isn't used yet, but will be for modeling the self argument passed to an
address-only witness implementation. NFC since all this code is dead :-)
Swift SVN r23857
Specifically, we care about the case where a job is run because of a private
dependency, and then a non-private dependency turns out to be dirty. In
this case, we still need to make sure to build all downstream files.
With this the driver support for private dependencies should be complete
and correct.
Swift SVN r23853
- Add flags to dependency entries in DependencyGraph.
- Don't traverse past private dependencies in markTransitive.
- Only mark dependent jobs after a build if the build was triggered
(a) explicitly (because the file is out of date), or
(b) because of a non-private dependency.
This still isn't fully correct because of new non-private dependencies
discovered /after/ building an individual file, but it's on the way there.
Solving that problem will require tracking which dependencies have already
been marked dirty (next commit).
Swift SVN r23852
- Give loadWithPath an enum result that includes "NeedsRebuilding".
This will be returned when a new dependency is discovered that
retroactively affects the graph.
- Don't clear the "provides" set for a node when it gets reloaded;
just append to it. This lets us avoid calling markTransitive twice.
- Use proper types for "depends" and "provides" entries instead of std::pair.
- Use swift::OptionSet instead of a manual bitmask.
- Use separate "depends" and "provides" callbacks when parsing dependency
files.
No expected functionality change.
Swift SVN r23851
Using the intrinsics is obnoxious because I needed them
to return Builtin.NativeObject?, but there's no reasonable
way to safely generate optional types from Builtins.cpp.
Ugh.
Dave and I also decided that there's no need for
swift_tryPin to allow a null object.
Swift SVN r23824
This is apart of creating the infrastructure for creating special manglings for
all of the passes that we specialize. The main motiviations for this
infrastructure is:
1. Create an easy method with examples on how to create these manglings.
2. Support multiple specializations. This is important once we allow for partial
specialization and can already occur if we perform function signature
optimizations on specialized functions.
The overall scheme is as follows:
_TTS<MANGLINGINFO>__<FUNCNAME>
Thus if we specialize twice, the first specialization will just be treated as
the function name for the second specialization.
<MANGLINGINFO> is defined as:
_<SPECIALIZATIONKINDID>_<SPECIALIZATIONUNIQUEINFO>
Where specialization kind is an enum that specifies the specific sort of
specialization we are performing and specialization unique info is enough
information to ensure that the identity of the function is appropriately
preserved.
Swift SVN r23801
Use the CodeGenOptions the Clang frontend determined for the compiler instance instead of starting from scratch, so that we pick up important settings like '-mstackrealign'. Fixes the GLKit test on iOS. rdar://problem/19180367
Swift SVN r23792
This is a hidden frontend-only option intended for debugging purposes,
mainly for identifying where in a file the type checker is spending most
of its time. Use with "sort -g" to get the top problem functions.
Swift SVN r23789
These changes make the following improvements to how we generate diagnostics for expression typecheck failure:
- Customizing a diagnostic for a specific expression kind is as easy as adding a new method to the FailureDiagnosis class,
and does not require intimate knowledge of the constraint solver’s inner workings.
- As part of this patch, I’ve introduced specialized diagnostics for call, binop, unop, subscript, assignment and inout
expressions, but we can go pretty far with this.
- This also opens up the possibility to customize diagnostics not just for the expression kind, but for the specific types
involved as well.
- For the purpose of presenting accurate type info, partially-specialized subexpressions are individually re-typechecked
free of any contextual types. This allows us to:
- Properly surface subexpression errors.
- Almost completely avoid any type variables in our diagnostics. In cases where they could not be eliminated, we now
substitute in "_".
- More accurately indicate the sources of errors.
- We do a much better job of diagnosing disjunction failures. (So no more nonsensical ‘UInt8’ error messages.)
- We now present reasonable error messages for overload resolution failures, informing the user of partially-matching
parameter lists when possible.
