This isn't as straightforward as it should be, since EnumElementDecls aren't AbstractFunctionDecls, but luckily there's only one trivial curry level with a thin metatype parameter.
Swift SVN r28991
Modules occupy a weird space in the AST now: they can be treated like
types (Swift.Int), which is captured by ModuleType. They can be
treated like values for disambiguation (Swift.print), which is
captured by ModuleExpr. And we jump through hoops in various places to
store "either a module or a decl".
Start cleaning this up by transforming Module into ModuleDecl, a
TypeDecl that's implicitly created to describe a module. Subsequent
changes will start folding away the special cases (ModuleExpr ->
DeclRefExpr, name lookup results stop having a separate Module case,
etc.).
Note that the Module -> ModuleDecl typedef is there to limit the
changes needed. Much of this patch is actually dealing with the fact
that Module used to have Ctx and Name public members that now need to
be accessed via getASTContext() and getName(), respectively.
Swift SVN r28284
Instead of immediately creating closures for local function declarations and treating them directly as capturable values, break function captures down and transitively capture the storage necessary to invoke the captured functions. Change the way SILGen emits calls to closures and local functions so that it treats the capture list as the first curry level of an invocation, so that full applications of closure literals or nested functions don't require a partial apply at all. This allows references among local functions with captures to work within the existing confines of partial_apply, and also has the nice benefit that circular references would work without creating reference cycles (though Sema unfortunately rejects them; something we arguably ought to fix.)
This fixes rdar://problem/11266246 and improves codegen of local functions. Full applications of functions, or immediate applications of closure literals like { }(), now never need to allocate a closure.
Swift SVN r28112
Keep track of a second set of "direct method reference" curry thunks that don't end in a dynamic dispatch in order to properly implement a partial application such as 'let foo = super.foo'. Fixes rdar://problem/20598526.
Swift SVN r27538
These aren't really orthogonal concerns--you'll never have a @thick @cc(objc_method), or an @objc_block @cc(witness_method)--and we have gross decision trees all over the codebase that try to hopscotch between the subset of combinations that make sense. Stop the madness by eliminating AbstractCC and folding its states into SILFunctionTypeRepresentation. This cleans up a ton of code across the compiler.
I couldn't quite eliminate AbstractCC's information from AST function types, since SIL type lowering transiently created AnyFunctionTypes with AbstractCCs set, even though these never occur at the source level. To accommodate type lowering, allow AnyFunctionType::ExtInfo to carry a SILFunctionTypeRepresentation, and arrange for the overlapping representations to share raw values.
In order to avoid disturbing test output, AST and SILFunctionTypes are still printed and parsed using the existing @thin/@thick/@objc_block and @cc() attributes, which is kind of gross, but lets me stage in the real source-breaking change separately.
Swift SVN r27095
The set of attributes that make sense at the AST level is increasingly divergent from those at the SIL level, so it doesn't really make sense for these to be the same. It'll also help prevent us from accidental unwanted propagation of attributes from the AST to SIL, which has caused bugs in the past. For staging purposes, start off with SILFunctionType's versions exactly the same as the FunctionType versions, which necessitates some ugly glue code but minimizes the potential disruption.
Swift SVN r27022
