When MemberImportVisibility is enabled we failed to find certain base
methods from the extensions when said base methods are imported from
C++.
rdar://154887575
This is an accepted spelling for the attribute. This commit
also renames the feature flag from `ExtensibleAttribute` to
`NonexhaustiveAttribute` to match the spelling of the attribute.
If we fail to resolve the value type for a value generic parameter,
previously we would have returned a null Type, causing crashes
downstream. Instead, return an ErrorType, leaving a null Type for
cases where the generic parameter isn't a value generic at all.
rdar://154856417
Resolves rdar://152598492
Consider the following Swift, adapted from a real-world framework:
```swift
@available(macOS 10.8, *)
@_originallyDefinedIn(module: "another", macOS 11.0)
public struct SimpleStruct {}
@available(macOS 12.0, iOS 13.0, *)
public extension SimpleStruct {
struct InnerStruct {}
}
```
In this scenario, `SimpleStruct` was originally in a module called
`another`, but was migrated to this module around the time of macOS
11.0. Since then, the module was ported to iOS and gained a nested type
`SimpleStruct.InnerStruct`. When mangling USRs for this nested type, the
result differs depending on whether we're targeting macOS or iOS.
They're mostly the same, but the macOS build yields a USR with an `AAE`
infix, designating that the `InnerStruct` was defined in an extension
from a module with the name of the base module. On iOS, this infix does
not exist.
The reason this is happening is because of the implementation of
`getAlternateModuleName` checking the availability spec in the
`@_originallyDefinedIn` attribute against the currently active target.
If the target matches the spec, then the alternate module name is
reported, otherwise the real module name is. Since the iOS build reports
the real module name, the mangling code doesn't bother including the
extension-context infix, instead just opting to include the parent
type's name and moving on.
This PR routes around this issue by passing the
`RespectOriginallyDefinedIn` variable to the
`ExtensionDecl::isInSameDefiningModule` method, and using that to skip
the alternate module name entirely. It also sets
`RespectOriginallyDefinedIn` to `false` in more places when mangling
USRs, but i'm not 100% confident that it was all necessary. The goal was
to make USRs more consistent across platforms, regardless of the
surrounding context.
This patch makes sure we don't get warnings in strict memory safe mode
when using shared references. Those types are reference counted so we
are unlikely to run into lifetime errors.
rdar://151039766
We would previously unconditionally create the accessor as a throwing
accessor irrespective of the parameter. This seems like an oversight and
results in an incorrect accessor being formed. This was caught while
trying to improve the ClangImporter's handling of aliasing macros.
Initially this declaration is going to be used to determine
per-file default actor isolation i.e. `using @MainActor` and
`using nonisolated` but it could be extended to support other
file-global settings in the future.
This wasn't really sound since it could result in source ranges that
have different buffers for the start and end loc. Instead, adjust
the parser logic to look at the brace range.
Handle PatternBindingDecls with missing var locations, which can
happen for loop iterator vars, and FuncDecls with missing name and
func locations, which can happen for `defer`. Also while here make
sure we set the source location of a parser-produced ErrorExpr.
Due to a bug in how macros on nodes imported from clang are evaluated,
their function body is not always type checked. This forces type
checking before silgen of a macro originating on a node imported from
clang, to prevent crashing in silgen.
rdar://150940383
Similarly to how https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/70564 configures 'ClangImporter's 'CodeGenerator' using Swift's compilation target triple, we must use the versioned version of the 'isWeakImported' query to determine linkage for imported Clang symbols.
Don't bind references to storage to use (new ABI) coroutine accessors
unless they're guaranteed to be available. For example, when building
against a resilient module that has coroutine accessors, they can only
be used if the deployment target is >= the version of Swift that
includes the feature.
rdar://148783895
Several callers of `AbstractStorageDecl::getAccessStrategy` only cared
about whether the the access would be via physical storage. Before
adding more arguments to `getAccessStrategy` for which such callers
would have to pass a sentinel value, add a convenience method for this.
