This patch adds powerpc64le Linux support. While the patch also adds
the matching powerpc64 bits, there are endian issues that need to be
sorted out.
The PowerPC LLVM changes for the swift ABI (eg returning three element
non-homogeneous aggregates) are still in the works, but a simple LLVM
fix to allow those aggregates results in swift passing all but 8
test cases.
Getting a superclass, instance extents, and whether a class is native-refcounted are all useful type API. De-underscore these functions and give them a consistent `swift[_objc]_class*` naming scheme.
There was previously no way to detect a type that is nominally
Optional at runtime. The standard library, namely OutputStream, needs
to handle Optionals specially in order to cirumvent conversion to the
Optional's wrapped type. This should be done with conditional
conformance, but until that feature is available, Builtin.isOptional
will serve as a useful crutch.
This reflects the fact that the attribute's only for compiler-internal use, and isn't really equivalent to C's asm attribute, since it doesn't change the calling convention to be C-compatible.
<slight revision of yesterday's reverted commit>
The debugAsserts were nicely self-documenting, but generate an obscene
amount of useless SIL code that is inlined everywhere and sticks around
when we compile the stdlib. The old asserts would need to be fixed to
support Optionals but that makes the situation much worse.
Why is it ok to remove the asserts?
_unsafeReferenceCast remains an internal API.
If the src/dest types are not loadable reference types, the cast will
not be promoted to a value bitcast.
The remanining cases will be dynamically checked by swift_dynamicCast.
Swift SVN r32828
Revert "For unsafeReferenceCast rely on static verifier checks."
This reverts commit r32796.
This reverts commit r32795.
They very likely broke a buildbot.
Swift SVN r32813
The debugAsserts were nicely self-documenting, but generate an obscene
amount of useless SIL code that is inlined everywhere and sticks around
when we compile the stdlib. The old asserts would need to be fixed to
support Optionals but that makes the situation much worse.
Why is it ok to remove the asserts?
_unsafeReferenceCast remains an internal API. The invariants are checked
statically whenever the routine is specialized, and dynamically checked
by the runtime cast.
Swift SVN r32795
Generally avoid casting to a raw pointer unless a raw pointer is needed.
Builtin.castReference is now the canonical way to cast reference types.
Canonical generally = better optimizer. In practice this will reduce to
the same SIL since the stdlib code will be optimized.
There are enough unit tests for unsafeDowncast and Builtin.castReference.
I measured no performance regressions.
Swift SVN r32646
_unsafeCastReference allows casting of any references types, regardless
of whether they are references to objects or class existentials. The
implementation is responsible for converting between representations.
_unsafeCastReference provides a dynamic check to ensure that the source
and dest are both actually references. If not, the implementation will
trap at runtime. Generally, the optimizer can prove that the source
and dest are references, and promote this cast to an
unchecked_ref_cast bitcast. There is no dynamic check that the
references types are compatible.
This differs from unsafeDownCast in two ways:
(1) The source and dest types are not statically typed
AnyObjects. Therefore, unsafeCastReference can be used when the
surrounding code dynamically handles both reference and nonreference
types.
(2) The source and dest also need not dynamically conform to AnyObject.
Either side of the cast may be a class existential. The primary
requirement is that the source and dest refer to the same reference
counted object.
Swift SVN r32588
This avoids unnecessary address-taking. Instead use the builtin that directly
supports unsafe casts. The optimizer now follows clear rules for
Builtin.reinterpretCast (so it's safe to use) and knows how to optimize it.
Swift SVN r32268
This is a low-level API that bypasses the usual type checks. To avoid
misuse, we add a dynamic type check that kicks in when stdlib asserts
are enabled.
Swift SVN r30311
Currently they do nothing but allow stdlib code to use regular (Bool)
types. However, soon the wrappers for the _native variants will
provide point-of-use sanity checking.
These need to be fully generic to support class protocols and
single-payload enums (not just for optional). It also avoids a massive
amount of overloading for all the reference type variations
(AnyObject, Native, Unknown, Bridge) x 2 for optional versions of
each.
Because the wrapper is generic, type checking had to be deferred until
IRGen. Generating code for the wrapper itself will result in an
IRGen-time type error. They need to be transparent anyway for proper
diagnostics, but also must be internal.
Note that the similar external API type checks ok because it
forces conformance to AnyObject.
The sanity checks are disabled because our current facilities for
unsafe type casting are incomplete and unsound. SILCombine can
remove UnsafeMutablePointer and RawPointer casts by assuming layout
compatibility. IRGen will later discover layout incompatibility and
generate a trap.
I'll send out a proposal for improving the casting situation so we can
get the sanity checks back.
Swift SVN r28057
includes a number of QoI things to help people write the correct code. I will commit
the testcase for it as the next patch.
The bulk of this patch is moving the stdlib, testsuite and validation testsuite to
the new syntax. I moved a few uses of "as" patterns back to as? expressions in the
stdlib as well.
Swift SVN r27959
This reverts commit 64e9f11211a19fa603f5bc2d2bea171a9b07d3fa.
I think this is breaking ExistentialCollection test in the
Release + stdlib asserts build.
Swift SVN r27947
The wrappers for the _native variants provide point-of-use sanity checking.
They also allows stdlib code to use regular (Bool) types.
These need to be fully generic to support class protocols. It also
avoids a massive amount of overloading for all the reference type
variations (AnyObject, Native, Unknown, Bridge) x 2 for optional
versions of each.
Because the wrapper is generic, type checking had to be deferred until
IRGen. Generating code for the wrapper itself will result in an
IRGen-time type error. They need to be transparent anyway for proper
diagnostics, but also must be internal.
The external API passes type checks because it forces conformance to AnyObject.
Swift SVN r27930
The rule changes are as follows:
* All functions (introduced with the 'func' keyword) have argument
labels for arguments beyond the first, by default. Methods are no
longer special in this regard.
* The presence of a default argument no longer implies an argument
label.
The actual changes to the parser and printer are fairly simple; the
rest of the noise is updating the standard library, overlays, tests,
etc.
With the standard library, this change is intended to be API neutral:
I've added/removed #'s and _'s as appropriate to keep the user
interface the same. If we want to separately consider using argument
labels for more free functions now that the defaults in the language
have shifted, we can tackle that separately.
Fixes rdar://problem/17218256.
Swift SVN r27704
This changes 'if let' conditions to take general refutable patterns, instead of
taking a irrefutable pattern and implicitly matching against an optional.
Where before you might have written:
if let x = foo() {
you now need to write:
if let x? = foo() {
The upshot of this is that you can write anything in an 'if let' that you can
write in a 'case let' in a switch statement, which is pretty general.
To aid with migration, this special cases certain really common patterns like
the above (and any other irrefutable cases, like "if let (a,b) = foo()", and
tells you where to insert the ?. It also special cases type annotations like
"if let x : AnyObject = " since they are no longer allowed.
For transitional purposes, I have intentionally downgraded the most common
diagnostic into a warning instead of an error. This means that you'll get:
t.swift:26:10: warning: condition requires a refutable pattern match; did you mean to match an optional?
if let a = f() {
^
?
I think this is important to stage in, because this is a pretty significant
source breaking change and not everyone internally may want to deal with it
at the same time. I filed 20166013 to remember to upgrade this to an error.
In addition to being a nice user feature, this is a nice cleanup of the guts
of the compiler, since it eliminates the "isConditional()" bit from
PatternBindingDecl, along with the special case logic in the compiler to handle
it (which variously added and removed Optional around these things).
Swift SVN r26150
