I am doing this so I can mark requires as being on a mutable non-Sendable base
from a Sendable value.
I also took this as an opportunity to compress the size of PartitionOp to be 24
bytes instead of 40 bytes.
Previously, when we saw any Sendable type and attempted to look up an underlying
tracked value, we just bailed. This caused an issue in situations like the
following where we need to emit an error:
```swift
func test() {
var x = 5
Task.detached { x += 1 }
print(x)
}
```
The problem with the above example is that despite value in x being Sendable,
'x' is actually in a non-Sendable box. We are passing that non-Sendable box into
the detached task by reference causing a race against the read from the
non-Sendable box later in the function. In SE-0414, this is explicitly banned in
the section called "Accessing Sendable fields of non-Sendable types after weak
transferring". In this example, the box is the non-Sendable type and the value
stored in the box is the Sendable field.
To properly represent this, we need to change how the underlying object part of
our layering returns underlying objects and vends TrackableValues to the actual
analysis for addresses. NOTE: We leave the current behavior alone for SIL
objects.
By doing this, in situations like the above, despite have a Sendable value (the
integer), we are able to ensure that we require that the non-Sendable box
containing the integer is not used after we have sent it into the other Task
despite us not actually using the box directly.
Below I describe the representation change in more detail and describe the
various cases here. In this commit, I only change the representation and do not
actually use the new base information. I do that in the next commit to make this
change easier for others to read and review. I made sure that change was NFC by
leaving RegionAnalysis.cpp:727 returning an optional.none if the value found was
a Sendable value.
----
The way we modify the representation is that we instead of just returning a
single TrackedValue return a pair of tracked values, one for the base and one
for the "value". We return this pair in what is labeled a
"TrackableValueLookupResult":
```c++
struct TrackableValueLookupResult {
TrackableValue value;
std::optional<TrackableValue> base;
TrackableValueLookupResult(TrackableValue value)
: value(value), base() {}
TrackableValueLookupResult(TrackableValue value, TrackableValue base)
: value(value), base(base) {}
};
```
In the case where we are accessing a projection path out of a non-Sendable type
that contains all non-Sendable fields, we do not do anything different than we
did previously. We just walk up from use->def until we find the access path base
which we use as the representative of the leaf of the chain and return
TrackableValueLookupResult(access path base).
In the case where we are accessing a Sendable leaf type projected from a
non-Sendable base, we store the leaf type as our value and return the actual
non-Sendable base in TrackableValueLookupResult. Importantly this ensures that
even though our Sendable value will be ignored by the rest of the analysis, the
rest of the analysis will ensure that our base is required if our base is a var
that had been escaped into a closure by reference.
In the case where we are accessing a non-Sendable leaf type projected from a
Sendable type (which we may have continued to be projected subsequently out of
additional Sendable types or a non-Sendable type), we make the last type on the
projection path before the Sendable type, the value of the leaf type. We return
the eventual access path base as our underlying value base. The logic here is
that since we are dealing with access paths, our access path can only consist of
projections into a recursive value type (e.x.: struct/tuple/enum... never a
class). The minute that we hit a pointer or a class, we will no longer be along
the access path since we will be traversing a non-contiguous piece of
memory (consider a class vs the class's storage) and the traversal from use->def
will stop. Thus, we know that there are only two ways we can get a field in that
value type to be Sendable and have a non-Sendable field:
1. The struct can be @unchecked Sendable. In such a case, we want to treat the
leaf field as part of its own disconnected region.
2. The struct can be global actor isolated. In such a case, we want to treat the
leaf field as part of the global actor's region rather than whatever actor.
The reason why we return the eventual access path base as our tracked value base
is that we want to ensure that if the var value had been escaped by reference,
we can require that the var not be sent since we are going to attempt to access
state from the var in order to get the global actor guarded struct that we are
going to attempt to extract our non-Sendable leaf value out of.
Addressable parameters must remain indirect.
Incidentally also fixes an obvious latent bug in which all specialization was
disabled if any metatypes could not be specialized.
Fixes rdar://145687827 (Crash of inline-stored Span properties with optimizations)
Specifically,
1. UseDefChainVisitor::actorIsolation is dead. I removed it to prevent any
confusion/thoughts that it actually found isolation. I also removed it from
UnderlyingTrackedValue since that was the only place where we were using it. I
left UnderlyingTrackedValue there in case I need to add additional state there
in the future.
