which tell you what the problem is, not just that you have one.
- Enhance diagnostics to be more specific about function calls producing
rvalues.
Swift SVN r28939
into account accesibility, assignments to self in a non-mutating
method (consistently), recursive components of an lvalue that makes it
non-settable, etc. Now we tell you what the *problem* was, instead of
just whining.
This fixes:
<rdar://problem/19370429> QoI: fixit to add "mutating" when assigning to a member of self in a struct
<rdar://problem/17632908> QoI: Modifying struct member in non-mutating function produces difficult to understand error message
in their full generality.
Swift SVN r28867
Add a new option, TVO_MustBeMaterializable, to
TypeVariableType::Implementation, and set it for type variables
resulting from opening a generic type. This solution isn't complete (we
don't yet copy the non-materializable bit on unification of type
variables, and it's possible to bind a must-be-materializable type
variable to a type with type variables that later get bound to
non-materializable types) but it addresses all reported crashes for this
issue.
<rdar://problem/20807269> Crash in non-materializable type
Swift SVN r28792
Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
fixing:
<rdar://problem/18400194> Parenthesized function expression crashes the compiler
it still grosses me out that we're using diagnostics machinery for correctness of
type checking default arguments :-(
Swift SVN r27855
We now produce tailored diagnostics for assignment operators that are passed a non-mutable LHS,
e.g.:
t.swift:14:3: error: cannot pass 'let' value 'x' to mutating binary operator '/='
x /= 19
~ ^
t.swift:13:1: note: change 'let' to 'var' to make it mutable
let x = 42
^~~
var
Swift SVN r27780
- <rdar://problem/16306600> QoI: passing a 'let' value as an inout results in an unfriendly diagnostic
- <rdar://problem/16927246> provide a fixit to change "let" to "var" if needing to mutate a variable
We now refer to an inout argument as such, e.g.:
t.swift:7:9: error: cannot pass 'let' value 'a' as inout argument
swap(&a, &b)
^
we also produce a note with a fixit to rewrite let->var in trivial cases where mutation is
being assed for, e.g.:
t.swift:3:3: note: change 'let' to 'var' to make it mutable
let a = 42
^~~
var
The note is produced by both Sema and DI.
Swift SVN r27774
We now produce diagnostics like:
- cannot pass 'let' value 'a' to mutating unary operator '++'
- cannot pass get-only property 'b' to mutating unary operator '++'
- cannot pass immutable value of type 'Int64' to mutating unary operator '++'
Swift SVN r27772
Add syntax "[#Color(...)#]" for object literals, to be used by
Playgrounds for inline color wells etc. The arguments are forwarded to
the relevant constructor (although we will probably change this soon,
since (colorLiteralRed:... blue:... green:... alpha) is kind of
verbose). Add _ColorLiteralConvertible and _ImageLiteralConvertible
protocols, and link them to the new expressions in the type checker.
CSApply replaces the object literal expressions with a call to the
appropriate protocol witness.
Swift SVN r27479
A non-throwing function can be a trivial subtype of a throwing
function. Encode this rule more directly, introduce some additional
tests to ensure that we get the behavior right where we need exact
matches, and add a failure kind with custom diagnostic for cases where
function types mismatch due to 'throws'.
Swift SVN r27255
This unblocks standard library work by preventing us from going exponential when extending existing struct types to have failable initializers. (rdar://problem/20336356)
On my laptop, it also results in a 7% end-to-end improvement in the time it takes to run our unit tests under DebugAssert (previously: 591.63s, now: 552.64s). Though, as usual, YMMV.
Swift SVN r27156
Previously some parts of the compiler referred to them as "fields",
and most referred to them as "elements". Use the more generic 'elements'
nomenclature because that's what we refer to other things in the compiler
(e.g. the elements of a bracestmt).
At the same time, make the API better by providing "getElement" consistently
and using it, instead of getElements()[i].
NFC.
Swift SVN r26894
Penalize solutions that involve 'as' -> 'as!' changes by recording a Fix
when simplifying the corresponding checked-cast constraint.
<rdar://problem/19724719> Type checker thinks "(optionalNSString ?? nonoptionalNSString) as String" is a forced cast
Swift SVN r25061
Don't emit multiple diagnostics for the same destination type -
this makes diagnostics less noisy where there are multiple overloads
with the same type.