At the very least, these changes address the following bugs:
<rdar://problem/15863738> More information needed in type-checking error messages
<rdar://problem/16306600> QoI: passing a 'let' value as an inout results in an unfriendly diagnostic
<rdar://problem/16449805> Wrong error for struct-to-protocol downcast
<rdar://problem/16699932> improve type checker diagnostic when passing Double to function taking a Float
<rdar://problem/16707914> fatal error: Can't unwrap Optional.None…Optional.swift, line 75 running Master-Detail Swift app built from template
<rdar://problem/16785829> Inout parameter fixit
<rdar://problem/16900438> We shouldn't leak the internal type placeholder
<rdar://problem/16909379> confusing type check diagnostics
<rdar://problem/16951521> Extra arguments to functions result in an unhelpful error
<rdar://problem/16971025> Two Terrible Diagnostics
<rdar://problem/17007804> $T2 in compiler error string
<rdar://problem/17027483> Terrible diagnostic
<rdar://problem/17083239> Mysterious error using find() with Foundation types
<rdar://problem/17149771> Diagnostic for closure with no inferred return value leaks type variables
<rdar://problem/17212371> Swift poorly-worded error message when overload resolution fails on return type
<rdar://problem/17236976> QoI: Swift error for incorrectly typed parameter is confusing/misleading
<rdar://problem/17304200> Wrong error for non-self-conforming protocols
<rdar://problem/17321369> better error message for inout protocols
<rdar://problem/17539380> Swift error seems wrong
<rdar://problem/17559593> Bogus locationless "treating a forced downcast to 'NSData' as optional will never produce 'nil'" warning
<rdar://problem/17567973> 32-bit error message is really far from the mark: error: missing argument for parameter 'withFont' in call
<rdar://problem/17671058> Wrong error message: "Missing argument for parameter 'completion' in call"
<rdar://problem/17704609> Float is not convertible to UInt8
<rdar://problem/17705424> Poor error reporting for passing Doubles to NSColor: extra argument 'red' in call
<rdar://problem/17743603> Swift compiler gives misleading error message in "NSLayoutConstraint.constraintsWithVisualFormat("x", options: 123, metrics: nil, views: views)"
<rdar://problem/17784167> application of operator to generic type results in odd diagnostic
<rdar://problem/17801696> Awful diagnostic trying to construct an Int when .Int is around
<rdar://problem/17863882> cannot convert the expression's type '()' to type 'Seq'
<rdar://problem/17865869> "has different argument names" diagnostic when parameter defaulted-ness differs
<rdar://problem/17937593> Unclear error message for empty array literal without type context
<rdar://problem/17943023> QoI: compiler displays wrong error when a float is provided to a Int16 parameter in init method
<rdar://problem/17951148> Improve error messages for expressions inside if statements by pre-evaluating outside the 'if'
<rdar://problem/18057815> Unhelpful Swift error message
<rdar://problem/18077468> Incorrect argument label for insertSubview(...)
<rdar://problem/18079213> 'T1' is not identical to 'T2' lacks directionality
<rdar://problem/18086470> Confusing Swift error message: error: 'T' is not convertible to 'MirrorDisposition'
<rdar://problem/18098995> QoI: Unhelpful compiler error when leaving off an & on an inout parameter
<rdar://problem/18104379> Terrible error message
<rdar://problem/18121897> unexpected low-level error on assignment to immutable value through array writeback
<rdar://problem/18123596> unexpected error on self. capture inside class method
<rdar://problem/18152074> QoI: Improve diagnostic for type mismatch in dictionary subscripting
<rdar://problem/18242160> There could be a better error message when using [] instead of [:]
<rdar://problem/18242812> 6A1021a : Type variable leaked
<rdar://problem/18331819> Unclear error message when trying to set an element of an array constant (Swift)
<rdar://problem/18414834> Bad diagnostics example
<rdar://problem/18422468> Calculation of constant value yields unexplainable error
<rdar://problem/18427217> Misleading error message makes debugging difficult
<rdar://problem/18439742> Misleading error: "cannot invoke" mentions completely unrelated types as arguments
<rdar://problem/18535804> Wrong compiler error from swift compiler
<rdar://problem/18567914> Xcode 6.1. GM, Swift, assignment from Int64 to NSNumber. Warning shown as problem with UInt8
<rdar://problem/18784027> Negating Int? Yields Float
<rdar://problem/17691565> attempt to modify a 'let' variable with ++ results in typecheck error about @lvalue Float
<rdar://problem/17164001> "++" on let value could give a better error message
Swift SVN r23782
- We switch to a model where let properties may be "initialized", but never
reassigned. Specifically, immutable properties in structs/classes may have
an init value specified in their declaration (but can then never be reset
in any init implementation) or not (in which case they must be initialized
exactly once on all paths through every init. This makes a lot more sense
for immutability, defines several problems away, and provides a path to
supporting things like (rdar://16181314)
- We now *never* default initialize an immutable property. Formerly
we would default initialize optional let properties to nil, but this
isn't actually useful, and allows an error of omission with let
properties.
