Commit Graph

145 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Slava Pestov
fbe3d71b19 RequirementMachine: Small cleanup 2024-09-14 23:33:11 -04:00
Slava Pestov
273c4b2b1a RequirementMachine: Convert to new assertions 2024-06-22 08:53:22 -04:00
Slava Pestov
10a2ddb95e RequirementMachine: Fix MaxConcreteNesting check to take initial rules into account
Fixes rdar://123357717.
2024-03-06 21:42:49 -05:00
Ben Barham
ef8825bfe6 Migrate llvm::Optional to std::optional
LLVM has removed llvm::Optional, move over to std::optional. Also
clang-format to fix up all the renamed #includes.
2024-02-21 11:20:06 -08:00
Slava Pestov
dcca5ced0f RequirementMachine: Remove -warn-redundant-requirements flag 2024-02-02 14:57:19 -05:00
Slava Pestov
8afff61699 AST: Replace TypeArrayView<GenericTypeParamType> with ArrayRef<GenericTypeParamType *>
This basically undoes 3da6fe9c0d, which in hindsight was wrong.

There were no other usages of TypeArrayView anywhere else except for
GenericSignature::getGenericParams(), and it was almost never what
you want, so callers had to convert back and forth to an ArrayRef.
Remove it.
2023-06-29 19:23:44 -04:00
Evan Wilde
250082df25 [NFC] Reformat all the LLVMs
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
2023-06-27 09:03:52 -07:00
Evan Wilde
f3ff561c6f [NFC] add llvm namespace to Optional and None
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
                     bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".

I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
2023-06-27 09:03:52 -07:00
Slava Pestov
9339443e79 RequirementMachine: Diagnose recursive requirements
Note the test cases in abstract_type_witnesses used to pass but are now
rejected. This is fine, because doing anything more complicated used to
crash, and the GSB would crash or misbehave with these examples.
2022-08-11 14:12:06 -04:00
Slava Pestov
e3ab64afa7 RequirementMachine: Compute recursive rules 2022-08-11 14:10:01 -04:00
Slava Pestov
506cc356c1 RequirementMachine: New minimal conformances algorithm 2022-07-05 21:40:27 -04:00
Slava Pestov
e3488cecb2 RequirementMachine: Move decomposeTermIntoConformanceRuleLeftHandSides() to RewriteSystem 2022-07-05 21:40:06 -04:00
Slava Pestov
d212041dfb RequirementMachine: Fold RewriteSystem::processConflicts() into recordConflict() and add debug output 2022-04-01 01:05:54 -04:00
Holly Borla
caee699560 [RequirementMachine] Mention the type parameter that is the subject of
two conflicting requirements in diagnostics where possible.
2022-03-29 18:27:45 -07:00
Holly Borla
99f5e365cc [RequirementMachine] Compute and diagnose conflicting rules in the minimal
rewrite system of a generic/requirement signature.
2022-03-29 18:26:26 -07:00
Slava Pestov
4d097da73c RequirementMachine: Re-use requirement machines constructed by minimization for queries
Fixes rdar://problem/88135641.
2022-03-26 00:56:41 -04:00
Slava Pestov
06a25fa452 RequirementMachine: Don't normalize replacement paths for redundant rules 2022-03-25 22:28:11 -04:00
Slava Pestov
7d0215e6e0 RequirementMachine: Tweak rule limit non-termination heuristic
Add the length of the longest *initial* rule to the rule length limit
before comparing.

