If a module was first read using the adjacent swiftmodule and then
reloaded using the swiftinterface, we would do an up to date check on
the adjacent module but write out the unit using the swiftinterface.
This would cause the same modules to be indexed repeatedly for the first
invocation using a new SDK. On the next run we would instead raad the
swiftmodule from the cache and thus the out of date check would match
up.
The impact of this varies depending on the size of the module graph in
the initial compilation and the number of jobs started at the same time.
Each SDK dependency is re-indexed *and* reloaded, which is a drain on
both CPU and memory. Thus, if many jobs are initially started and
they're all going down this path, it can cause the system to run out of
memory very quickly.
Resolves rdar://103119964.
Diagnose situations where a sub-class or a protocol do not have all
of the reflection metadata attributes required by a superclass.
Resolves: rdar://103990788
Introduce a new flag `-export-as` to specify a name used to identify the
target module in swiftinterfaces. This provides an analoguous feature
for Swift module as Clang's `export_as` feature.
In practice it should be used when a lower level module `MyKitCore` is
desired to be shown publicly as a downstream module `MyKit`. This should
be used in conjunction with `@_exported import MyKitCore` from `MyKit`
that allows clients to refer to all services as being part of `MyKit`,
while the new `-export-as MyKit` from `MyKitCore` will ensure that the
clients swiftinterfaces also use the `MyKit` name for all services.
In the current implementation, the export-as name is used in the
module's clients and not in the declarer's swiftinterface (e.g.
`MyKitCore`'s swiftinterface still uses the `MyKitCore` module name).
This way the module swiftinterface can be verified. In the future, we
may want a similar behavior for other modules in between `MyKitCore` and
`MyKit` as verifying a swiftinterface referencing `MyKit` without it
being imported would fail.
rdar://103888618
Not aliasing the stdlib should allows it to be used in inlinable code.
Since builtin isn't imported explicitly, references to it shouldn't use
the alias.
rdar://104582241
Align the grammar of macro declarations with SE-0382, so that macro
definitions are parsed as an expression. External macro definitions
are referenced via a referenced to the macro `#externalMacro`. Define
that macro in the standard library, and recognize uses of it as the
definition of other macros to use externally-defined macros. For
example, this means that the "stringify" macro used in a lot of
examples is now defined as something like this:
@expression macro stringify<T>(_ value: T) -> (T, String) =
#externalMacro(module: "MyMacros", type: "StringifyMacro")
We still parse the old "A.B" syntax for two reasons. First, it's
helpful to anyone who has existing code using the prior syntax, so they
get a warning + Fix-It to rewrite to the new syntax. Second, we use it
to define builtin macros like `externalMacro` itself, which looks like this:
@expression
public macro externalMacro<T>(module: String, type: String) -> T =
Builtin.ExternalMacro
This uses the same virtual `Builtin` module as other library builtins,
and we can expand it to handle other builtin macro implementations
(such as #line) over time.
Always parse macro expansions, regardless of language mode, and
eliminate the fallback path for very, very, very old object literals
like `#Color`. Instead, check for the feature flag for macro
declaration and at macro expansion time, since this is a semantic
restriction.
While here, refactor things so the vast majority of the macro-handling
logic still applies even if the Swift Swift parser is disabled. Only
attempts to expand the macro will fail. This allows us to enable the
macro-diagnostics test everywhere.
If the callee is a non-generic thunk which calls a (not inlinable) generic function in the defining module,
it's more efficient to not devirtualize, but call the non-generic thunk - even though it's done through the witness table.
Example:
```
protocol P {
func f(x: [Int]) // not generic
}
struct S: P {
func f(x: some RandomAccessCollection<Int>) { ... } // generic
}
```
In the defining module, the generic conformance can be fully specialized (which is not possible in the client module, because it's not inlinable).
rdar://102623022
If a type conforms to a protocol that has a public `$Storage`/`$storage`
requirement the synthesis should produce a public `$Storage`/`$storage`
implementation as well to match the requirement.
Resolves: rdar://103270262
Introduce a new behavior when printing references to modules with an
`export_as` definition. Use the `export_as` name in the public swiftinterface
and the real module name in the private swiftinterface.
This has some limits but should still be an improvement over the current
behavior. First, the we use the `export_as` names only for references to clang
decls, not Swift decls with an underlying module defining an `export_as`.
Second, we always print the `export_as` name in the public swiftinterface,
even in the original swiftinterface file when the `export_as` target is likely
not know, so that generated swiftinterface is still broken.
This behavior is enabled by the flags `-enable-experimental-feature ModuleInterfaceExportAs`
or the `SWIFT_DEBUG_USE_EXPORTED_MODULE_NAME_IN_PUBLIC_ONLY` env var. We may
consider turning it on by default in the future.
rdar://98532918
Macros are an experimental feature, as such are not available on
non-asserts compilers.
Adding requires asserts to remaining experimental macro tests.
- ModuleInterface/macros.swift
- Serialization/macros.swift
This new flag should allow module authors to specify allowable client list. This list is printed
in the textual module interface. Diagnostics support can come later.
In AliasModuleNames, avoid wrongfully printing aliased names for modules
that were not aliased. This can happen in the case of modules indirectly
imported via a reexport.
rdar://102262019
