rdar://12315571
Allow a function to be defined with this syntax:
func doThing(a:Thing) withItem(b:Item) -> Result { ... }
This allows the keyword names in the function type (in this case
`(_:Thing, withItem:Item) -> Result`) to differ from the names bound in the
function body (in this case `(a:Thing, b:Item) -> Result`, which allows
for Cocoa-style `verbingNoun` keyword idioms to be used without requiring
those keywords to also be used as awkward variable names. In addition
to modifying the parser, this patch extends the FuncExpr type by replacing
the former `getParamPatterns` accessor with separate `getArgParamPatterns`
and `getBodyParamPatterns`, which retrieve the argument name patterns and
body parameter binding patterns respectively.
Swift SVN r3098
destructor finds a metatype member (e.g., a typealias), the resulting
access expression should be based on the metatype (possibly
specialized) rather than based on 'this'. Fixes <rdar://problem/11926972>.
Swift SVN r2390
archetype conforms from a list of Types (each of which is existential)
to the minimized, sorted list of protocol declarations as used by
canonical protocol composition types. This stable list is more
suitable for IR generation.
Swift SVN r2238
results of member lookup, and eliminate all uses of
MemberLookup::createResultAST(). The AST library should not be
performing this semantic analysis.
Swift SVN r2221
functions. This involves a few steps:
- When assigning archetypes to type parameters, also walk all of the
protocols to which the type parameter conforms and assign archetypes
to each of the associated types.
- When performing name lookup into an archetype, look into all of
the protocols to which it conforms. If we find something, it can be
referenced via the new ArchetypeMemberRefExpr.
- When type-checking ArchetypeMemberRefExpr, substitute the values
of the various associated types into the type of the member, so the
resulting expression involves the archetypes for the enclosing
generic method.
The rest of the type checking essentially follows from the fact that
archetypes are unique types which (therefore) have no behavior beyond
what is provided via the protocols they conform to. However, there is
still much work to do to ensure that we get the archetypes set up
correctly.
Swift SVN r2201
We probably need to add some sort of data structure to represent this information, but as a proof of concept the current code appears to work. I'm still working out how to make sure the parser doesn't prematurely bind names and how to make name-binding use it where appropriate (and avoid it when we don't need it, because no matter how efficient we make it, it will still be relatively expensive).
Swift SVN r2112
