conversions to and from UnresolvedType. This will allow UnresolvedType to be
used more aggressively and predictably by CSDiags. This is NFC, but used in
the next patch.
Swift SVN r31318
This is a step towards partially-applying methods that return Self
on existentials.
- We model opening of both existential values and metatypes with
OpenExistentialExpr, but erasure had two forms, ErasureExpr and
MetatypeErasureExpr. Combine them into one, since both Sema and
SILGen have similar code paths for each.
- If the source type of an ErasureExpr is a closed existential,
have Sema emit an OpenExistentialExpr, and remove SILGen's
openExistentialForErasure() path, which mostly duplicates
openExistentialImpl().
- There was one difference between openExistentialForErasure() and
openExistentialImpl(). The former would emit the opaque value in
+0 context, and the latter in a +1 with initialization. The
previous patch ensures that visitOpaqueValueExpr() generates
equivalent code in both cases.
Swift SVN r31261
the regressions that r31105 introduced in the validation tests, as well as fixing a number
of other validation tests as well.
Introduce a new UnresolvedType to the type system, and have CSDiags start to use it
as a way to get more type information out of incorrect subexpressions. UnresolvedType
generally just propagates around the type system like a type variable:
- it magically conforms to all protocols
- it CSGens as an unconstrained type variable.
- it ASTPrints as _, just like a type variable.
The major difference is that UnresolvedType can be used outside the context of a
ConstraintSystem, which is useful for CSGen since it sets up several of them to
diagnose subexpressions w.r.t. their types.
For now, our use of this is extremely limited: when a closureexpr has no contextual
type available and its parameters are invalid, we wipe them out with UnresolvedType
(instead of the previous nulltype dance) to get ambiguities later on.
We also introduce a new FreeTypeVariableBinding::UnresolvedType approach for
constraint solving (and use this only in one place in CSDiags so far, to resolve
the callee of a CallExpr) which solves a system and rewrites any leftover type
variables as UnresolvedTypes. This allows us to get more precise information out,
for example, diagnosing:
func r22162441(lines: [String]) {
lines.map { line in line.fooBar() }
}
with: value of type 'String' has no member 'fooBar'
instead of: type of expression is ambiguous without more context
This improves a number of other diagnostics as well, but is just the infrastructural
stepping stone for greater things.
Swift SVN r31130
as a way to get more type information out of incorrect subexpressions. UnresolvedType
generally just propagates around the type system like a type variable:
- it magically conforms to all protocols
- it CSGens as an unconstrained type variable.
- it ASTPrints as _, just like a type variable.
The major difference is that UnresolvedType can be used outside the context of a
ConstraintSystem, which is useful for CSGen since it sets up several of them to
diagnose subexpressions w.r.t. their types.
For now, our use of this is extremely limited: when a closureexpr has no contextual
type available and its parameters are invalid, we wipe them out with UnresolvedType
(instead of the previous nulltype dance) to get ambiguities later on.
We also introduce a new FreeTypeVariableBinding::UnresolvedType approach for
constraint solving (and use this only in one place in CSDiags so far, to resolve
the callee of a CallExpr) which solves a system and rewrites any leftover type
variables as UnresolvedTypes. This allows us to get more precise information out,
for example, diagnosing:
func r22162441(lines: [String]) {
lines.map { line in line.fooBar() }
}
with: value of type 'String' has no member 'fooBar'
instead of: type of expression is ambiguous without more context
This improves a number of other diagnostics as well, but is just the infrastructural
stepping stone for greater things.
Swift SVN r31105
The defer body func is only ever fully applied, so SILGen can avoid allocating a closure for it if it's declared as a 'func', making it slightly more efficient at -Onone.
Swift SVN r30638
Requiring a variadic parameter to come at the end of the parameter
list is an old restriction that makes no sense nowadays, and which we
had all thought we had already lifted. It made variadic parameters
unusable with trailing closures or defaulted arguments, and made our
new print() design unimplementable.
Remove this restriction, replacing it with a less onerous and slightly
less silly restriction that we not have more than one variadic
parameter in a given parameter clause. Fixes rdar://problem/20127197.
Swift SVN r30542
Add a new convention to describe what happens with
nonzero_result on a type that isn't imported as Bool.
This isn't really a safe convention to implement, but
calls are fine.
Implements <rdar://21715350>.
Swift SVN r29953
value member constraints do.
