Commit Graph

154 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Pavel Yaskevich
17643a30e0 [ConstraintSystem] Move missing contextual protocol detection to matchExistentialTypes 2019-05-17 12:53:27 -07:00
Pavel Yaskevich
d4e8d583ae Revert "[ConstraintSystem] Use missing conformance fix to diagnose contextual failures" 2019-05-17 12:45:55 -07:00
Pavel Yaskevich
d5c561b44e [ConstraintSystem] Move missing contextual protocol detection to matchExistentialTypes 2019-05-15 15:37:36 -07:00
Brent Royal-Gordon
a72be0fb7d Sort overloads in suggestPotentialOverloads()
When the compiler fails to find an overload with suitable parameter or return types, it often attaches a note listing the available overloads so that users can find the one they meant to use. The overloads are currently ordered in a way that depends on the order they were declared, so swift-evolve would sometimes cause tests involving these diagnostics to fail.

This change emits the list in a textually-sorted order instead. The names were already being sorted as they were inserted into a std::set, so this shouldn’t significantly slow down the diagnostic.
2018-12-12 11:58:57 -08:00
Karoy Lorentey
666a22feff [test] Modernize hashing throughout the test suite 2018-11-29 17:38:29 +00:00
Mark Lacey
d7cf830842 [ConstraintSystem] Add Array as a designated type for + and +=.
Also add overloads for these operators to an extension of Array.

This allows us to typecheck array concatenation quickly with
designated type support enabled and the remaining type checker hacks
disabled.
2018-11-15 21:42:33 -08:00
gregomni
32bacc8980 More complicated as? test. 2018-08-16 14:27:44 -07:00
gregomni
ca48ebf390 Improve type coercion fixits for optional-to-optional conversions. 2018-08-16 09:43:47 -07:00
Mark Lacey
78d83e5703 Use %target-typecheck-verify-swift where possible. 2018-07-26 23:13:43 -07:00
Mark Lacey
9385dbb3fb Fix exponential type checking of tuple literals.
This fixes two easy cases where we would go exponential in type
checking tuple literals.

Instead of generating a conversion to a single type variable (which
results in one large constraint system), we generate a conversion ot
the same type that appears in the initializer expression (which for
tuples is a tuple type, which naturally splits the constraint system).

I experimented with trying to generalize this further, but ran into
problems getting it working, so for now this will have to do.

Fixes rdar://problem/20233198.
2018-03-26 14:46:03 -07:00
Mark Lacey
f08823757a IUO: Generate Optional<T> rather than ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>.
Stop creating ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> so that we can remove it
from the type system.

Enable the code that generates disjunctions for Optional<T> and
rewrites expressions based on the original declared type being 'T!'.

Most of the changes supporting this were previously merged to master,
but some things were difficult to merge to master without actually
removing IUOs from the type system:
- Dynamic member lookup and dynamic subscripting
- Changes to ensure the bridging peephole still works

Past commits have attempted to retain as much fidelity with how we
were printing things as possible. There are some cases where we still
are not printing things the same way:
- In diagnostics we will print '?' rather than '!'
- Some SourceKit and Code Completion output where we print a Type
  rather than Decl.

Things like module printing via swift-ide-test attempt to print '!'
any place that we now have Optional types that were declared as IUOs.

There are some diagnostics regressions related to the fact that we can
no longer "look through" IUOs. For the same reason some output and
functionality changes in Code Completion. I have an idea of how we can
restore these, and have opened a bug to investigate doing so.

There are some small source compatibility breaks that result from
this change:
- Results of dynamic lookup that are themselves declared IUO can in
  rare circumstances be inferred differently. This shows up in
  test/ClangImporter/objc_parse.swift, where we have
    var optStr = obj.nsstringProperty
  Rather than inferring optStr to be 'String!?', we now infer this to
  be 'String??', which is in line with the expectations of SE-0054.
  The fact that we were only inferring the outermost IUO to be an
  Optional in Swift 4 was a result of the incomplete implementation of
  SE-0054 as opposed to a particular design. This should rarely cause
  problems since in the common-case of actually using the property rather
  than just assigning it to a value with inferred type, we will behave
  the same way.
- Overloading functions with inout parameters strictly by a difference
  in optionality (i.e. Optional<T> vs. ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T>)
  will result in an error rather than the diagnostic that was added
  in Swift 4.1.
- Any place where '!' was being used where it wasn't supposed to be
  allowed by SE-0054 will now treat the '!' as if it were '?'.
  Swift 4.1 generates warnings for these saying that putting '!'
  in that location is deprecated. These locations include for example
  typealiases or any place where '!' is nested in another type like
  `Int!?` or `[Int!]`.

