We don't currently use this for anything, but if we have the module name
available and easy to access in the bitstream, we can drop the wrapper
around the serialized AST that's put into the binary itself for use by LLDB.
Swift SVN r12919
The only reason to do this was in case an extension adopted a compiler-known
protocol, but that has long ben taken care of by
ModuleFile::loadDeclsConformingTo.
Swift SVN r11224
There shouldn't ever be a reason to do this: if a conversion function is
ever selected by the type-checker, it's because the type the conversion
lives on was suggested by another constraint, which means we can do a
normal lookup for the conversion function.
This is actually the only thing being eagerly deserialized, so remove the
notion of eager deserialization altogether.
Swift SVN r11220
Since we don't have soft-failure yet from deserialization, it's helpful to
at least know where to start looking when something crashes. There are some
rough edges here but it should be much better than nothing.
This also pulls the list of record nodes out into a separate file, so that
we can avoid repeating it.
Example crash:
1. While reading from ./CTypes.swiftmodule
2. While deserializing 'CBool' (StructDecl)
3. While deserializing decl #26 (XREF)
4. Cross-reference to 'LogicValue' in swift
(don't worry, this is an example where I'm tweaking things)
<rdar://problem/14838332>
Swift SVN r11057
Each loaded file gets added to the main module, rather than being a standalone
separate module. In theory, this will be used to assemble several partial
ASTs into a complete module. In practice, there's still a ways to go...but
this can already round-trip a single module file.
This also factors out the FileUnit-creating part of SerializedModuleLoader,
which should help clients like SourceKit that don't need to search for a
swiftmodule file associated with a particular import.
Swift SVN r10952
Part of the FileUnit restructuring. A serialized module is now represented as
a TranslationUnit containing a single SerializedASTFile.
As part of this change, the FileUnit interface has been made virtual, rather
than switching on the Kind in every accessor. We think the operations
performed on files are sufficiently high-level that this shouldn't affect us.
A nice side effect of all this is that we now properly model the visibility
of modules imported into source files. Previously, we would always consider
the top-level imports of all files within a target, whether re-exported or
not.
We may still end up wanting to distinguish properties of a complete Swift
module file from a partial AST file, but we can do that within
SerializedModuleLoader.
Swift SVN r10832
Previously we would cache the results of operator lookup whether or not the
operator we found came from an imported module. Since different source files
can have different imports, it's not correct to automatically share operators
from imported modules with all files in the translation unit.
This still isn't fully correct; the current logic prefers operators from
local imports over operators implicitly available from other source files.
Swift SVN r9683
Semantic context describes the origin of the declaration and serves the same
purpose as opaque numeric "priority" in Clang -- to determine the most likely
completion.
This is the initial implementation. There are a few opportunities to bump the
priority of a certain decl by giving it SemanticContextKind::ExprSpecific
context that are not implemented yet.
Swift SVN r9052
SerializedSILLoader to hold a list of SIL deserializers.
Also add an intial implementation of a linking pass that is run right after
SILGen to link the declaration of SILFunction to the actual definition in
the serialized module.
We add two blocks to the serialized module: a sil index block that
maps identifier to a function ID and also holds a list of function offsets,
and a sil block for the actual SILFunctions. We can probably use subblock
instead of two top-level blocks.
The serialization/de-serialization of the function hash table and the function
offsets are implemented. But we are missing handling of types (see FIXME in
the code).
ModuleFile::Serialized is made public to be used by SIL deserializer, as well
as ModuleFile::getType.
The SIL deserializer holds a pointer to the ModuleFile, it gets the sil cursor
and the sil index cursor from the ModuleFile. The other option is for SIL
deserializer to find the start of the two sil blocks within itself, thus having
less coupling with ModuleFile.
No testing case yet because we are missing handling of types.
Swift SVN r8206
few SIL instructions types.
This will be tested when we have a SIL deserializer. Testing cases covering
each implemented SIL instruction will be added.
Swift SVN r8094
getDisplayDecls() was introduced for ":print_module" and works slightly differently, e.g.
it will return the decls from a shadowed clang module, since we want to display them.
Swift SVN r7909
Per discussion with Doug, there's no reason why this should not work:
class Outer {
class Inner {
func extract() { ... }
}
}
var obj : DynamicLookup = ...
obj.extract!()
Swift SVN r7763
As a bring-up hack, the module serializer would write a special record,
FALL_BACK_TO_TRANSLATION_UNIT, if it encountered something it didn't know
how to serialize. This then directed the deserializer to ignore the
contents of the module file and instead reload the original source file.
Now that we can serialize pretty much everything*, though, we don't need
this, and instead we'd rather know where the serialization coverage has
gaps (by asserting).
Swift SVN r7752
This isn't very efficient: it scans every decl in the Clang TU (forcing
deserialization) and filters based on the decl's enclosing module.
Moreover, since getClangModuleForDecl() currently only handles top-level
modules, all submodules get implicitly added to the top-level module...
and will /not/ match an explicit submodule request.
