For context, String, Nil, and Bool already behave this way.
Note: Before it used to construct (call, ... (integer_literal)), and the
call would be made explicit / implicit based on if you did eg: Int(3) or
just 3. This however did not translate to the new world so this PR adds
a IsExplicitConversion bit to NumberLiteralExpr. Some side results of
all this are that some warnings changed a little and some instructions are
emitted in a different order.
Extend existing `RequirementFailure` functionality to support
conditional requirement failures. Such fixes are introduced
only if the parent type requirement has been matched successfully.
Resolves: rdar://problem/47871590
- Attempting to construct class object using metatype value via
non-required initializer
- Referencing initializer of protocol metatype base
Both of the diagnostics are used by `AllowInvalidInitRef` fix.
This fixes the last couple of instances of the interpreter not being
passed to the python the scripts which makes them fail on OSes where
shebangs are not honoured (i.e. Windows)
* Make sure that base and unwrapped types aren't null
* Don't allocate `ForceOptional` fix if nothing has been unwrapped
in `simplifyApplicableFnConstraint`
* Add sugar reconstitution support to `FailureDiagnostic::resolveType`
* Format diagnostics a bit better
When the compiler fails to find an overload with suitable parameter or return types, it often attaches a note listing the available overloads so that users can find the one they meant to use. The overloads are currently ordered in a way that depends on the order they were declared, so swift-evolve would sometimes cause tests involving these diagnostics to fail.
This change emits the list in a textually-sorted order instead. The names were already being sorted as they were inserted into a std::set, so this shouldn’t significantly slow down the diagnostic.
This allows us to skip attempting actual conversions.
This speeds up one of our slow test cases, and perturbs the output of
another test. In the latter case, we stop emitting conversions as part
of the non-semantic piece of the array_expr. The fact that we're not
putting conversions in on that path is something I've seen before in
other instances. I'll open a bug if I cannot find one for it, although
I believe it's entirely cosmetic in this case since we don't rely on
the conversion being there.
- Many tests got broken because of two things:
- AST dump now outputs to stdout, but many tests expected stderr. This was a straightforward fix.
- Many tests call swift with specific parameters; specifically, many call `swift frontend` directly. This makes them go through the compiler in unexpected ways, and specifically it makes them not have primary files, which breaks the new AST dump implementation. This commit adds the old implementation as a fallback for those cases, except it dumps to `stdout` to maintain some consistence.
Finally, the `/test/Driver/filelists.swift` failed for unknown reasons. It seems its output now had some lines out of order, and fixing the order made the test pass. However, as the reasons why it failed are unknown, this fix might not have been a good idea. Corrections are welcome.
Let's keep track of type mismatch between type deduced
for the body of the closure vs. what is requested
contextually, it makes it much easier to diagnose
problems like:
```swift
func foo(_: () -> Int) {}
foo { "hello" }
```
Because we can pin-point problematic area of the source
when the rest of the system is consistent.
Resolves: rdar://problem/40537960
when skipping to the end of the interpolated expression.
i.e. Skip the comment as a comment.
Previously, ')' or '"' in comment in interpolated expression used to
cause assertion failure or mis-compilation in no-assert build.
rdar://problem/20289969
This makes diagnostics more verbose and accurate, because
it's possible to distinguish how many parameters there are
based on the message itself.
Also there are multiple diagnostic messages in a format of
`<descriptive-kind> <decl-name> ...` that get printed as
e.g. `subscript 'subscript'` if empty labels are omitted.
`\.self` is the final chosen syntax. Implement support for this syntax, and remove the stopgap builtin and `WritableKeyPath._identity` property that were in place before.
We previously allowed these closures to default to (), but be inferred
as other types as well, which means that we will find some expressions
to be ambiguous because we end up finding multiple viable solutions
where there is really only one reasonable solution.
Fixes: rdar://problem/42337247
If generic parameter associated with missing conformance comes
from different context diagnose the problem as "referencing" a
specific declaration from affected type.
Instead of simply pointing out which type had conformance failures,
let's use affected declaration instead, which makes diagnostics much
richer e.g.
```
'List<[S], S.Id>' requires that 'S.Id' conform to 'Hashable'
```
versus
```
initializer 'init(_🆔)' requires that 'E' conform to 'Hashable' [with 'E' = 'S.Id']
```
Since latter message uses information about declaration, it can also
point to it in the source. That makes is much easier to understand when
problem is related to overloaded (function) declarations.
Since constraint solver has been improved to diagnose more problems
via "fixes", sometimes applying fixes might lead to producing solutions
which are completely ambiguous when compared to each other, and/or are
incomparable, which leads to `findBestSolutions` erasing all of them
while trying to compute best "partial" solution, which is incorrect.
Resolves: rdar://problem/42678836
Technically, these operations belong in the ObjectiveC module, where NSObject
is defined. Keep them there. However, we need to build the mock ObjectiveC
overlay with `-disable-objc-attr-requires-foundation-module` now.
...and collapse StaticVar/ClassVar and StaticLet/ClassLet into
StaticProperty/ClassProperty.
"var" and "let" aren't great nouns to use in diagnostics to begin with,
especially alongside semantic terms like "instance method". Focus on
the type vs. non-type aspect instead with "property", which better
matches how people talk about member vars (and lets) anyway.