Fixes https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-16024.
2022-03-25 01:00:49 -04:00
Slava Pestov
fb487f80e7 RequirementMachine: Factor out RewriteSystem::addRules() from RewriteSystem::initialize() 2022-03-16 12:24:20 -04:00
Slava Pestov
c25cd24fe9 RequirementMachine: RewriteSystem::initialize() takes writtenRequirements as an rvalue 2022-03-16 12:24:20 -04:00
Slava Pestov
c08601bee9 RequirementMachine: Implement RewriteSystem::getLocalRules() 2022-03-16 00:58:30 -04:00
Slava Pestov
327e7e580b RequirementMachine: Add importedRules parameter to RewriteSystem::initialize() 2022-03-16 00:58:30 -04:00
Slava Pestov
1d8dd94501 RequirementMachine: Refactor RuleBuilder in preparation for rule sharing 2022-03-15 18:34:54 -04:00
Slava Pestov
755941c21f RequirementMachine: Split off Rule.cpp from RewriteSystem.cpp 2022-03-15 13:35:34 -04:00
Slava Pestov
f5b3d19703 RequirementMachine: Replace hadError() with getErrors() returning an OptionSet
This gives us more fine-grained information which will be plumbed
through the various requests.
2022-03-14 12:33:18 -04:00
Slava Pestov
762bf1e7d0 RequirementMachine: Refine 'derived via protocol typealias' criterion
Preserves concrete type rules on associated types that were derived
from rules indirectly formed from protocol typealias rules.

That is, if you have a pair of rules in another minimization domain:

    [P].A.[concrete: C] => [P].A
    [Q:T].[P] => [Q:T]

Then completion will introduce a new rule:

    [Q:T].A.[concrete: C] => [Q:T].A

Since this rule is outside of our minimization domain, we don't record
a rewrite loop for it, and it will never become redundant.

Now if we have a rule in our own minimization domain:

    T.[Q:T].A => T.[Q:U]

Then we get a new rule:

    T.[Q:U].[concrete: C] => T.[Q:U]

Make sure we keep this rule around on account of it being derived from
([Q:T].A.[concrete: C] => [Q:T].A).
2022-03-14 12:33:18 -04:00
Slava Pestov
f082c02e42 RequirementMachine: Plumb through the loop candidate to isRedundantRuleFn 2022-03-11 17:28:01 -05:00
Holly Borla
7ce6504b93 [RequirementMachine] Avoid passing the requirement error vector through
initialization of the rewrite system.

Instead, the rewrite system can determine trivially redundant requirements
by finding structural requirements with no associated rewrite rules.
2022-03-10 13:13:50 -08:00
Holly Borla
0085eb0dfe [RequirementMachine] Separate setting the explicit bit and the requirement
ID for a rewrite rule.
2022-03-09 21:22:53 -08:00
Holly Borla
4b55c30fad [RequirementMachine] Instead of recording redundant requirements and other
diagnostics in the rewrite system, pass down the 'errors' vector from the
top-level requests.
2022-03-09 18:18:43 -08:00
Holly Borla
a154641288 [RequirementMachine] Propagate explicit requirement IDs from redundant
rules in a separate pass after homotopy reduction.

RewriteSystem::propagateExplicitBits was too eager in propagating
IDs from explicit rules within rewrite loops, which resulted in bogus
redundancy warnings when the canonical form of an explicit rule was
given a different requirement ID. Instead, propagate requirement IDs
after homotopy reduction when redundant rules are computed and rewrite
loops are simplified.
2022-03-09 12:14:58 -08:00
Holly Borla
be30d76732 [RequirementMachine] Diagnose redundant requirements found during minimization
of the rewrite system.
2022-03-09 12:14:58 -08:00
Holly Borla
3c95cac5e8 [RequirementMachine] Store a requirement ID for explicit rules in the
rewrite system.

This ID can be used to index into the WrittenRequirements array in the
rewrite system to retrieve the structural requirement, e.g. for the
purpose of diagnostics.
2022-03-09 12:14:58 -08:00
Holly Borla
b18e815436 [RequirementMachine] Preserve structural requirements during rule construction,
and diagnose trivially redundant rules in the rewrite system.
2022-03-09 12:14:58 -08:00
Slava Pestov
713e0a4a6d RequirementMachine: Reduce replacement paths for redundant rules to left-canonical normal form
This brings back the code I deleted in 1bf6102f1e
but repurposes it to simplify the replacement paths recorded for
redundant rewrite rules only.
2022-03-08 22:47:22 -05:00
Slava Pestov
5281426569 RequirementMachine: Fix minimization when protocol is constrained to a class that conforms to the protocol
Consider this example:

    protocol P : C {}
    class C : P {}

    <T where T : P>

The GenericSignatureBuilder thinks the minimized signature is
<T where T : P>. The RequirementMachine would minimize it down to
<T where T : C>. The latter is more correct, since the conformance
here is concrete and no witness table needs to be passed in at
runtime, however for strict binary compatibility we need to produce
the same signature as the GenericSignatureBuilder.