(This is probably close to the behavior we actually want: include decls that
are from modules that are (a) submodules and (b) re-exported by the top-level
module. We do want that extra check, though, and we would want to find things
specifically by submodule.)
Swift SVN r7602
This is basically the same as doing a :print_decl on every decl in the module,
except that it does not print extensions that come from other modules, and
/does/ print extensions and operators that come from this module.
Does not yet work for Clang modules or the Builtin module.
Swift SVN r7601
In Swift, a module is expected to know which libraries it needs, rather than
having this specified by an external module map. While we haven't quite
designed this yet (frameworks get this for free in Clang, for example),
we can at least provide a simple option for the common case of a module
associated with a single library.
This will probably change in the future, so I left in the more general
deserialization code I was working on before simplifying the use case.
A loaded module can in theory specify any arbitrary frameworks or libraries
as dependencies, not just a single dylib.
Swift SVN r7583
...instead of just those that are re-exported. This will be used for
autolinking (and probably few other places).
As part of this, we get two name changes:
(1) Module::getReexportedModules -> getImportedModules
(2) TranslationUnit::getImportedModules -> getImports
The latter doesn't just get modules-plus-access-paths; it also includes
whether or not the import is re-exported. Mainly, though, it just didn't
seem like a good idea to overload this name when the two functions aren't
really related.
No tests yet, will come with autolinking.
Swift SVN r7487
Previously, TypeAliasDecl was used for typealiases, generic
parameters, and assocaited types, which is hideous and the source of
much confusion. Factor the latter two out into their own decl nodes,
with a common abstract base for "type parameters", and push these
nodes throughout the frontend.
No real functionality change, but this is a step toward uniquing
polymorphic types, among other things.
Swift SVN r7345
This separates the concerns of "deserialization the AST structures" from
"reading and accessing a module file".
No functionality change.
Swift SVN r7338
This will be used to resolve properties and method calls on objects with
dynamic-lookup ("id") type. For now, this is tested in swift-ide-test
by using the -dynamic-lookup-completion option and providing a
-code-completion-token value.
Caveats/TODOs:
- As before, since we're using the global method pool, this isn't scoped by
module. We could do a per-module filter, but I don't know if that will
actually buy us much.
- Again, Clang's method pool does not include methods from protocols.
- Lookup by selector name cannot find properties with a customized getter
name. <rdar://problem/14776565>
- The Clang-side method pool is keyed by selector, but Swift wants to look
things up by method name, which maps to the first selector piece, so we
end up having to do a scan of all the selectors in the pool.
Swift SVN r7330
Break cycles agressively when we find circular class inheritance. The
stronger AST invariants prevent us from having to check for loops
everywhere in the front end.
Swift SVN r7325
First, make it actually check for cycles properly. Second, pull it
into the checking of the protocol itself, rather than keeping it as a
separate pass that happens too late to be useful. Finally, put the
unchecked/checking/checked bits into the AST to avoid having to keep a
separate DenseMap just for this purpose. Fixes <rdar://problem/14750346>.
Swift SVN r7324
With this, we can now get a list of all class members* available in the
current translation unit, which will be necessary for doing id-style
dynamic lookup (inferring which method you're referring to when the base
type is some magic "dynamic lookup" type).
* Including members of protocols, since a class we don't know about could
have implemented the protocol.
Since there is no code currently using this, I've added a new mode to
swift-ide-test to just dump all class members -- what will eventually
happen when you code complete on a dynamic lookup type. This mode will
go away once the other pieces of id-style lookup are in place.
Swift SVN r7287
Deserializing a typealias's underlying type can lead to us trying to
deserialize the alias again. When we get back to the outer request,
check to see if there was an inner request, in which case we don't need
to do anything else.
<rdar://problem/14757837>
Swift SVN r7280
...by adding a new callback to ModuleLoader: loadDeclsConformingTo.
This is used only when the type checker doesn't have enough contextual
information to resolve an expression involving a literal, so it's
possible many *LiteralConvertible types will never be loaded.
Deserialization of types with conversion methods is still eager, since
there's no easy hook to tell when they're needed, but the list has been
renamed to refer to any decls that need to be eagerly deserialized, in
case we need it for other purposes in the future.
This probably won't help much in a real program, but it cuts the test
run time by about 5-10% in my build.
Swift SVN r7268
This is really two commits in one: first, change the AST and TypeChecker
to only track conformances to known protocols, and second, make sure we
can deserialize decls that conform to known protocols on demand. The
latter is necessary for the type checker to solve constraint systems that
are not fully constrained, and also requires tracking decls with conversion
methods.
Currently decls conforming to known protocols are eagerly deserialized;
that will change soon to be a new ModuleLoader callback. Decls with
conversion functions will continue to be eagerly deserialized for the near
future.
This fixes the initial regressions in making decl deserialization lazy.