This commit effectively means ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is no
longer part of the type system, although I haven't actually removed
all of the code dealing with it yet.

ImplicitlyUnwrappedOptional<T> is is dead, long live implicitly
unwrapped Optional<T>!

Resolves rdar://problem/33272674.
2018-01-31 12:15:58 -08:00
Max Moiseev
54f79a40d7 Fix tests 2018-01-08 15:46:28 -08:00
Pavel Yaskevich
12980335cd [CSRanking] Fix self types to be unrelated when comparing operator decls
Such declarations should already have self bound as one of the parameters
which would enforce subtype relationship.

Resolves: rdar://problem/36333688
2018-01-05 23:24:24 -08:00
Max Moiseev
5a01af3da8 Merge pull request #13736 from moiseev/rrc-ops
[stdlib] Rearrange + on RangeReplaceableCollection/Sequence once again
2018-01-05 16:04:43 -08:00
Mark Lacey
d3b6d24d80 IUO: Do not short-circuit disjunctions if we had to apply fixes.
There are cases where disjunctions created for IUOs can be solved with
the Optional choice if a fix is applied. We do not want to stop with
this solution as we may be able to solve the constraint system without
a fix by selecting the non-Optional side.

I have opened a JIRA, SR-6626, to investigate one small regression in
diagnostics with this change.
2018-01-04 15:36:34 -08:00
Max Moiseev
9bf8d773ab [stdlib] Rearrange + on RangeReplaceableCollection/Sequence once again 2018-01-04 13:58:45 -08:00
Ben Cohen
9361a6b66f [stdlib] Nest Iterator and Index types for various stdlib types (#13489)
* Nest various top-level Iterator and Index types, and flatten extensions.

* Fix tests from nesting iterator

* Nest Unsafe*BufferPointer.Iterator, extensionify UnsafeBufferPointer

* Degyb LazyCollection

* Nest Flatten iterator and index
2017-12-18 15:27:35 -08:00
Doug Gregor
ba6f605d47 Fix some tests due to Equatable Optional/Array/Dictionary change. 2017-11-27 21:09:50 -08:00
Greg Parker
e8475cc130 Revert "Use conditional conformances to implement Equatable for Optional, Array and Dictionary" 2017-11-15 14:17:22 -08:00
Doug Gregor
1f9b28a117 [Type checker diags] Check generic arguments for any generic function.
This includes functions without type parameters that are generic
because they are members of a generic context. This addresses a
diagnostics regression because the '==' operators for Optional, Array,
and Dictionary were made into members.

The resulting error message is a little ugly, but is more informative
(and much shorter) than what we had before.
2017-11-14 16:23:20 -08:00
Max Moiseev
6ea3644568 [stdlib] Clarify an availability message for % on floating point types
<rdar://problem/27855641>
2017-09-29 12:18:15 -07:00
Jordan Rose
f8b7db4e76 Excise the terms "blacklist" and "whitelist" from Swift source. (#11687)
The etymology of these terms isn't about race, but "black" = "blocked"
and "white" = "allowed" isn't really a good look these days. In most
cases we weren't using these terms particularly precisely anyway, so
the rephrasing is actually an improvement.
2017-08-30 09:28:00 -07:00
Max Moiseev
2c9be47551 Merge branch 'master' into new-integer-protocols 2017-03-23 16:46:01 -07:00
Doug Gregor
d9fa16bccb [GSB] Diagnose explicit constraints made redundant by inferred ones. 2017-03-22 17:35:11 -07:00
Max Moiseev
3522f3c47c Fixing tests with artihmetic operators back on concrete types 2017-01-23 14:56:29 -08:00
Max Moiseev
a167238d1d Fixing more tests 2017-01-12 15:54:56 -08:00
Max Moiseev
27889c6376 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into new-integer-protocols 2017-01-06 15:54:44 -08:00
Doug Gregor
dcdef4f7f5 [Type checker] Improve "downcast only unwraps optionals" diagnostics.
Specialize and improve the "downcast only unwraps optionals"
diagnostic to provide specific diagnostics + Fix-Its for the various
casts of forced cast, conditional cast, and "isa" check. Specifically:

* With a forced cast, customize the diagnostic. We still insert the
  appropriate number of !'s, but now we remove the 'as! T' (if an
  implicit conversion would suffice) or replace the 'as!' with 'as'
  (if we still need a bridge)

* With a conditional cast, only emit a diagnostic if we're removing
  just one level of optional. In such cases, we either have a no-op
  (an implicit conversion would do) or we could just use 'as' to the
  optional type, so emit a customized warning to do that. If we are
  removing more than one level of optional, don't complain:
  conditional casts can remove optionals. Add the appropriate Fix-Its
  here.

