule-*.swiftmodule
// RUN: test -f %t/TestModule.d
// RUN: llvm-bcanalyzer -dump %t/modulecache/OtherModule-*.swiftmodule | %FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-OTHERMODULE
// CHECK-OTHERMODULE: {{MODULE_NAME.*blob data = 'OtherModule'}}
// CHECK-OTHERMODULE-NOT: {{FILE_DEPENDENCY.*Swift.swiftmodule([/\\].+[.]swiftmodule)?'}}
// CHECK-OTHERMODULE: {{FILE_DEPENDENCY.*LeafModule.swiftinterface'}}
// CHECK-OTHERMODULE: {{FILE_DEPENDENCY.*OtherModule.swiftinterface'}}
// CHECK-OTHERMODULE: FUNC_DECL
//
// Quirk: because the cached .swiftmodules have a hash name component that
// integrates target, and we sort the contents of lines in a .d file by the
// dependency's reverse-name (for reasons), the order in which the cached
// .swiftmodules are listed in the .d file will vary _by target_.
//
// So we cannot write a single set of CHECK-SAME lines here that will work
// for all targets: some will have LeafModule first, some OtherModule
// first. So instead we just use CHECK-DAG.
//
// RUN: %FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-DEPENDS <%t/TestModule.d
//
// CHECK-DEPENDS: TestModule.swiftmodule :
// CHECK-DEPENDS-DAG: LeafModule.swiftinterface
// CHECK-DEPENDS-DAG: OtherModule.swiftinterface
// CHECK-DEPENDS-DAG: Swift.swiftmodule
// CHECK-DEPENDS-DAG: SwiftOnoneSupport.swiftmodule
//
// RUN: %FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-DEPENDS-NEGATIVE <%t/TestModule.d
//
// CHECK-DEPENDS-NEGATIVE-NOT: {{LeafModule-[^ ]+.swiftmodule}}
// CHECK-DEPENDS-NEGATIVE-NOT: {{OtherModule-[^ ]+.swiftmodule}}
import OtherModule
public func TestFunc() {
print(OtherFunc())
}