Otherwise, we'll fail to capture "locals" declared in top-level guard
statements. This led to an assertion failure in SILGen.
Depends on previous commit.
rdar://problem/21997265
Swift SVN r30812
https://twitter.com/practicalswift/status/625429628107255808?refsrc=email&s=11
all compile without crashing, other than "()=()", which is tracked by:
<rdar://problem/21886435> Swift compiler crashes on "()=()"
This one crashes because "()" isn't being type checked as an lvalue. If someone
feels inspired to fix this, it is our shortest known compiler crash.
Swift SVN r30735
"unavoidable failure" path, along with Failure::DoesNotHaveNonMutatingMember and
just doing some basic disambiguation in CSDiags.
This provides some benefits:
- Allows us to plug in much more specific diagnostics for the existing "only has
mutating members" diagnostic, including producing notes for why the base expr
isn't mutable (see e.g. test/Sema/immutability.swift diffs).
- Corrects issues where we'd drop full decl name info for selector references.
- Wordsmiths diagnostics to not complain about "values of type Foo.Type" instead
complaining about "type Foo"
- Where before we would diagnose all failures with "has no member named", we now
distinguish between when there is no member, and when you can't use it. When you
can't use it, you get a vauge "cannot use it" diagnostic, but...
- This provides an infrastructure for diagnosing other kinds of problems (e.g.
trying to use a private member or a static member from an instance).
- Improves a number of cases where failed type member constraints would produce uglier
diagnostics than a different constraint failure would.
- Resolves a number of rdars, e.g. (and probably others):
<rdar://problem/20294245> QoI: Error message mentions value rather than key for subscript
Swift SVN r30715
get the same wording, fixing <rdar://problem/21964599> Different diagnostics for the same issue
While I'm in the area, remove some dead code.
Swift SVN r30713
which we have a contextual type that was the failure reason. These are a bit
longer but also more explicit than the previous diagnostics.
Swift SVN r30669
version of the new CTP_ReturnStmt conversion, used to generate return-specific
diagnostics. Now that we have a general solution, we can just use that.
This improves diagnostics in returns for accessors, since they were apparently
not getting the bit set.
Swift SVN r30665
- Improve handling of if_expr in a couple of ways: teach constraint simplification
about IfThen/IfElse and teach CSDiags about the case when the cond expr doesn't match
BooleanType. This is rarely necessary, but CSDiags is all about cornercases, and this
does fix a problem in a testcase.
- Be a bit more specific about the constraint failure kind (e.g. say subtype) and when
we have a protocol conformance failure, emit a specific diagnostic about it, instead of
just saying that the types aren't convertible.
Swift SVN r30650
conversion failures, making a bunch of diagnostics more specific and useful.
UnavoidableFailures can be very helpful, but they can also be the first constraint
failure that the system happened to come across... which is not always the most
meaningful one. CSDiag's expr processing machinery has a generally better way of
narrowing down which ones make the most sense.
Swift SVN r30647
- Don't "aka" a Builtin.Int2123 type, it just makes a bad diagnostic worse.
- Split out the predicate that CSDiag uses to determine what a conversion
constraint is to a helper fn, and add subtype constraints to the mix.
- Move eraseTypeData into CSDiag (its own client) as a static function.
- Make eraseTypeData be a bit more careful about literals, in an attempt to
improve diagnostics when literals get re-type-checked. It turns out that
this still isn't enough as shown by the regression on the
decl/func/default-values.swift testcase, and the
Constraints/dictionary_literal.swift testcase where one bad diagnostic turns
into another different one, but I'll keep working on it.
- Beef up diagnoseContextualConversionError and the caller to it to be more
self contained and principled about the conversion constraints it digs out
of the system. This improves the diagnostics on a couple of cases.
Swift SVN r30642
directly into the diagnostics subsystem. This ensures a more consistent
treatment of type printing (e.g. catches a case where a diagnostic didn't
single quote the type) and gives these diagnostics access to "aka".
Swift SVN r30609
- Have DiagnosticEngine produce "aka" annotations for sugared types.
- Fix the "optional type '@lvalue C?' cannot be used as a boolean; test for '!= nil' instead"
diagnostic to stop printing @lvalue noise.
This addresses:
<rdar://problem/19036351> QoI: Print minimally-desugared 'aka' types like Clang does
Swift SVN r30587
type check the subexpressions of a callexpr more consistently,
always checking the arguments independently (not just if one argument
is inout). This routes around issues handling tuples, and brings more
consistency to the experience. Factor this logic out and use it for
operators and subscripts as well.
