Rather than type-checking captures as separate declarations during
pre-check, generate constraints and apply solutions to captures in
the same manner as other pattern bindings within a constraint
system.
Fixes SR-3186 / rdar://problem/64647232.
If we're matching the trailing closure at the end but haven't seen any
mismatches yet, consider the trailing closure to be a mismatch.
This function probably needs to be rewritten in terms of
matchCallArguments(), because it is performing an incorrect
approximation of label matching that doesn't work for multiple
trailing closures.
The VDUC was missing a class of AST nodes that can bind variables:
patterns in switch statements. For these, it was falling back to
requesting a simple replacement of the bound variable name with _. But
for patterns, this means there's a two-step dance the user has to go
through where the first fixit does this:
.pattern(let x) -> .pattern(let _)
Then a second round of compilation would emit a fixit to do this:
.pattern(let _) -> .pattern(_)
Instead, detect "simple" variable bindings - for now, variable patterns
that are immediately preceded by a `let` or `var` binding pattern - and
collapse two steps into one.
Resolves rdar://47240768
VarPattern is today used to implement both 'let' and 'var' pattern bindings, so
today is already misleading. The reason why the name Var was chosen was done b/c
it is meant to represent a pattern that performs 'variable binding'. Given that
I am going to add a new 'inout' pattern binding to this, it makes sense to
give it now a better fitting name before I make things more confusing.
This change makes:
* #file compatible with #fileID in “Swift 6 mode”
* #file compatible with #filePath and #fileID in Swift 5 mode
* #file in Swift 5 mode code compatible with #file in “Swift 6 mode” code
This should keep anyone from seeing XCTAssert-wrapping noise until they adopt “Swift 6 mode” (whatever version that ends up actually being).
Extracts the list of magic identifier literal kinds into a separate file and updates a lot of code to use macro metaprogramming instead of naming half a dozen cases manually. This is a complicated change, but it should be NFC.
```
class Generic<T> {
@objc dynamic func method() {}
}
extension Generic {
@_dynamicReplacement(for:method())
func replacement() {}
}
```
The standard mechanism of using Objective-C categories for dynamically
replacing @objc methods in generic classes does not work.
Instead we mark the native entry point as replaceable.
Because this affects all @objc methods in generic classes (whether there
is a replacement or not) by making the native entry point
`[dynamically_replaceable]` (regardless of optimization mode) we guard this by
the -enable-implicit-dynamic flag because we are late in the release cycle.
* Replace isNativeDynamic and isObjcDynamic by calls to shouldUse*Dispatch and
shouldUse*Replacement
This disambiguates between which dispatch method we should use at call
sites and how these methods should implement dynamic function
replacement.
* Don't emit the method entry for @_dynamicReplacement(for:) of generic class
methods
There is not way to call this entry point since we can't generate an
objective-c category for generic classes.
rdar://63679357
Reverse the polarity of the "checked in context" bit for ClosureExpr
to "separately checked", which simplifies the AST walker logic (to
"should we walk separately type-checked closure bodies?") and
eliminates single-expression closures as a separate case to consider.
Rather than using various "applied function builder" and "is single
expression body" checks to determine whether a closure was
type-checked in its enclosing expression, record in the closure
expression whether it actually *was* type-checked as part of its
enclosing expression.
The parser used to rewrite
if let x: T
into
if let x: T?
This transformation is correct at face value, but relied on being able
to construct TypeReprs with bogus source locations. Instead of having
the parser kick semantic analysis into shape, let's perform this
reinterpretation when we resolve if-let patterns in statement
conditions.
Register DynamicSubscriptExpr's index expression
as a call argument in MiscDiagnostics to avoid it
being diagnosed as a single element labelled tuple.
Resolves SR-12799.
This simplifies fixing the master-next build. Upstream LLVM already
has a copy of this function, so on master-next we only need to delete
the Swift copy, reducing the potential for merge conflicts.
Like switch cases, a catch clause may now include a comma-
separated list of patterns. The body will be executed if any
one of those patterns is matched.
This patch replaces `CatchStmt` with `CaseStmt` as the children
of `DoCatchStmt` in the AST. This necessitates a number of changes
throughout the compiler, including:
- Parser & libsyntax support for the new syntax and AST structure
- Typechecking of multi-pattern catches, including those which
contain bindings.
- SILGen support
- Code completion updates
- Profiler updates
- Name lookup changes
We used to take all the captures of a local function and treat them all
as read and write usages of vars from an outer scope. Instead, let's
refactor the analysis to walk into local functions.
`_` or discard assignment expression should only be used on the left-hand
side of the assignment expression. Incorrect uses are easy to detect during
constraint generation which also allows us to avoid complications related
to other diagnostics when `_` is used incorrectly.
if the closure had a function builder transform applied.
This way, function builder closures can have syntactic restrictions
diagnosed the same way as other expressions.
When wrapping a function which is supposed to capture the caller’s location, there’s always a risk that the wrapper won’t capture the information the wrapped function wants; for instance, you might pass `(…, line, column)` where the callee expected `(…, column, line)`.
This commit emits a warning when a call passes an explicit argument to something that has a default argument, and that explicit argument is itself a parameter with a default argument, and both parameters use magic identifiers, but they use *different* magic identifiers. This is partially in support of concise #file, but applies to all magic identifiers.
Fixes rdar://problem/58588633.
* WIP implementation
* Cleanup implementation
* Install backedge rather than storing array reference
* Add diagnostics
* Add missing parameter to ResultFinderForTypeContext constructor
* Fix tests for correct fix-it language
* Change to solution without backedge, change lookup behavior
* Improve diagnostics for weak captures and captures under different names
* Remove ghosts of implementations past
* Address review comments
* Reorder member variable initialization
* Fix typos
* Exclude value types from explicit self requirements
* Add tests
* Add implementation for AST lookup
* Add tests
* Begin addressing review comments
* Re-enable AST scope lookup
* Add fixme
* Pull fix-its into a separate function
* Remove capturedSelfContext tracking from type property initializers
* Add const specifiers to arguments
* Address review comments
* Fix string literals
* Refactor implicit self diagnostics
* Add comment
* Remove trailing whitespace
* Add tests for capture list across multiple lines
* Add additional test
* Fix typo
* Remove use of ?: to fix linux build
* Remove second use of ?:
* Rework logic for finding nested self contexts
This allows us use an OptionSet parameter for
the request (as currently we can't directly use it
as a parameter due to not having an == definition
for it). It also allows us to regain default
arguments for the source loc and flag parameters.
When inside a declaration or extension of TypeName, humans usually don't write
the full typename like #selector(TypeName.foo), but instead prefer the neater
form #selector(self.foo). The compiler has enough information to do this too.
Fixes rdar://problem/2528469