* With an 'is' expression, only emit a diagnostic if we're removing
  just one level of optional. In this case, the 'is' check is
  equivalent to '!= nil'. Add a Fix-It for that.

Across the board, reduce the error to a warning. These are
semantically-well-formed casts, it's just that they could be written
better.

Fixes rdar://problem/28856049 and rdar://problem/22275685.
2016-12-21 13:47:19 -08:00
Max Moiseev
70b2343626 Merge branch 'master' into new-integer-protocols 2016-11-28 15:25:01 -08:00
David Farler
b7d17b25ba Rename -parse flag to -typecheck
A parse-only option is needed for parse performance tracking and the
current option also includes semantic analysis.
2016-11-28 10:50:55 -08:00
Max Moiseev
3d4f00091d Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into new-integer-protocols 2016-10-28 15:55:40 -07:00
Pavel Yaskevich
dd01b7e184 [Diagnostics] SR-2208: Improve failure diagnostics for apply expressions 2016-10-26 14:34:05 -07:00
Max Moiseev
8d1155c2b9 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into new-integer-protocols 2016-10-17 11:29:07 -07:00
Pavel Yaskevich
f526a251c6 [Diagnostics] SR-1255: Improve diagnostic when one of the parameters marked as autoclosure 2016-10-11 14:43:37 -07:00
Max Moiseev
6803cda05c Merge branch 'master' into new-integer-protocols 2016-09-26 11:39:46 -07:00
Jordan Rose
caeed32302 Add a fix-it for missing generic parameters on construction.
For example, if someone tries to use the newly-generic type Cache,
from Foundation:

  var cache = Cache()

they'll now get a fix-it to substitute the default generic parameters:

  var cache = Cache<AnyObject, AnyObject>()

The rules for choosing this placeholder type are based on constraints
and won't be right 100% of the time, but they should be reasonable.
(In particular, constraints on associated types are ignored.)
In cases where there's no one concrete type that will work, an Xcode-
style placeholder is inserted instead.

- An unconstrained generic parameter defaults to 'Any'.
- A superclass-constrained parameter defaults to that class,
  e.g. 'UIView'.
- A parameter constrained to a single @objc protocol (or to AnyObject)
  defaults to that protocol, e.g. 'NSCoding'.
- Anything else gets a placeholder using the generic parameter's name
  and protocol composition syntax.

rdar://problem/27087345
2016-09-21 18:04:14 -06:00
Max Moiseev
ea8e0f0e15 Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into new-integer-protocols 2016-09-21 14:48:35 -07:00
Mark Lacey
401ca24532 Emit a warning when optionals are coerced to Any.
Emit a warning for optionals that are implicitly converted to Any, and
add fixits giving options to:
- Add '??' with a default value after
- Force-unwrap the optional with '!'
- Explicitly cast to 'as Any' to silence the warning

This covers diagnostics aspect of SE-0140.

rdar://problem/28196843
2016-09-20 22:33:45 -07:00
practicalswift
fa7fbdb8b0 [gardening] Remove redundant nil-initialization of optional variable
From the Swift documentation:

"If you define an optional variable without providing a default value,
 the variable is automatically set to nil for you."
2016-09-18 07:40:07 +02:00
Doug Gregor
51529ae888 Eliminate the -enable-id-as-any flag; it's always on now anyway.
Simplify e.g., ASTContext::getBridgedToObjC(), which no longer needs
the optional return.

Eliminate the now-unused constraint kind for checking bridging to
Objective-C.
2016-08-19 21:17:09 -07:00
Doug Gregor
22287ddb58 [Type system] Infer 'Any' for array elements and dictionary values and 'AnyHashable' for dictionary keys.
The id-as-Any work regressed cases where Swift code could specify
heterogeneous collection literals, e.g.,

    var states: [String: Any] = [
      "California": [
        "population": 37_000_000,
        "cities": ["Los Angeles", "San Diego", "San Jose"],
      ],
      "Oregon": [
        "population": 4_000_000,
        "cities": ["Portland", "Salem", "Eugene"],
      ]
    ]

Prior to this, the code worked (when Foundation was imported) because
we'd end up with literals of type [NSObject : AnyObject].

The new defaulting rule says that the element type of an array literal
and the key/value types of a dictionary literal can be defaulted if no
stronger type can be inferred. The default type is:

  Any, for the element type of an array literal or the value type of a
  dictionary literal, or

  AnyHashable, for the key type of a dictionary literal.

The latter is intended to compose with implicit conversions to
AnyHashable, so the most-general inferred dictionary type is
[AnyHashable : Any] and will work for any plausible dictionary
literal.

