Currently, this is staged in as `_forget`,
as part of SE-390. It can only be used on
`self` for a move-only type within a consuming
method or accessor. There are other rules, see
Sema for the details.
A `forget self` really just consumes self and
performs memberwise destruction of its data.
Thus, the current expansion of this statement
just reuses what we inject into the end of a
deinit.
Parsing of `forget` is "contextual".
By contextual I mean that we do lookahead to
the next token and see if it's identifier-like.
If so, then we parse it as the `forget` statement.
Otherwise, we parse it as though "forget" is an
identifier as part of some expression.
This way, we won't introduce a source break for
people who wrote code that calls a forget
function.
This should make it seamless to change it from
`_forget` to `forget` in the future.
resolves rdar://105795731
Provide ASTWalker with a customization point to specify whether to
check macro arguments (which are type checked but never emitted), the
macro expansion (which is the result of applying the macro and is
actually emitted into the source), or both. Provide answers for the
~115 different ASTWalker visitors throughout the code base.
Fixes rdar://104042945, which concerns checking of effects in
macro arguments---which we shouldn't do.
Extend handling of incomplete multi-line string literals during input in
REPL to also cover raw multi-line strings.
Fixes#52840 and apple/llvm-project#4628
Introduce SingleValueStmtExpr, which allows the
embedding of a statement in an expression context.
This then allows us to parse and type-check `if`
and `switch` statements as expressions, gated
behind the `IfSwitchExpression` experimental
feature for now. In the future,
SingleValueStmtExpr could also be used for e.g
`do` expressions.
For now, only single expression branches are
supported for producing a value from an
`if`/`switch` expression, and each branch is
type-checked independently. A multi-statement
branch may only appear if it ends with a `throw`,
and it may not `break`, `continue`, or `return`.
The placement of `if`/`switch` expressions is also
currently limited by a syntactic use diagnostic.
Currently they're only allowed in bindings,
assignments, throws, and returns. But this could
be lifted in the future if desired.
The "local context" was only used to prevent parsing of closures in a
non-local context, and also string interpolations because they are
similar-ish to closures. However, this isn't something a parser should
decide, so remove this special-case semantic check from the parser and
eliminate the notion of "local context" entirely.
The parser no longer sets local discriminators, and this function is
currently only responsible for adding local type declarations to the
source file. Rename it and remove most of the former callers so it
does just that.
`getValue` -> `value`
`getValueOr` -> `value_or`
`hasValue` -> `has_value`
`map` -> `transform`
The old API will be deprecated in the rebranch.
To avoid merge conflicts, use the new API already in the main branch.
rdar://102362022
In the Swift grammar, the top-level of a source file is a mix of three
different kinds of "items": declarations, statements, and expressions.
However, the existing parser forces all of these into declarations at
parse time, wrapping statements and expressions in TopLevelCodeDecls,
so the primary API for getting the top-level entities in source files
is based on getting declarations.
Start generalizing the representation by storing ASTNode instances at
the top level, rather than declaration pointers, updating many (but
not all!) uses of this API. The walk over declarations is a (cached)
filter to pick out all of the declarations. Existing parsed files are
unaffected (the parser still creates top-level code declarations), but
the new "macro expansion" source file kind skips creating top-level
code declarations so we get the pure parse tree. Additionally, some
generalized clients (like ASTScope lookup) will now look at the list
of items, so they'll be able to walk into statements and expressions
without the intervening TopLevelCodeDecl.
Over time, I'd like to phase out `getTopLevelDecls()` entirely,
relying on the new `getTopLevelItems()` for parsed content. We can
introduce TopLevelCodeDecls more lazily for semantic walks.
Replace the use of bool and pointer returns for
`walkToXXXPre`/`walkToXXXPost`, and instead use
explicit actions such as `Action::Continue(E)`,
`Action::SkipChildren(E)`, and `Action::Stop()`.
There are also conditional variants, e.g
`Action::SkipChildrenIf`, `Action::VisitChildrenIf`,
and `Action::StopIf`.