Also, move the check for multiple overloads into
diagnoseFailureForCallExpr.
Swift SVN r24993
When threading a @noescape, @noreturn, or @autoclosure parameter through
to a function that doesn't expect one of those attributes, multiple
overload matches may cause the diagnostic to be dropped on the floor,
causing a crash in AST verification. If there is more than one failure
recorded for these attribute mismatches, don't fall back to the
contextual type diagnostics.
Fixes crash: rdar://problem/19704523
Swift SVN r24974
When generating constraints for an 'as' expression, consider the
possibility that the code is supposed to be 'as!' instead of 'as'. Emit
the appropriate fixit if that branch of the disjunction is chosen by the
constraint solver.
This is a more comprehensive fix for <rdar://problem/19499340> than the
one in r24815.
Swift SVN r24872
- Situations where the type of a return statement's result expression doesn't line up with the function's type annotation.
- Situations where the type of an initializer expression doesn't line up with its declaration's type pattern.
- Situations where we assume a conversion to a built-in protocol must take place, such as in if-statement conditionals.
(Addresses rdar://problem/19224776, rdar://problem/19422107, rdar://problem/19422156, rdar://problem/19547806 and lots of other dupes.)
Swift SVN r24853
- Closures that are comprised of only a single return statement are now considered to be "single expression" closures. (rdar://problem/17550847)
- Unannotated single expression closures with non-void return types can now be used in void contexts. (rdar://problem/17228969)
- Situations where a multi-statement closure's type could not be inferred because of the lack of a return-type annotation are now properly diagnosed. (rdar://problem/17212107)
I also encountered a number of crashers along the way, which should now be fixed.
Swift SVN r24817
Fix diagnostics for 'as' and 'as!' expressions by ensuring that the
conversion constraint used to generate them actually corresponds to the
expression in question. Add tests from 19495142.
Swift SVN r24547
Previously the "as" keyword could either represent coercion or or forced
downcasting. This change separates the two notions. "as" now only means
type conversion, while the new "as!" operator is used to perform forced
downcasting. If a program uses "as" where "as!" is called for, we emit a
diagnostic and fixit.
Internally, this change removes the UnresolvedCheckedCastExpr class, in
favor of directly instantiating CoerceExpr when parsing the "as"
operator, and ForcedCheckedCastExpr when parsing the "as!" operator.
Swift SVN r24253
These changes make the following improvements to how we generate diagnostics for expression typecheck failure:
- Customizing a diagnostic for a specific expression kind is as easy as adding a new method to the FailureDiagnosis class,
and does not require intimate knowledge of the constraint solver’s inner workings.
- As part of this patch, I’ve introduced specialized diagnostics for call, binop, unop, subscript, assignment and inout
expressions, but we can go pretty far with this.
- This also opens up the possibility to customize diagnostics not just for the expression kind, but for the specific types
involved as well.
- For the purpose of presenting accurate type info, partially-specialized subexpressions are individually re-typechecked
free of any contextual types. This allows us to:
- Properly surface subexpression errors.
- Almost completely avoid any type variables in our diagnostics. In cases where they could not be eliminated, we now
substitute in "_".
- More accurately indicate the sources of errors.
- We do a much better job of diagnosing disjunction failures. (So no more nonsensical ‘UInt8’ error messages.)
- We now present reasonable error messages for overload resolution failures, informing the user of partially-matching
parameter lists when possible.