This resolves: <rdar://problem/19035287> let properties should only be initializable, not reassignable
and possibly other radars.
Swift SVN r23779
They're invalid, and we don't want to blow the stack trying to decompose a type with infinite elements. Fixes rdar://problem/17920535.
Swift SVN r23775
Pinning an object prevents it from being deallocated,
just like retaining it, but only one client can own the
pin at once. Sensible "sharing" of the pin can occur
if attempts are perfectly nested. It is efficient to
simultaneously query the pin state of an object in
conjunction with its strong reference count.
This combination of traits makes pinning suitable for
use in tracking whether a data structure backed by
an object is undergoing a non-structural modification:
- A structural change would require unique ownership
of the object, but two non-structural changes (to
different parts of the object) can occur at once
without harm. So a non-structural change can check
for either uniqueness or a pin and then, if necessary,
assert the pin for the duration of the change.
Meanwhile, this act of asserting the pin prevents
simultaneous structural changes.
- A very simple code-generation discipline leads to
changes being perfectly nested as long as they're
all performed by a single thread (or synchronously).
Asynchrony can introduce imperfect nesting, but it's
easy to write that off as a race condition and hence
undefined behavior.
See Accessors.rst for more on both of these points.
Swift SVN r23761
a capture list hung off the CaptureExpr it was associated with. This made
sense lexically (since a capture list is nested inside of the closure) but
not semantically. Semantically, the capture list initializers are evaluated
outside the closure, the variables are bound to those values, then the closure
captures the newly bound values.
To directly represent this, represent captures with a new CaptureListExpr node,
which contains the ClosureExpr inside of it. This correctly models the semantic
relationship, and makes sure that AST walkers all process the initializers of the
capture list as being *outside* of the closure.
This fixes rdar://19146761 and probably others.
Swift SVN r23756
Add the following functionality to the Swift compiler:
* covariant subtyping of Set
* upcasting, downcasting of Set
* automatic bridging between Set and NSSet, including
* NSSet params/return values in ObjC are imported as Set<NSObject>
* Set params/return values in Swift are visible to ObjC as NSSet
<rdar://problem/18853078> Implement Set<T> up and downcasting
Swift SVN r23751
This reverts commit dc98e17d84b991b6be8b8feb5e0d05aad24f52a4.
I believe this commit was causing test failures on:
IRGen/c_layout.sil
IRGen/existentials.sil
It also recreates the file lib/Serialization/ModuleFormat.h,
which really can't have been intended.
Swift SVN r23732
It had exposed a problem with the MemBehavior on a couple SIL
instructions which resulted in code motion moving a retain across an
instruction that can release (fixed in r23722).
From the original commit message:
Remove restriction on substituting existentials during mandatory inlining.
Issues around this have now been resolved, so we should now support
anything that Sema lets through.
Fixes rdar://problem/17769717.
Swift SVN r23729
Adding explicit constructors to Clang-imported structs in the previous commits exposes a latent phase ordering issue between the Clang importer and SIL deserialization. Deserializing the standard library SIL ends up pulling in additional Clang decls which never get type-checked before we attempt to emit their code. Work around this by bringing back the "EagerDeserializedDecls" block in the serialization format, and adding any cross-referenced decls that get referenced in SILSerializeAll mode to it, so that we ensure they're available before SILGen. We also have to type-check external decls after doing so, since when only importing a module, we wouldn't do any type-checking at all otherwise.
Swift SVN r23728
If an imported C struct has no __nonnull pointer fields, then we can give a default initializer that zeroes all of its fields. This becomes a requirement when working with partially-imported types like NSDecimal. NSDecimal has bitfields Swift can't see yet, so it's impossible to DI, but the Foundation functions that work with NSDecimal all emit their result by out parameter, and without access to its fields it is impossible to initialize an NSDecimal for use with one of these functions. Implement the initializer using a builtin that gets lowered by IRGen; this is also made necessary by the fact that Swift has only a partial view of the struct, so we can't form a complete zero initializer until we have the definitive type layout from Clang.
Swift SVN r23727
Having the wrong memory behavior here can cause SIL Code Motion to move
retains and releases across these instructions, which is invalid.