Swift SVN r7264
This also makes extension-loading slightly more precise; if asked to
load extensions for some struct Foo, we will load extensions for /every/
struct Foo...but now we won't /also/ load extensions for every /class/ Foo.
Swift SVN r7260
This switches from simple lists of decls to name-based on-disk hash tables,
which allows decls to be loaded lazily when doing simple lookup (but not
code completion, at least not yet).
The on-disk hash table implementation is borrowed from Clang; eventually
it will be pushed down to LLVM's Support library. (Fortunately the
implementation is header-only.)
This breaks a few tests that rely on magic protocols like
IntegerLiteralConvertible, because the type checker won't have seen the
types that conform to those protocols yet. This will be fixed by doing
an additional "hey, modules, got any of these?" lookup.
Swift SVN r7259
Teach the ArchetypeBuilder how to use callbacks to get at the
protocols from which a protocol inherits and to which an associated
type conforms, so that we can use the type checker's lazy resolution
here.
Swift SVN r7107
- New type representation OptionalTypeRepr.
- New sugared type OptionalType.
- New base type SyntaxSugarType, parent of ArraySliceType and OptionalType.
These two are the same in a lot of ways.
- The form "T[]?" is forbidden, because it makes "Int[4][2]" oddly
different from "Int[4]?[2]". The type can be spelled "(T[])?" or
Optional<T[]>.
- Like Slice, "Optional" is just looked up in the current module. This may
or may not be the desired behavior in the long run.
<rdar://problem/14666783>
Swift SVN r7100
This should complete support for Swift-side export control.
Note that a TU's imports are still all "re-exported" (i.e. returned from
getReexportedModules) whether they are marked [exported] or not. This is
a convenient trick to get lookup in the main source file to look at all
imported modules, but if we allow real multi-TU compilation we'll have to
revisit this.
Swift SVN r7052
Previously, a module contained references to every module listed in the
ASTContext. Now, we actually only encode the imports from the TU itself,
which allows us to include access paths for scoped imports.
This is necessary to implement proper name lookup shadowing rules.
Swift SVN r7013
We can get to these transitively; we should only record what the TU
actually claims to reference.
It turns out that we were still relying on this to force the load of
adapter modules for Clang modules. For now, we just force that up front,
even though currently that also forces the creation of ClangModule
wrappers for all transitive includes.
No intended visible functionality change.
Swift SVN r7012
The current implementation of dealloc_stack in IR-gen is a
no-op, but that's very much wrong for types with non-trivial
local allocation requirements, e.g. archetypes. So we need
to be able to do non-trivial code here. However, that means
modeling both the buffer pointer and the allocated address
in SIL.
To make this more type-safe, introduce a SIL-specific
'[local_storage] T' type that represents the required
allocation for locally storing a T. alloc_stack now returns
one of those in additon to a *T, and dealloc_stack expects
the former.
IR-gen still implements dealloc_stack as a no-op, but
that's now easy to fix.
Swift SVN r6937
Factor the ProtocolConformance class into a small hierarchy of
protocol conformances:
- "normal" conformance, which provides a complete mapping for the
explicit conformance of a nominal type (which may be generic) to a
protocol;
- "specialized" conformance, which specializes a generic
conformance by applying a set of substitutions; and
- "inherited" conformance, which projects the conformance from a
superclass to a conformance for a subclass.
In this scheme "normal" conformances are fairly heavyweight, because
they provide a complete mapping. Normal conformances are unique,
because they're associated with explicit conformance declarations
(which cannot be repeated within a module; checking is TBD). Thus, IR
generation will eventually emit them as strong symbols.
"Specialized" and "inherited" conformances occur when we're dealing
with generic specializations or subclasses. They project most of their
members through to some underlying conformance, eventually landing at
a "normal" conformance. ASTContext is responsible for uniquing these
conformances when it sees them. The IR generation model for
specialized conformances will involve runtime specialization of the
underlying witness table; inherited conformances are probably no-ops
from the IR generation perspective.
Aside from being the right thing to do, having small, uniqued
conformances for the specialization and inheritance cases is good for
compile-time performance and memory usage. We're not really taking
advantage of this everywhere we could, yet.
This change uncovered a few existing issues (one known, one not
known), particularly because we're projecting inherited conformances
rather than building new conformances:
- <rdar://problem/14620454>: protocol witnesses to methods of
classes need to perform dynamic dispatch. See the
test/Interpreter/typeof.swift test for an example.
- <rdar://problem/14637688>: comparing NSString and String with ==
fails, because they are inter-convertible. I suspect we were missing
some protocol conformances previously, and therefore accepting this
obviously-invalid code.
Swift SVN r6865
Note that the import kind is not checked yet; this is effectively our old
behavior for "import swift.print".
Infrastructure: move Module::forAllVisibleModules out-of-line, and add
makeStackLambda to STLExtras for using a non-escaping lambda with
std::function.
Swift SVN r6852
