If a protocol does not inherit Sendable, we still say that the
existential type is Sendable in Swift 5 mode. Make sure this
doesn't crash the SIL specializer.
Fixes https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/75728
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
Workaround for rdar://119950540 when dealing with invertible protocols.
This should be sound because "its an invariant that subst() on a
conformance returns the same thing as a global lookup with subst() of
the conforming type, assuming you don't have overlapping conformances."
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
There are a lot of problems caused by our highly-abstract substitution
subsystem. Most of them would be solved by a more semantic / holistic
understanding of the active transformation, but that's difficult to do
because we just pass around function_refs. The first step in fixing
that is to pass around a better currency type. For now, it can just
hold the function_refs (and the SubstOptions).
I've set it up so that the places that just apply SubstitutionMaps
are constructing the IFS in a standard way; that should make it easy
to change those places in the future.