This resulted in a retain-after-free issue in the DollarChain benchmark
after I committed r23673 (which was soon after backed out in r23679).
Swift SVN r23722
We specifically only handle cases of functions that are not visible externally
and for whom all function_refs to the function only have apply inst users.
<rdar://problem/19137435>
Swift SVN r23714
SILMetadata is the base class with a single enum member (MDKind).
SILBranchNode is the derived class with additional members:
unsigned NumOperands
an array of uint32_t
A static member function SILBranchNode::get is implemented to get or create
SILBranchNode. All SILMetadata created are uniqued and saved in SILModule's
member variable:
llvm::FoldingSet<SILMetadata> Metadatas
Usage of SILMetadta by SILInstruction is captured in SILModule's member variable:
llvm::DenseMap<const SILInstruction *, SILMetadata *> MetadataStore
This is similar to LLVM's Metadata. Another option is to add a SILMetadata* to
SILInstruction. The disadvantage is the waste of space when we don't have PGO on.
This commit also enables parsing and printing of SILMetadata.
We add keyword sil_metadata to define SILMetadata:
sil_metadata !0 = {"branch_weights", 3, 5}
For parsing, we add a map in SILModule
llvm::DenseMap<unsigned, SILMetadata *> NumberedMetadata
that maps from ID to SILMetadata* to help matching usage of "!id" in SILFunction
with definition of "!id" in sil_metadata section.
For printing, we assign IDs to SILMetadata at SILModule scope, we then pass in
an optional argument of
llvm::DenseMap<const SILMetadata *, unsigned> *MetadataMap
to SILFunction::print in order to get the ID of SILMetadata used in
SILInstruction.
Post-commit review will be appreciated.
rdar://18269754
Swift SVN r23713
or pointer depends on another for validity in a
non-obvious way.
Also, document some basic value-propagation rules
based roughly on the optimization rules for ARC.
Swift SVN r23695
We know that a native swift array that does not need an element type check is
not going to change to an nsarray, or to an array that needs an element type
check. This allows us to specialize array code.
The array semantic calls 'array.props.isCocoa/needsElementTypeCheck' returns
said array properties for a read.
func f(a : A[AClass]) {
for i in 0..a.count {
let b = a.props.isCocoa()
.. += _getElement(a, i, b)
}
}
==>
func f(a : A[AClass]) {
let b2 = a.props.isCocoa()
if (!b2) {
for i in 0..a.count {
.. += _getElement(a, i, false)
}
} else {
for i in 0..a.count {
let b = a.props.isCocoa
.. += _getElement(a, i, b)
}
}
}
The stdlib will be changed to use array.props calls in a future commit.
rdar://17955309
Swift SVN r23689
"array.props.isCocoa/needsElementTypeCheck" semantic calls will mark calls that
return array properties: isCocoa and needsElementTypeCheck. We know that said
states can only transfer in certain directions (a native swift array that does
not need an element type check stays in this state) enabling us to version loops
based on the state of said array array properties.
rdar://17955309
Swift SVN r23688
--This line, and those bel that ow, will be ignored--
M test/Parse/optional.swift
M test/ClangModules/Security_test.swift
M test/expr/expressions.swift
M include/swift/AST/DiagnosticsSema.def
M lib/Sema/CSApply.cpp
Swift SVN r23685
...and thus does not affect downstream files...
...and adopt it in several places:
- when looking up the default type for a literal (test included)
- when looking up the first component in an IdentTypeRepr (test included)
- when deciding which ~= to use in a switch (test forthcoming)
- when a protocol has an operator function requirement (test forthcoming)
- when validating @NSApplicationMain and @UIApplicationMain
- when an enum element shows up unqualified in a switch
- several places where it doesn't matter because we're looking something up
in the standard library.
Part of rdar://problem/15353101
Swift SVN r23670
This does not have any tests since I am going to start going through SILGen
tests and updating them for guaranteed self as the appropriate tests.
*NOTE* There is more work to be done in terms of thunks, but the basic
functionality is done.
rdar://15729033
Swift SVN r23653
This should have been done a long time ago since SILOptions are options that
should be able to effect everything SIL related. In this case I just want to
pass in a flag on the SILModule to enable +0 self. By putting it on the
SILModule I can conveniently check it in SILFunctionType without exposing any
internal state from SILFunctionType.cpp.
Swift SVN r23647