Swift SVN r30583
independently (not just if one argument is inout). This routes around issues handling tuples,
and brings more consistency to the experience. Factor this logic out and use it for operators
and subscripts as well.
This improves a small collection of diagnostics, including the infamous:
// Infer incompatible type.
- func6(fn: {a,b->Float in 4.0 }) // expected-error {{cannot convert return expression of type 'Double' to expected return type 'Float'}}
+ func6(fn: {a,b->Float in 4.0 }) // expected-error {{cannot invoke 'func6' with an argument list of type '(fn: (_, _) -> Float)'}}
+ // expected-note @-1 {{expected an argument list of type '(fn: (Int, Int) -> Int)'}}
Swift SVN r30570
diagnose problems inside of them instead of punting on them completely.
This leads to substantially better error messages in many cases, fixing:
<rdar://problem/19870975> Incorrect diagnostic for failed member lookups within closures passed as arguments ("(_) -> _")
<rdar://problem/21883806> Bogus "'_' can only appear in a pattern or on the left side of an assignment" is back
<rdar://problem/20712541> QoI: Int/UInt mismatch produces useless error inside a block
and possibly others. We are not yet capitalizing on available type information we do
have about closure exprs, so there are some cases where we produce
"error: type of expression is ambiguous without more context"
when this isn't strictly true, but this is still a huge step forward.
Swift SVN r30547
with no returns *must* be (), add a defaulting constraint
so that it will be inferred as () in the absence of
other possibilities.
The chief benefit here is that it allows better QoI when
the user simply hasn't yet written the return statement.
Doing this does regress a corner case where an attempt
to recover from an uncalled function leads to the
type-checker inferring a result for a closure that
doesn't make any sense at all.
Swift SVN r30476
fixing:
<rdar://problem/20789423> Unclear diagnostic for multi-statement closure with no return type
<rdar://problem/21829141> BOGUS: unexpected trailing closure
<rdar://problem/21784170> Incongruous `unexpected trailing closure` error in `init` function which is cast and called without trailing closure.
Swift SVN r30443
we can start taking advantage of ambiguously typed subexpressions in CSDiags. We
start by validating the callee function of ApplyExprs, which substantially improves
our abilities to generate precise diagnostics about malformed calls.
This is the minimal introduction of this concept to CSDiags, a lot of refactoring
is yet to come, however, this is enough to resolve:
<rdar://problem/21080030> Bad diagnostic for invalid method call in boolean expression
<rdar://problem/21784170> Incongruous `unexpected trailing closure` error in `init` function which is cast and called without trailing closure.
one of the testcases from:
<rdar://problem/20789423> Unclear diagnostic for multi-statement closure with no return type
and a bunch of other places where we got weird "unexpected trailing closure"
diagnostics that made no sense. As usual, it is two steps forward and one step back,
as this exposed some other weird latent issues like:
<rdar://problem/21900971> QoI: Bogus conversion error in generics case
Swift SVN r30429
return statements, or a return statement with no operand.
Also, fix a special-case diagnostic about converting a return
expression to (1) only apply to converting the actual return
expression, not an arbitrary sub-expression, and (2) use the
actual operand and return types, not the drilled-down types
that caused the failure.
Swift SVN r30420
RebindSelfInConstructorExpr, which gets issues related to
self.init and super.init onto the CallExpr best path, instead
of in the generic overload constraint failure morass.
Swift SVN r30067
argument list for a CallExpr instead of matching a gang of typevartypes against them.
This allows us to produce better matches in some cases.
Swift SVN r30065
facilities used by operators etc. This required a bunch of changes to make
the diagnostics changes strictly an improvement:
- Teach the new path about calls to TypeExprs.
- Teach evaluateCloseness some simple things about varargs.
- Make the generic diagnosis logic produce a better error when there is
exactly one match.
Overall, the resultant diagnostics are a step forward: we now produce candidate
set notes more uniformly, and the messages about some existing ones are
more specific. This is just another stepping stone towards progress though.
Swift SVN r30057
satisfying the request of <rdar://problem/20409366> Diagnostics for init calls should print the class name
I'm keeping that radar open though, because the case in it should get better still.
Swift SVN r30029
- Remove a weird special case for literals from TypeChecker::typeCheckCondition.
- Enhance FailureDiagnosis::getTypeOfIndependentSubExpression to know about situations
where recursive type checks fail (in some nested situation) but still produce a type
for the top level of the expr tree.