There is still more work that can be done here, in
particular:
- SourceEntityWalker still needs to be migrated.
- Some uses of `return false` in pre-visitation
methods can likely now be replaced by
`Action::Stop`.
- We still use bool and pointer returns internally
within the ASTWalker traversal, which could likely
be improved.
But I'm leaving those as future work for now as
this patch is already large enough.
Introduce the compiler directive `#_hasSymbol` which will be used to detect whether weakly linked symbols are present at runtime. It is intended for use in combination with `@_weakLinked import` or `-weak-link-at-target`.
```
if #_hasSymbol(foo(_:)) {
foo(42)
}
```
Parsing only; SILGen is coming in a later commit.
Resolves rdar://99342017
This represents labeled statements as an explicit kind of statement and removes the Labeled trait. Any kind of statement is allowed to be labeled in the tree, but we specifically diagnose the syntax elements that aren't allowed to have labels. This homogenizes the way clients deal with statement labels and also makes parser recovery quite a bit easier in the case where we have a label but no actual statement following it.
Introduce support for parsing declaration attributes that occur within
example:
#if hasAttribute(frozen)
@frozen
#endif
public struct X { ... }
will apply to "frozen" attribute to the struct `X`, but only when the
compiler supports the "frozen" attribute.
Correctly determining whether a particular `#if` block contains
attributes to be associated with the following declaration vs.
starting a new declaration requires arbitrary lookahead. The parser
will ensure that at least one of the branches of the `#if` contains an
attribute, and that none of the branches contains something that does
not fit the attribute grammar, before committing to parsing the `#if`
clause as part of the declaration attributes. This lookahead does
occur at the top level (e.g., in the parsing of top-level declarations
and code), but should only need to scan past the first `#if` line to
the following token in the common case.
Unlike other `#if` when used to wrap statements or declarations, we
make no attempt to record the `#if` not taken anywhere in the AST.
This reflects a change in attitude in the design of the AST, because
we have found that trying to represent this information there (e.g.,
via `IfConfigDecl`) complicates clients while providing little value.
This information is best kept in the syntax tree, only.
When recovering from a parser error in an expression, we resumed parsing at a '{'. I assume this was because we wanted to continue inside e.g. an if-body if parsing the condition failed, but it's actually causing more issue because when parsing e.g.
```swift
expr + has - error +
functionTakesClosure {
}
```
we continue parsing at the `{` of the trailing closure, which is a completely garbage location to continue parsing.
The motivating example for this change was (in a result builder)
```swift
Text("\(island.#^COMPLETE^#)")
takeTrailingClosure {}
```
Here `Text(…)` has an error (because it contains a code completion token) and thus we skip `takeTrailingClosure`, effectively parsing
```swift
Text(….) {}
```
which the type checker wasn’t very happy with and thus refused to provide code completion. With this change, we completely drop `takeTrailingClosure {}`. The type checker is a lot happier with that.
Instead of setting the code completion position when parsing the if-statement, which doesn’t create a `CodeCompletionExpr`, parse it as a new top-level expression.
As far as test-cases are concerned, this removes the “RareKeyword” flair from top-level completions in the modified test case. This makes sense IMO.
Previously, when we reached the maximum nesting level, we changed the current token’s kind to an EOF token. A lot of places in the parser are not set up to expect this token change. The intended workaround was to check whether pushing a structure marker failed (which would change the token kind) and bail out parsing if this happened. This was fragile and caused assertion failures in assert builds.
Instead of changing the current token’s kind, and failing to push the structure marker, let the lexer know that it should cut off lexing, essentially making the input buffer stop at the current position. The parser will continue to consume its current token (`Parser.Tok`) and the next token that’s already lexed in the lexer (`Lexer.NextToken`) before reaching the emulated EOF token. Thus two more tokens are parsed than before, but that shouldn’t make much of a difference.
Split up the expr list parsing members such that
there are separate entry points for tuple and
argument list parsing, and start using the argument
list parsing member for call and subscripts.