This fixes:
<rdar://problem/21662365> QoI: diagnostic for for-each over an optional sequence isn't great
before we'd produce:
t.swift:3:10: error: '[Int]?' does not have a member named 'Generator'
for x in array {
^
now we produce:
t.swift:3:10: error: value of optional type '[Int]?' not unwrapped; did you mean to use '!' or '?'?
for x in array {
^
Swift SVN r29902
While the archetype builder is constructing archetypes, it eagerly
produces the set of nested archetypes for each archetype. If the
construction of any of those nested archetypes refers to another
archetype, we would fail unceremonerously with an assertion. Fill in
the nested type names (but not their actual types) eagerly, allowing
the actual types to be determined lazily.
This is plumbing for rdar://problem/21620908, which still trips an
unrelated assertion, preventing a useful testcase at this step.
Swift SVN r29841
When two protocol requirements would otherwise be considered
"identical", take the one from the most-refined protocol. This whole
hack *should* go away when we properly handle overriding for protocol
requirements, but for now it fixes rdar://problem/21322215.
Swift SVN r29785
Represents a heap allocation containing a value of type T, which we'll be able to use to represent the payloads of indirect enum cases, and also improve codegen of current boxes, which generates non-uniqued box metadata on every allocation, which is dumb. No codegen changes or IRGen support yet; that will come later.
This time, fix a paste-o that caused SILBlockStorageTypes to get replaced with SILBoxTypes during type substitution. Oops.
Swift SVN r29489
Represents a heap allocation containing a value of type T, which we'll be able to use to represent the payloads of indirect enum cases, and also improve codegen of current boxes, which generates non-uniqued box metadata on every allocation, which is dumb. No codegen changes or IRGen support yet; that will come later.
Swift SVN r29474
We currently complain about this type of thing:
class C<T> {
@objc func foo() -> [T]
}
However this is also not supported, but crashes in IRGen:
class C {
@objc func foo<T>() -> [T]
}
Also re-word a @nonobjc diagnostic and clean up some code for @objc and
@nonobjc.
Fixes <rdar://problem/19600602> and <rdar://problem/20886887>.
Swift SVN r29117
initializer has been type-checked, rather than a bit for the entire
PatternBindingDecl.
<rdar://problem/21057425> Crash while compiling attached test-app.
Swift SVN r29049
instead of being an expression.
To the user, this has a couple of behavior changes, stemming from its non-expression-likeness.
- #available cannot be parenthesized anymore
- #available is in its own clause, not used in a 'where' clause of if/let.
Also, the implementation in the compiler is simpler and fits the model better. This
fixes:
<rdar://problem/20904820> Following a "let" condition with #available is incorrectly rejected
Swift SVN r28521
Verify that this bit is set during type-checking on
every ApplyExpr, and fix the remaining locations where
we weren't doing coverage testing on expressions; most
of these were harmless, but it's better to be safe.
Swift SVN r28509
Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
a list of their elements, instead of abusing TupleExpr/ParenExpr
to hold them.
This is a more correct representation of what is going on in the
code and produces slightly better diagnostics in obscure cases.
However, the real reason to fix this is that the ParenExpr's that
were being formed were not being installed into the "semantic"
view of the collection expr, not getting type checked correctly,
and led to nonsensical ParenExprs. These non-sensical ParenExprs
blocked turning on AST verification of other ones.
With this fixed, we can finally add AST verification that
IdentityExpr's have sensible types.
Swift SVN r27850
Now we bind the defer body into a ClosureExpr and emit it at the point of
the defer. At any exit points out of the controlled region, we emit a call
to the closure.
This should cover any problems where expressions cannot be emitted multiple times.
However, this is dramatically more complex than the obvious implementation, so I
hope this patch can be reverted.
Swift SVN r27767
the printed interface.
Previously we printed the typechecked and uniqued requirements and the result was non-sensical.
Long-term the requirements will be preserved in a better form but for now print the requirements
and serialize them.
rdar://19963093
Swift SVN r27680
Change all uses of "do { ... } while <cond>" to use "repeat" instead.
Rename DoWhileStmt to RepeatWhileStmt. Add diagnostic suggesting change
of 'do' to 'repeat' if a condition is found afterwards.
<rdar://problem/20336424> rename do/while loops to repeat/while & introduce "repeat <count> {}" loops
Swift SVN r27650
