With both force-single-frontend-invocation and embed-bitcode, we create
CompileJobAction and BackendJobAction, similar to how we handle embed-bitcode
with StandarCompile.
This commit should only affect Bitcode mode.
rdar://20796819
Swift SVN r28129
- Add frontend and standard library build support for tvOS.
- Add frontend support for watchOS.
watchOS standard library builds are still disabled during SDK bring-up.
To build for TVOS, specify --tvos to build-script.
To build for watchOS, specify --watchos to build-script (not yet supported).
This patch does not include turning on full tests for TVOS or watchOS, and
will be included in a follow-up patch.
Swift SVN r26278
Together with -wmo it enables multi-threaded compilation.
I didn't want to reuse the -j option for this, because -num-threads (even if n == 1) does change the generated code.
For details see commit message of r25930.
Swift SVN r26258
Later this should be derived from the target so cross-compilation
does the right thing, but for now this at least makes it so that
it does the right thing for the non-cross-compile case.
Swift SVN r25564
With -embed-bitcode, we will invoke swift twice, once to generate the bitcode
file, the second time to perform code generation on the bitcode file.
For now, -embed-bitcode causes -incremental builds to not be incremental,
because of potential issues of mixing the two.
rdar://19048891
Swift SVN r25559
These aren't inherently incompatible, but today it would do nothing useful,
and using both flags together causes problems (see previous commit).
rdar://problem/19669432
Swift SVN r25389
Also, normalize the target triple up front, so that we're never dealing
with non-normalized triples in the driver unless explicitly asking for
the original user option.
rdar://problem/18065292
Swift SVN r24563
If certain command-line arguments change, the results of the last
compilation aren't reusable, i.e. we can't do an incremental build.
Do a full rebuild when we detect that this happens.
(Which command-line options? Conservatively assume all of them, /except/
those with the new DoesNotAffectIncrementalBuild flag in Options.td.)
Swift SVN r24385
This is mostly just a matter of not throwing away mtimes we were already
looking up. We can compare these values to the mtimes of cross-module
dependencies to find out what's been updated.
Part of rdar://problem/19270920
Swift SVN r24336
of 'bin/swift-update' with the related frontend options.
'swift-update' will be the tool for producing diffs to update swift code to the
latest version.
Swift SVN r24287
r23968 wrote out a record of which source files were included in a build,
and whether they were succesfully compiled or not...and if not, whether
they were out of date because of a cascading or non-cascading dependency.
This commit uses that information to decide what files might need to be
rebuilt even if a particular input doesn't change and doesn't appear to
have any changed dependencies. The two interesting cases are:
- A file was going to be built last time, but the build was halted
because of an error. Build it this time.
- One of the files was removed and thus we've lost a source of dependency
information; rebuild everything!
rdar://problem/19270980
Swift SVN r24018
This is important because we might get part-way through the full
compilation, overwriting swiftdeps files as we go, and then encounter an
error. We don't want to lose information about any decls that have been
removed since the previous compile, so we propagate forward the information
we already have by saving it to a "build record" file.
More simply, this is necessary to track when a file is removed from a target.
The next commit will handle reading in this file at the start of a build.
Swift SVN r23968
Add -whole-module-optimization option as synonym of
-force-single-frontend-invocation (for now). Add support for
-output-file-map when using -whole-module-optimization with multiple
input files -- the key for the single output file's map is the empty string.
<rdar://problem/18603795>
Swift SVN r23625
This was being staged as -emit-reference-dependencies, but it's affecting
a lot more than that. Eventually for command line builds this should also
preserve intermediate build outputs (like .o and .swiftmodule) for use in
later builds, rather than putting them in $TMPDIR and deleting them after.
This option is still hidden.
Swift SVN r23295
This will be used to test dependency analysis by substituting a different
executable to use as the frontend.
For debugging purposes only.
Swift SVN r23272
Previously we had three separate instances of iterating from TY_INVALID+1
to TY_LAST, completely breaking type safety. Now we have a nice little
wrapper that takes a closure, which should inline down to the same thing
anyway.
Also, eliminate TY_LAST and just use TY_INVALID as our sentinel.
Swift SVN r23222
The Swift compiler is always fed the entire list of files in a module.
If it's told to track dependencies, though, it should look to see if it
actually needs to recompile all of its inputs. The first step in this is
to see which files are actually dirty, which it does by comparing the mtime
of each source file with the mtime of its output object file. If a source
file is not dirty, it only needs to be rebuilt if it depends on something
in a dirty file.
Nothing actually uses this information yet, but we can print it with
-driver-print-bindings!
Swift SVN r23221
This just adds another possible output kind and forwards it to the frontend.
Note that in builds without an output map, this will just dump the dependencies
next to the output file, which is a temp file whose name is chosen randomly.
That's not so useful, but we can fix it later.
Part of rdar://problem/15353101
Swift SVN r23220
...and rename Command to Job (previously the name of the base class).
We never generated job lists directly contained in other job lists, so
let's not even worry about this case. We may some day need to break Job
out into separate subclasses (Clang has Command and FallbackCommand in
addition to JobList), but we should be able to keep the list separate.
No intended functionality change.
Swift SVN r23144
The name -gnone was chosen by analogy with -O and -Onone. Like -O/-Onone,
the last option on the command line wins.
The immediate use case for this is because we want to be able to run the
tests with -g injected into every command line, but some tests will fail
when debug info is included. Those particular tests can be explicitly marked
-gnone.
rdar://problem/18636307
Swift SVN r22777
We use the basename to generate the private-discriminator. Why just the
basename? Because we want projects checked out in different locations to
still have a chance of generating identical binaries, and (at least for now)
private symbols still have external linkage.
Part of rdar://problem/17632175
Swift SVN r21845
Actually, reject SDK directories whose names match
"*OSX<version>(.Internal)?.sdk" on OS X with a version older than 10.10
"*OS7*" on iOS
"*Simulator7*" on iOS
We only really care about 10.9 anyway, but just in case people install the
one-previous version of iOS...
<rdar://problem/17951615>
Swift SVN r21100
Previously, the driver would unconditionally create a CompileJobAction if it was
in SingleCompile or Immediate mode. If there were no inputs, though, the driver
would end up asserting later because it could not create a Command for a
CompileJobAction with no inputs.
To match the behavior of the StandardCompile mode, avoid creating a
CompileJobAction if there are no inputs. (This change only affects -v, since it
disables the 'no input files' error which otherwise prevents this condition from
being hit.)
Additionally, added a test to check swiftc's behavior when no inputs are
provided.
Swift SVN r20900
