Remove this bit from function decls and closures.
Instead, for closures, infer it from the presence
of a single return or single expression AST node
in the body, which ought to be equivalent, and
automatically takes result builders into
consideration. We can also completely drop this
query from AbstractFunctionDecl, replacing it
instead with a bit on ReturnStmt.
First, "can have an absence of Copyable" is a rather confusing notion,
so the query is flipped to "can be Copyable". Next, it's more robust to
ask if a conformance exists for the TypeDecl to answer that question,
rather than trying to replicate what happens within that conformance
lookup.
Also renames `TypeDecl::isEscapable` to match.
It's not clear that its worth keeping this as a
base class for SerializedAbstractClosure and
SerializedTopLevelCodeDecl, most clients are
interested in the concrete kinds, not only whether
the context is serialized.
Most clients only want to set one of the two
parameters, split it into `setPattern` and
`setInitContext` (the latter of which now
handles calling `setBinding`).
Switch from promising a DeclContext to a
PatternBindingInitializer.
This has a couple of benefits:
- It eliminates a few places where we were force
`cast`'ing to PatternBindingInitializer.
- It improves the clarity of what's being stored,
it's not whatever the parent context of the
initializer is, it's specifically the
PatternBindingInitializer context if it exists.
Due to the duality between the expression and declaration forms of
freestanding macros, we could end up assigning two different discriminators
to what is effectively the same freestanding macro expansion. Across
different source files, this could lead to inconsistent discriminators in
different translation units. Unify the storage of the discriminator to
avoid this issue.
Fixes rdar://116259748
Instead of injecting Copyable & Escapable protocols into every
ExistentialLayout, only add those protocols if the existing protocols
don't already imply them. This simplifies things like `any Error`
protocol, so it still only lists one protocol in its existential layout.
But existentials like `any NoCopyP` still end up with a Copyable in its
layout.
These two requests are effectively doing the same thing to two
different cases within CatchNode. Unify the requests into a single
request, ExplicitCaughtTypeRequest, which operates on a CatchNode.
This also moves the logic for closures with explicitly-specified throws
clauses into the same request, taking it out of the constraint system.
The spelling kind was only ever set to
`StaticSpellingKind::None`, and the static location
was never used for anything (and should be queried
on the storage anyway). This doesn't affect the
computation of `isStatic` since `IsStaticRequest`
already takes the static-ness from the storage for
accessors.
This accidentally started happening when I adjusted getEffectiveAccess to return `Public` for `Package` declarations in #69709. As a result, the optimizer thought it had more opportunities to go after declarations that used to be opaque. Unfortunately, this resulted in a miscompile as the devirtualizer was able to look through now-serialized package (static) functions. In one specific instance, the optimizer created direct calls to hidden accessors instead of going through the dispatch thunk.
Function body macros allow one to introduce a function body for a
particular function, either providing a body for a function that
doesn't have one, or wholesale replacing the body of a function that
was written with a new one.
The "typechecked function body" request was defined to type-check a
function body that is known to be present, and not skipped, and would
assert these conditions, requiring its users to check whether a body
was expected. Often, this means that callers would use `getBody()`
instead, which retrieves the underlying value in whatever form it
happens to be, and assume it has been mutated appropriately.
Make the "typechecked function body" request, triggered by
`getTypecheckedBody()`, more resilient and central. A `NULL` result is
now acceptable, signifying that there is no body. Clients will need to
tolerate NULL results.
* When there is no body but should be one, produce an appropriate
error.
* When there shouldn't be a body but is, produce an appropriate error
* Handle skipping of function bodies here, rather than elsewhere.
Over time, we should move clients off of `getBody` and `hasBody`
entirely, and toward `getTypecheckedBody` or some yet-to-be-introduced
forms like `getBodyAsWritten` for the pre-typechecked body.
As a follow up to https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/69841, clarify the
possible states that initializer expression of a pattern can be in. The
possible states are not checked, checked, and "checked and contextualized"
(which is the new state that was introduced and requestified in the previous
PR). This refactoring encodes the states more explicitly and renames a few
compiler APIs to better align with the new naming. NFC.