- Remove dead code from CSApply now that you can't branch on Builtin.Int1.
The first & second combine to slightly improve one case I've been looking at in
test/expr/expressions.swift.
Swift SVN r29860
expressions. Broadening from callexpr to apply expr (picking up operators) improves
several diagnostics in the testsuite, and is important to avoid regressions from an
upcoming patch.
Swift SVN r29821
This teaches overload constraint diagnosis to look at the resolved anchor
expression that fails (instead of assuming that it is the expr itself) and
walks up the AST to find the applyexpr in question. This allows us to give
much more specific diagnostics for overload resolution failures, and to give
much more specific location information.
Where before my recent patches we used to produce:
t.swift:2:3: error: cannot invoke 'assert' with an argument list of type '(Bool, String)'
assert(a != nil, "ASSERT COMPILATION ERROR")
^
t.swift:2:9: note: expected an argument list of type '(@autoclosure () -> Bool, @autoclosure () -> String, file: StaticString, line: UWord)'
assert(a != nil, "ASSERT COMPILATION ERROR")
^
with this and the other recent patches, we now produce:
t.swift:2:12: error: cannot invoke '!=' with an argument list of type '(Int, nil)'
assert(a != nil, "ASSERT COMPILATION ERROR")
~~^~~~~~
Swift SVN r29792
path associated with them, and to dig the expression the constraint refers to out
of the locator. Also teach simplifyLocator how to simplify closureexpr results out.
This eliminates a class of completely bogus diagnostics where the types reported
don't make any sense, resolving a class of radars like 19821875, where we now
produce excellent diagnostics.
That said, we still pick constraints to report that are unfortunate in some cases,
such as the example in expr/closure/closures.swift.
Swift SVN r29757
- Fix TypeCheckExpr.cpp to be more careful when propagating sugar from an
argument to the result of the function. We don't want to propagate parens,
because they show up in diagnostics later.
- Restructure FailureDiagnosis::diagnoseFailure() to strictly process the tree
in depth first order. Before it would only do this if contextual typing was
unavailable, leading to unpredictable inconsistencies between diagnostics.
- Always perform diagnoseContextualConversionError early, as part of the thing
that calls the visitor, instead of in each visit method. This may change in
the future, but is a simplification for now.
- Make the operator processing code handle the "candidate is an exact match"
case by emitting a diagnostic indicating that the result type of the operator
must not match expectations, instead of emitting the silly things like
"binary operator '&' cannot be applied to two Int operands" which is obviously
false.
These changes lead to minor improvements across the testsuite, and should make the
diagnostics more predictable for more complex real-world ones, but I haven't gone
through the radars yet.
Major missing pieces:
- CallExpr isn't using the same logic that the operators are.
- When you have a near match (only one argument mismatches) we should specifically
complain about that argument, instead of spewing an entire argument list.
- The noescape function attr diagnostic is being emitted twice now.
Swift SVN r29733
win from this other than simplification. Some minor wins are that we handle varargs
better and don't get extraneous ()'s in types in some cases.
Swift SVN r29729
them with diagnoseGeneralFailure() which would miss out on the common cases
where the subexpr of the ParenExpr is the issue.
For example, before we would produce:
t.swift:8:8: error: could not find an overload for '&' that accepts the supplied arguments
if !(x & 4.0) {}
~~~^~~~~~
now we produce:
t.swift:8:6: error: binary operator '&' cannot be applied to operands of type 'Int' and 'Double'
if !(x & 4.0) {}
^
t.swift:8:6: note: overloads for '&' exist with these partially matching parameter lists: (Int, Int)
if !(x & 4.0) {}
^
also, remove some special handling for lvalues and inout from overload
diagnostics, which can't matter anymore.
Swift SVN r29661
When a line begins with '.', it's almost always due to a method chain, not an attempt to start an expression with a contextual member lookup. This is a more principled grammar rule than the long tail of hacks we've been putting up to try to accommodate "builder pattern" usages. Fixes rdar://problem/20238557.
Swift SVN r29606
- If the closure being rewritten was nested inside of another
closure, we would rewrite the nested closure into a new closure
having cs.DC as its parent, rather than the DeclContext of the
outer closure as required.
- If the closure being rewritten had nested closures, the parent
DeclContext of the nested closures was set to the old closure,
not the new one.
Fix both problems by having coerceClosureExprToVoid() modify the
closure in place instead of creating a new closure.
Fixes <rdar://problem/20931915>.
Swift SVN r29563
