Static member referenced were marked as `@Sendable` by `InferSendableFromCaptures`
because metatypes used to be always Sendable which is no longer the case, so in
order to maintain the source compatibility we need to downgrade missing `@Sendable`
to a warning for unapplied static member references.
This affects primarily operators at the moment because other static members
form a curry thunk with a call inside and would be diagnosed as a capture.
Resolves: rdar://150777469
An "abstract" ProtocolConformanceRef is a conformance of a type
parameter or archetype to a given protocol. Previously, we would only
store the protocol requirement itself---but not track the actual
conforming type, requiring clients of ProtocolConformanceRef to keep
track of this information separately.
Record the conforming type as part of an abstract ProtocolConformanceRef,
so that clients will be able to recover it later. This is handled by a uniqued
AbstractConformance structure, so that ProtocolConformanceRef itself stays one
pointer.
There remain a small number of places where we create an abstract
ProtocolConformanceRef with a null type. We'll want to chip away at
those and establish some stronger invariants on the abstract conformance
in the future.
To pave the way for the new experimental feature which will operate on '@const' attribute and expand the scope of what's currently handled by '_const' without breaking compatibility, for now.
Within the constraint system, introduce a new kind of conformance constraint,
a "nonisolated conforms-to" constraint, which can only be satisfied by
nonisolated conformances. Introduce this constraint instead of the normal
conforms-to constraint whenever the subject type is a type parameter that
has either a `Sendable` or `SendableMetatype` constraint, i.e., when the type
or its values can escape the current isolation domain.
First problem - the logic used constraint system, which shouldn't
be required, second - it expects the type to be always present in
`ContextualTypeInfo` but that's not the case for some patterns.
Resolves: rdar://131819800
FunctionRefKind was originally designed to represent
the handling needed for argument labels on function
references, in which the unapplied and compound cases
are effectively the same. However it has since been
adopted in a bunch of other places where the
spelling of the function reference is entirely
orthogonal to the application level.
Split out the application level from the
"is compound" bit. Should be NFC. I've left some
FIXMEs for non-NFC changes that I'll address in a
follow-up.
If location (member) isn't mutable in the current context
or there are other problems at this location, increase impact
of the fix since it compounds the problem.
Some invalid specializations were previously allowed by the compiler
and we found some existing code that used that (albeit invalid) syntax,
so we need to stage that error as a warning until Swift 6 language mode
to avoid source compatibility break.
Resolves: rdar://134740240
Always add constraints, find fixes during simplify.
New separate fix for allow generic function specialization.
Improve parse heuristic for isGenericTypeDisambiguatingToken.
Degrade concrete type specialization fix to warning for macros.
Always add constraints, find fixes during simplify.
New separate fix for allow generic function specialization.
Improve parse heuristic for isGenericTypeDisambiguatingToken.
Control enforcement of member import visibility requirements via a new option,
instead of piggy-backing on the existing IgnoreAccessControl option. Adopt the
option when doing fallback lookups for unviable members so that the compiler
can diagnose the reason that a member is inaccessible more reliably.
Previously, with MemberImportVisibility enabled decls with the package access
level could be mis-diagnosed as inaccessible due to their access level when
really they were inaccessible due to a missing import.
Resolves rdar://131501862.
Make sure `CouldNotInferPlaceholderType` can
produce a diagnostic for a `PlaceholderType`
locator element, and avoid emitting an extra
diagnostic for a placeholder type in an invalid
position.
This will ensure that we do not break anyone who has adopted APIs like
CheckedContinuation.resume that now have sending parameters.
An example of where this can come up is shown by the ProcessType in SwiftToolsCore:
```swift
@available(macOS 10.15, iOS 13.0, tvOS 13.0, watchOS 6.0, *)
@discardableResult
public func waitUntilExit() async throws -> ProcessResult {
try await withCheckedThrowingContinuation { continuation in
DispatchQueue.processConcurrent.async {
self.waitUntilExit(continuation.resume(with:))
}
}
}
```
This fails to compile since self.waitUntilExit doesn't expect a function that
takes a sending parameter. We want to give people time to fix such issues.
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
Removing the old, ad-hoc diagnostics code improves the diagnostics we
emit, since the existing diagnostics for missing conformances is already
pretty good.
rdar://127369509