To prevent this inference from diluting types too greatly, we don't
allow this inference in "top-level" expressions, e.g.,

  let d = ["a" : 1, "b" : "two"]

will produce an error because it's a heterogeneous dictionary literal
at the top level. One should annotate this with, e.g.,

  let d = ["a" : 1, "b" : "two"] as [String : Any]

However, we do permit heterogeneous collections in nested positions,
to support cases like the original motivating example.

Fixes rdar://problem/27661580.
2016-08-04 20:58:13 -07:00
Joe Groff
62afa03eb9 Improve Foundation overlay to handle bridging subscripts and dictionary literals.
SE-0072 took implicit bridging conversions away, which regressed the ability to express NSDictionaries as dictionary literals and index them using literal keys. Address this by changing the signature of init(dictionaryLiteral:) to use Hashable and Any, and by replacing the subscript from Objective-C with one using _Hashable that does the bridging on the user's behalf. This largely restores the QoI of working with NS collections.
2016-08-04 08:42:36 -07:00
Dave Abrahams
d4030a9715 [stdlib] Fix constraint tests for new integers 2016-07-29 18:30:24 -07:00
Joe Groff
2a5b9d6559 Remove now-dead _isBridgedToObjectiveC() declarations in _ObjectiveCBridgeable conformers. 2016-07-28 12:29:47 -07:00
Joe Groff
a6c05f3bc0 Sema: Gratuitously wrap synthesized bridging calls in ParenExprs.
Thwart the tuple splatting checker when converting a value `as AnyObject`.
2016-07-27 16:20:51 -07:00
Joe Groff
b9d21b4540 Reinstate SE-0072. Revert "Pending QOI improvements, reinstate implicit bridging conversions."
This reverts commit 6542100d62. SE-0116
expands Objective-C `id` to Swift `Any`, moving the conversion into the
bridging mechanism rather than the type system.
2016-07-25 06:01:21 -07:00
Joe Groff
bbdca55dd0 Sema: Containers of any type can bridge when id-as-Any is enabled.
We no longer need to constrain the generic parameters to be ObjC-bridgeable.
2016-07-25 06:01:21 -07:00
Andrew Trick
72b8813a64 Restore operator '+' family for UnsafePointer. (#3719)
The reverts part of my previous patch. Removing the operators is too much of a
performance penalty to take. The difference is that the Strideable operators are
not transparent.

I still need to remove the UnsafeRawPointer operators, so -Onone performance
will be bad in some cases until this is fixed:
<rdar://problem/27513184> [perf] Strideable operators are not transparent. This is a huge -Onone performance penalty.
2016-07-23 18:58:55 -07:00
Andrew Trick
198173b17b Remove the global operator '+' family from UnsafePointer and UnsafeRawPointer.
Generic versions of these functions are provided by Strideable.

This is required for SE-0107: UnsafeRawPointer. Otherwise, the presence
of non-generic operator overloads will conflict with existing operators
on String.
2016-07-22 22:14:19 -07:00
Andrew Trick
a41484ea2b Add UnsafeRawPointer type and API. (#3677)
* Add UnsafeRawPointer type and API.

As proposed in SE-0107:   UnsafeRawPointer.
https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0107-unsaferawpointer.md

The fundamental difference between Unsafe[Mutable]RawPointer and
Unsafe[Mutable]Pointer<Pointee> is simply that the former is used for "untyped"
memory access, and the later is used for "typed" memory access. Let's refer to
these as "raw pointers" and "typed pointers". Because operations on raw pointers
access untyped memory, the compiler cannot make assumptions about the underlying
type of memory and must be conservative. With operations on typed pointers, the
compiler may make strict assumptions about the type of the underlying memory,
which allows more aggressive optimization.

Memory can only be accessed by a typed pointer when it is currently
bound to the Pointee type. Memory can be bound to type `T` via:
- `UnsafePointer<T>.allocate(capacity: n)`
- `UnsafePointer<Pointee>.withMemoryRebound(to: T.self, capacity: n) {...}`
- `UnsafeMutableRawPointer.initializeMemory(as: T.self, at: i, count: n, to: x)`
- `UnsafeMutableRawPointer.initializeMemory(as: T.self, from: p, count: n)`
- `UnsafeMutableRawPointer.moveInitializeMemory(as: T.self, from: p, count: n)`
- `UnsafeMutableRawPointer.bindMemory(to: T.self, capacity: n)`

Mangle UnsafeRawPointer as predefined substitution 'Sv' for Swift void
pointer ([urp] are taken).

* UnsafeRawPointer minor improvements.

Incorporate Dmitri's feedback.

Properly use a _memmove helper.

Add load/storeBytes alignment precondition checks.

Reword comments.

Demangler tests.

* Fix name mangling test cases.

* Fix bind_memory specialization.
2016-07-22 13:32:08 -07:00