2. Now that UseDefChainVisitor is only used to find the base of a value (while
not looking through Sendable addresses), I renamed it to
AddressBaseComputingVisitor.
3. I renamed UseDefChainVisitor::isMerge to isProjectedFromAggregate. That is
actually what we use it for. I also added a comment explaining what it is used
for.
Fixes a false alarm in case of recursive calls with different type parameters.
For example:
```
protocol P {
associatedtype E: P
}
func noRecursionMismatchingTypeArgs1<T: P>(_ t: T.Type) {
if T.self == Int.self {
return
}
noRecursionMismatchingTypeArgs1(T.E.self)
}
```
The body of a function has to be re-analyzed for every call
site of the function, which is very expensive and if the
body is not changed would produce the same result.
This takes about ~10% from swift-syntax overall build time
in release configuration.
* move the "SILCombine passes" into a separate file `Simplifications.def` which lives in the SILCombiner directory
* group passes by kind
* rename PASS -> LEGACY_PASS and add a comment to make clear that new passes should be implemented in Swift
NFC
Casts always work with formal rather than lowered types.
This fixes a potential bug when lowered types are different than formal types, like function types.
* Reimplement most of the logic in Swift as an Instruction simplification and remove the old code from SILCombine
* support more cases of existential archetype replacements:
For example:
```
%0 = alloc_stack $any P
%1 = init_existential_addr %0, $T
use %1
```
is transformed to
```
%0 = alloc_stack $T
use %0
```
Also, if the alloc_stack is already an opened existential and the concrete type is known,
replace it as well:
```
%0 = metatype $@thick T.Type
%1 = init_existential_metatype %0, $@thick any P.Type
%2 = open_existential_metatype %1 : $@thick any P.Type to $@thick (@opened("X", P) Self).Type
...
%3 = alloc_stack $@opened("X", any P) Self
use %3
```
is transformed to
```
...
%3 = alloc_stack $T
use %3
```
If an apply uses an existential archetype (`@opened("...")`) and the concrete type is known, replace the existential archetype with the concrete type
1. in the apply's substitution map
2. in the arguments, e.g. by inserting address casts
For example:
```
%5 = apply %1<@opend("...")>(%2) : <τ_0_0> (τ_0_0) -> ()
```
->
```
%4 = unchecked_addr_cast %2 to $*ConcreteType
%5 = apply %1<ConcreteType>(%4) : <τ_0_0> (τ_0_0) -> ()
```
Replace `unconditional_checked_cast` to an existential metatype with an `init_existential_metatype`, it the source is a conforming type.
Note that init_existential_metatype is better than unconditional_checked_cast because it does not need to do any runtime casting.
So far a `SILCombineSimplifiable` could only replace a SILCombine visit implementation.
With the `SWIFT_SILCOMBINE_PASS_WITH_LEGACY` (to be used in Passes.def) it's possible to keep an existing C++ implementation and on top of that add a Swift Simplification pass.
Regardless of consumes of copies, if the original lexical value is not
consumed on a dead-end path, it must remain live to that dead-end.
rdar://145226757
From talking with @dgregor, it became clear that this comment was easily
interpreted as saying that AssignFresh always introduced a disconnected value...
which is not the case. Instead, AssignFresh just introduces a new value that
could have any form of isolation. The actual isolation of the value is assigned
via tryToTrackValue and eventually SILIsolationInfo::get().
CSE uses OSSA rauw which creates copies and copies that are created to optimize
across borrow scopes are unoptimizable. This PR avoids this situation for now.
executing unknown code
This means we have to claw back some performance by recognizing harmless
releases.
Such as releases on types we known don't call a deinit with unknown
side-effects.
rdar://143497196
rdar://143141695
It was used in the old redundant-load- and redundant-store-elimination passes which were replaced by new implementations.
TypeExpansionAnalysis is not used anymore.
It's sufficient just to have a struct with a kind and a value. There
aren't any cases where the payload's original type benefits from being
statically preserved--they're only ever obtained as `SILValue`s. Keep
the type safety by way of constructors.
