It uses a worklist-based algorithm. In contrast to a recursive traversal algorithm,
it cannot cause a stack overflow for very deep dominator trees.
Swift SVN r24107
This is part of rdar://16323038. Because this hasn't been fully design reviewed and
implemented, I'm naming it as __nocapture for now. It is blocking finishing off the
"improved let model" work.
Swift SVN r24079
This flag enables one to specify a json file that expresses a specific
pipeline in the following format:
[
[
"$PASS_MANAGER_ID",
"run_n_times"|"run_to_fixed_point",
$NUM_ITERATIONS,
"$PASS1", "$PASS2", ...
],
...
]
This will make it easier to experiment with different pass pipelines by
allowing:
1. Automatic generation of pass pipelines without needing to recompile
the compiler itself.
2. Simple scripting of pass pipelines via the json meta language.
3. Enabling the easy expression and reproducability of a specific
pipeline ordering via radar.
In the next commit I will provide a python library for the generation of these
json files with a few types of pipeline generators already created.
Swift SVN r24055
everything the type attribute does (notably, doesn't work on parameters),
but this includes the infrastructure to apply it in all the sordid places
that need to be touched for type-adjusting declattributes on variables.
Swift SVN r24044
...and then honor them.
While here, make -l a little more flexible (see interpret_with_options test).
rdar://problem/17830826, which unblocks the LLDB feature for the same.
Swift SVN r24033
r23968 wrote out a record of which source files were included in a build,
and whether they were succesfully compiled or not...and if not, whether
they were out of date because of a cascading or non-cascading dependency.
This commit uses that information to decide what files might need to be
rebuilt even if a particular input doesn't change and doesn't appear to
have any changed dependencies. The two interesting cases are:
- A file was going to be built last time, but the build was halted
because of an error. Build it this time.
- One of the files was removed and thus we've lost a source of dependency
information; rebuild everything!
rdar://problem/19270980
Swift SVN r24018
I refactored, generalized, and cleaned up an existing helper.
I also removed hard-coded assumptions about successor indices.
There's no point giving CondBranch a true/false API if we don't respect it.
Swift SVN r24001
Previously, this storage required that alignof(void *) >= alignof(Decl). This is
true on 64-bit platforms, where these are both 8, but on 32-bit platforms
alignof(void *) is only 4.
This now allocates enough bytes to match the alignment of the Decl in question.
This does mean that a void * must fit in that alignment, but this is true on 32-
and 64-bit platforms, and a static_assert ensures that this is true at compile
time.
As part of this change, the logic for allocating memory for a Decl has been
refactored into a separate function, so that the logic for allocating space for
a ClangNode can be centralized.
Swift SVN r23990
"private" is a very overloaded term already. "Cascading" instead of
"non-private" is a bit more clear about what will happen with this sort
of lookup.
No functionality change. There are some double negatives I plan to clean
up in the next commit, but this one was supposed to be very mechanical.
Swift SVN r23969
This is important because we might get part-way through the full
compilation, overwriting swiftdeps files as we go, and then encounter an
error. We don't want to lose information about any decls that have been
removed since the previous compile, so we propagate forward the information
we already have by saving it to a "build record" file.
More simply, this is necessary to track when a file is removed from a target.
The next commit will handle reading in this file at the start of a build.
Swift SVN r23968
I am starting to reuse manglings for different passes. I want to make sure that
when we reuse functions we actually get a function created by the same pass.
Swift SVN r23924
... now that we have an exquisitely shaved yak.
This provides a simple and uniform model for "let" constants: they are always either
immediately initialized in their declaration, or they are initialized dynamically
exactly once before any use.
This is a simple generalization of our current model for initializers, but enables
the use of let constants in more cases in local context, e.g. patterns like this:
let x : SomeThing
if condition {
x = foo()
} else {
x = bar()
}
use(x)
Previously this would have to be declared a "var" for no good reason: the value is
only ever initialized, never actually mutated.
The implementation of this is reasonably straight-forward now that the infrastructure
is in place: Sema treats 'let' constants as "settable" if they lack an initializer
(either in the declaration or in a non-PBD binding). This exposes them as an lvalue
at the AST level. SILGen then lowers these things to an alloc_stack, and DI enforces
the "initialization only" requirement that it already enforces for uninitialized 'let'
properties in structs/classes.
Swift SVN r23916
initializer but has no "parent" PatternBindingDecl or Pattern (i.e.
paramdecls). This is currently set on decls in the pattern of
foreach loops and case patterns, but I'll add it to other places I
find as well.
NFC since this bit is only set and not read, just more yak shaving.
Swift SVN r23910
storage for arbitrary values.
A buffer doesn't provide any way to identify the type of
value it stores, and so it cannot be copied, moved, or
destroyed independently; thus it's not available as a
first-class type in Swift, which is why I've labelled
it Unsafe. But it does allow an efficient means of
opaquely preserving information between two cooperating
functions. This will be useful for the adjustments I
need to make to materializeForSet to support safe
addressors.
I considered making this a SIL type category instead,
like $@value_buffer T. This is an attractive idea because
it's generally better-typed. The disadvantages are that:
- it would need its own address_to_pointer equivalents and
- alloc_stack doesn't know what type will be stored in
any particular buffer, so there still needs to be
something opaque.
This representation is a bit gross, but it'll do.
Swift SVN r23903
The underlying problem is that e.g. even if a method is private but its class is public, the method can be referenced from another module - from the vtable of a derived class.
So far we handled this by setting the SILLinkage of such methods according to the visibility of the class. But this prevented dead method elimination.
Now I set the SILLinkage according to the visibility of the method. This enables dead method elimination, but it requires the following:
1) Still set the linkage in llvm so that it can be referenced from outside.
2) If the method is dead and eliminated, create a stub for it (which calls swift_reportMissingMethod).
Swift SVN r23889
Now all SIL function specialization passes use the new mangling infrastructure.
Lets keep it that way for future passes as well. = ).
Implements:
<rdar://problem/18831609>
Fixes:
<rdar://problem/19065735>
<rdar://problem/18906781>
<rdar://problem/18956916>
Swift SVN r23859