At the moment, if there is an error in the `switch` statement expression or if the `{` is missing, we return `nullptr` from `parseStmtSwitch`, but we consume tokens while trying to parse the `switch` statement. This causes the AST to not contain any nodes for the tokens that were consumed while trying to parse the `switch` statement.
While this doesn’t cause any issues during compilation (compiling fails anyway so not having the `switch` statement in the AST is not a problem) this causes issues when trying to complete inside an expression that was consumed while trying to parse the `switch` statement but doesn’t have a representation in the AST. The solver-based completion approach can’t find the expression that contains the completion token (because it’s not part of the AST) and thus return empty results.
To fix this, make sure we are always creating a `SwitchStmt` when consuming tokens for it.
Previously, one could always assume that a `SwitchStmt` had a valid `LBraceLoc` and `RBraceLoc`. This is no longer the case because of the recovery. In order to form the `SwitchStmt`’s `SourceRange`, I needed to add a `EndLoc` property to `SwitchStmt` that keeps track of the last token in the `SwitchStmt`. Theoretically we should be able to compute this location by traversing the right brace, case stmts, subject expression, … in reverse order until we find something that’s not missing. But if the `SubjectExpr` is an `ErrorExpr`, representing a missing expression, it might have a source range that points to one after the last token in the statement (this is due to the way the `ErrorExpr` is being constructed), therefore returning an invalid range. So overall I thought it was easier and safer to add another property.
Fixes rdar://76688441 [SR-14490]
Always parse `async` and `await`, allowing the definition and use of
asynchronous functions without the "experimental concurrency" flag.
Note that, at present, use of asynchronous functions requires one to
explicitly import or link against the `_Concurrency` library. We'll
sort this out in a follow-up change.
Tracked by rdar://73455330.
* Initial draft of async sequences
* Adjust AsyncSequence associated type requirements
* Add a draft implementation of AsyncSequence and associated functionality
* Correct merge damage and rename from GeneratorProtocol to AsyncIteratorProtocol
* Add AsyncSequence types to the cmake lists
* Add cancellation support
* [DRAFT] Implementation of protocol conformance rethrowing
* Account for ASTVerifier passes to ensure throwing and by conformance rethrowing verifies appropriately
* Remove commented out code
* OtherConstructorDeclRefExpr can also be a source of a rethrowing kind function
* Re-order the checkApply logic to account for existing throwing calculations better
* Extract rethrowing calculation into smaller functions
* Allow for closures and protocol conformances to contribute to throwing
* Add unit tests for conformance based rethrowing
* Restrict rethrowing requirements to only protocols marked with @rethrows
* Correct logic for gating of `@rethrows` and adjust the determinates to be based upon throws and not rethrows spelling
* Attempt to unify the async sequence features together
* Reorder try await to latest syntax
* revert back to the inout diagnosis
* House mutations in local scope
* Revert "House mutations in local scope"
This reverts commit d91f1b25b59fff8e4be107c808895ff3f293b394.
* Adjust for inout diagnostics and fall back to original mutation strategy
* Convert async flag to source locations and add initial try support to for await in syntax
* Fix case typo of MinMax.swift
* Adjust rethrowing tests to account for changes associated with @rethrows
* Allow parsing and diagnostics associated with try applied to for await in syntax
* Correct the code-completion for @rethrows
* Additional corrections for the code-completion for @rethrows this time for the last in the list
* Handle throwing cases of iteration of async sequences
* restore building XCTest
* First wave of feedback fixes
* Rework constraints checking for async sequence for-try-await-in checking
* Allow testing of for-await-in parsing and silgen testing and add unit tests for both
* Remove async sequence operators for now
* Back out cancellation of AsyncIteratorProtocols
* Restructure protocol conformance throws checking and cache results
* remove some stray whitespaces
* Correct some merge damage
* Ensure the throwing determinate for applying for-await-in always has a valid value and adjust the for-await-in silgen test to reflect the cancel changes
* Squelch the python linter for line length