Accomplish this by changing the minimal conformances algorithm to
detect "circular concrete conformance rules", which take the form

    [P].[concrete: C : Q]

Where Q : P. These rules are given special handling. Ordinarily a
protocol conformance rule is eliminated before a concrete conformance
rule; however concrete conformances derived from circular
conformances are considered to be redundant from the get-go,
preventing protocol conformances that can be written in terms of
such concrete conformances from themselves becoming redundant.

Fixes rdar://problem/89633532.
2022-03-02 03:13:41 -05:00
Slava Pestov
a69ac78482 RequirementMachine: Rework PropertyMap::recordConflict() for GSB compatibility
We want to prefer explicit rules when an explicit rule and non-explicit
rule conflict. Since the explicit bit hasn't been computed yet when
building the property map, save conflicting rule pairs in a side table,
and then process them later in homotopy reduction.

The side table will also be useful for diagnostics later.
2022-02-17 19:40:58 -05:00
Slava Pestov
86d47d951d RequirementMachine: Re-visit substitution-simplified rules for concrete unification 2022-02-17 19:40:58 -05:00
Slava Pestov
991fe1dbd8 RequirementMachine: Preserve replacement paths for redundant rules 2022-02-16 16:28:08 -05:00
Slava Pestov
57d89a6f11 RequirementMachine: Use processTypeDifference() in simplifyLeftHandSideSubstitutions() 2022-02-15 04:02:46 -05:00
Slava Pestov
12ba9bf1ab RequirementMachine: Move processTypeDifference() method and friends from PropertyMap to RewriteSystem 2022-02-15 04:02:46 -05:00
Slava Pestov
41a6f9e118 RequirementMachine: Remove old implementation of simplifySubstitutions() 2022-02-15 04:02:46 -05:00
Slava Pestov
5e54a52c0e RequirementMachine: Remove old implementation of simplifyLeftHandSideSubstitutions()
Now that the PropertyMap to the concrete simplification version is optional,
we can just pass nullptr here to get the old behavior where type terms are
simplified to canonical anchors and no concrete simplification is performed.
2022-02-15 04:02:46 -05:00
Slava Pestov
2e3cb17666 RequirementMachine: Refactor concrete substitution pass 2022-02-15 04:02:46 -05:00
Slava Pestov
fa65fd0e05 RequirementMachine: Plumb protocol typealiases through minimization
Now that we can detect protocol typealias rules, collect and keep
track of them so that they can be recorded in protocol requirement
signatures.

For now, this is all NFC since nothing introduces such rules into
the rewrite system, except for invalid requirements which are
diagnosed anyway.
2022-02-13 00:24:23 -05:00
Slava Pestov
f9c2d9fd7c RequirementMachine: Introduce Rule::isProtocolTypeAliasRule()
There are two kinds of protocol typealiases:

1) The underlying type is a type parameter. These rules look like
   [P].A => X where X is the underlying type.

2) The underlying type is a concrete type. These rules look like
   [P].A.[concrete: C] => [P].A.

The isProtocolTypeAliasRule() predicate detects both cases and
returns the type alias name ('A', in the above examples). For now
it's not used anywhere, since we don't actually introduce these
rules for any reason.
2022-02-13 00:24:23 -05:00
Slava Pestov
0d0bcb2ff1 RequirementMachine: Simplify the Symbol API for removal of merged associated types 2022-02-07 18:57:45 -05:00
Slava Pestov
e2e088e082 RequirementMachine: Remove merged associated types from completion 2022-02-07 18:57:45 -05:00
Slava Pestov
00d226fd2f RequirementMachine: Store the base term in the TypeDifference 2022-02-07 08:20:59 -05:00
Slava Pestov
06d4770adb RequirementMachine: Teach homotopy reduction to better deal with incomparable rules 2022-02-07 08:20:59 -05:00