At the very least, these changes address the following bugs:
<rdar://problem/15863738> More information needed in type-checking error messages
<rdar://problem/16306600> QoI: passing a 'let' value as an inout results in an unfriendly diagnostic
<rdar://problem/16449805> Wrong error for struct-to-protocol downcast
<rdar://problem/16699932> improve type checker diagnostic when passing Double to function taking a Float
<rdar://problem/16707914> fatal error: Can't unwrap Optional.None…Optional.swift, line 75 running Master-Detail Swift app built from template
<rdar://problem/16785829> Inout parameter fixit
<rdar://problem/16900438> We shouldn't leak the internal type placeholder
<rdar://problem/16909379> confusing type check diagnostics
<rdar://problem/16951521> Extra arguments to functions result in an unhelpful error
<rdar://problem/16971025> Two Terrible Diagnostics
<rdar://problem/17007804> $T2 in compiler error string
<rdar://problem/17027483> Terrible diagnostic
<rdar://problem/17083239> Mysterious error using find() with Foundation types
<rdar://problem/17149771> Diagnostic for closure with no inferred return value leaks type variables
<rdar://problem/17212371> Swift poorly-worded error message when overload resolution fails on return type
<rdar://problem/17236976> QoI: Swift error for incorrectly typed parameter is confusing/misleading
<rdar://problem/17304200> Wrong error for non-self-conforming protocols
<rdar://problem/17321369> better error message for inout protocols
<rdar://problem/17539380> Swift error seems wrong
<rdar://problem/17559593> Bogus locationless "treating a forced downcast to 'NSData' as optional will never produce 'nil'" warning
<rdar://problem/17567973> 32-bit error message is really far from the mark: error: missing argument for parameter 'withFont' in call
<rdar://problem/17671058> Wrong error message: "Missing argument for parameter 'completion' in call"
<rdar://problem/17704609> Float is not convertible to UInt8
<rdar://problem/17705424> Poor error reporting for passing Doubles to NSColor: extra argument 'red' in call
<rdar://problem/17743603> Swift compiler gives misleading error message in "NSLayoutConstraint.constraintsWithVisualFormat("x", options: 123, metrics: nil, views: views)"
<rdar://problem/17784167> application of operator to generic type results in odd diagnostic
<rdar://problem/17801696> Awful diagnostic trying to construct an Int when .Int is around
<rdar://problem/17863882> cannot convert the expression's type '()' to type 'Seq'
<rdar://problem/17865869> "has different argument names" diagnostic when parameter defaulted-ness differs
<rdar://problem/17937593> Unclear error message for empty array literal without type context
<rdar://problem/17943023> QoI: compiler displays wrong error when a float is provided to a Int16 parameter in init method
<rdar://problem/17951148> Improve error messages for expressions inside if statements by pre-evaluating outside the 'if'
<rdar://problem/18057815> Unhelpful Swift error message
<rdar://problem/18077468> Incorrect argument label for insertSubview(...)
<rdar://problem/18079213> 'T1' is not identical to 'T2' lacks directionality
<rdar://problem/18086470> Confusing Swift error message: error: 'T' is not convertible to 'MirrorDisposition'
<rdar://problem/18098995> QoI: Unhelpful compiler error when leaving off an & on an inout parameter
<rdar://problem/18104379> Terrible error message
<rdar://problem/18121897> unexpected low-level error on assignment to immutable value through array writeback
<rdar://problem/18123596> unexpected error on self. capture inside class method
<rdar://problem/18152074> QoI: Improve diagnostic for type mismatch in dictionary subscripting
<rdar://problem/18242160> There could be a better error message when using [] instead of [:]
<rdar://problem/18242812> 6A1021a : Type variable leaked
<rdar://problem/18331819> Unclear error message when trying to set an element of an array constant (Swift)
<rdar://problem/18414834> Bad diagnostics example
<rdar://problem/18422468> Calculation of constant value yields unexplainable error
<rdar://problem/18427217> Misleading error message makes debugging difficult
<rdar://problem/18439742> Misleading error: "cannot invoke" mentions completely unrelated types as arguments
<rdar://problem/18535804> Wrong compiler error from swift compiler
<rdar://problem/18567914> Xcode 6.1. GM, Swift, assignment from Int64 to NSNumber. Warning shown as problem with UInt8
<rdar://problem/18784027> Negating Int? Yields Float
<rdar://problem/17691565> attempt to modify a 'let' variable with ++ results in typecheck error about @lvalue Float
<rdar://problem/17164001> "++" on let value could give a better error message
Swift SVN r23782
Specifically, it's not when
- the conformance is being used within a function body (test included)
- the conformance is being used for or within a private type (test included)
- the conformance is being used to generate a diagnostic string
We're still a bit imprecise in some places (checking ObjC bridging), but
in general this means less of an issue for checking literals.
Swift SVN r23700
