are not settable (like get-only ones). Set the 'isLet' bit in various
places, but not the particularly interesting or useful places yet.
Swift SVN r11121
This prints the identifying info for a protocol conformance without the actual witness maps, recursively naming specialized or inherited conformances.
Swift SVN r10899
The goal of this series of commits is to allow the main module to consist
of both source files and AST files, where the AST files represent files
that were already built and don't need to be rebuilt, or of Swift source
files and imported Clang headers that share a module (because they are in
the same target).
Currently modules are divided into different kinds, and that defines how
decls are looked up, how imports are managed, etc. In order to achieve the
goal above, that polymorphism should be pushed down to the individual units
within a module, so that instead of TranslationUnit, BuiltinModule,
SerializedModule, and ClangModule, we have SourceFile, BuiltinUnit,
SerializedFile, and ClangUnit. (Better names welcome.) At that point we can
hopefully collapse TranslationUnit into Module and make Module non-polymorphic.
This commit makes SourceFile the subclass of an abstract FileUnit, and
makes TranslationUnit hold an array of FileUnits instead of SourceFiles.
To demonstrate that this is actually working, the Builtin module has also
been converted to FileUnit: it is now a TranslationUnit containing a single
BuiltinUnit.
Swift SVN r10830
This allows expressions such as ".foo" and ".foo(1)" to refer to
static variables and static methods, respectively, as well as enum
cases.
To get here, rework the parsing of delayed identifier expressions a
bit, so that the argument itself is part of the delayed argument
expression rather than a separate call expression. This simplifies
both the handling of patterns of this form and the type checker, which
can now user simpler constraints.
If we really want to support (.foo)(1), we can make that work, but it
seems unnecessary and perhaps confusing.
Swift SVN r10626
Handle the static var case in various places in the type-checker where it was assumed not to happen. For simplicity, build static var references as DeclRefs for now, with an assert to ensure we fix this before turning on potentially dynamic cases.
Swift SVN r10372
Similar to the T -> U? conversion, allow T? to be converted to U? through a bind-convert-inject chain. Naively adding this conversion creates ambiguities in the type checker, opening up multiple paths to the same solution in certain cases, so add a a special case to the solver that avoids introducing the conversion if a solution is already available by other means. (Doug figured out that part; thanks Doug!)
This still introduces a regression in test/Constraints/optional.swift, rendering a call ambiguous when overloaded on argument types. <rdar://problem/15367036>
Swift SVN r9857
wide
Currently integer literals are 64-bit. In order to allow checking for overflow
while converting an integer literal to swift.UInt/Int* types we need at least
65 bits. But floating point numbers (Float32, Float64, Float80) are
BuiltinIntegerLiteralConvertible. In order to allow spelling large floating
point constants, we allow 136-bit literals.
Rationale: 128 bits are enough to represent the absolute value of min/max IEEE
Binary32, and we need 1 bit to represent the sign. 136 is 129 rounded to the
next 8 bits.
The plan is to have builtins that do the overflow check and convert 136-bit
numbers to the required width. We need these builtins for both integers and
floating point numbers to ensure that 136-bit numbers are folded into sane
constants in SIL and don’t escape to LLVM IR.
Swift SVN r9253
Now that we have a solid Optional-based story for dynamic casts, it's no longer needed, and can be expressed as '(x as T)!'. Future refinement of the 'as' syntax will deal with the unfortunate extra parens.
Swift SVN r9181
Right now this is just an extra layer of indirection for the decls,
operators, and imports in a TU, but it's the first step towards compiling
multiple source files at once without pretending they're all in a single
file. This is important for the "implicit visibility" feature, where
declarations from other source files in the same module are accessible
from the file currently being compiled.
Swift SVN r9072
As with the monadic '?', we treat any left-bound '!' as a postfix
operator. Currently, it extracts the value of its optional
subexpression, failing at run-time if the optional is empty.
Swift SVN r8948
When building the (dependent) interface type of generic functions,
don't resolve any generic parameter types to archetypes, even those at
outer levels. Instead, keep everything dependent.
As a special case, the type of 'self' gets baked into the parameter
patterns with archetypes, so reconstruct the 'self' type ourselves.
The actual output of this is still frustratingly untestable, but we
get decent coverage because all of the type checking of generic
functions goes through here first.
Swift SVN r8936
If an enum has a valid raw type, synthesize a RawType associated type along with fromRaw and toRaw methods.
An implicit conformance to RawRepresentable is not yet set up. This synthesis may need to be done earlier in order for the names to be available during type-checking of definitions in the enum too.
Swift SVN r8890
Parse '_' as a DiscardAssignmentExpr. Type-check it as an lvalue, and check that it only appears in the LHS of AssignExprs. During matching pattern resolution, convert it into an AnyPattern. In SILGen, when we see '_' in the LHS of an assignment, ignore the corresponding RHS rvalue.
Swift SVN r8848
Though we plan to revamp the casting syntax, our general plan is for this form of cast, which does a conditional cast and returns an Optional<T> result, to be the one that survives. Parse the status-quo syntax 'x as? T' and type-check it. While we're here, refresh some fixits for redundant casts that referred to the now defunct 'as T' coercion syntax to completely remove whatever cast was in the source code.
Swift SVN r8805
Require that either T be default constructible or that the user provide a closure that maps indices to initial values. We don't actually call the closure yet to initialize the array; that's blocked on function abstraction difference <rdar://problem/13251236>.
Swift SVN r8801
Instead of relying on the subpattern being a well-formed TuplePattern, let's track our own subelements so we can associate them to properties and validate them ourselves.
Swift SVN r8771
