To describe fine grained priorities.
Introduce 'CodeCompletionFlair' that is a set of more descriptive flags for
prioritizing completion items. This aims to replace '
SemanticContextKind::ExpressionSpecific' which was a "catch all"
prioritization flag.
struct Foo {
init(_ arg1: String, arg2: Int) {}
init(label: Int) {}
}
func test(strVal: String) {
_ = Foo(<HERE>)
}
In this case, 'strVal' was prioritized because it can use as an argument
for 'init(_:arg2:)'. However, argument labels are almost always
preferable, and if the user actually want 'strVal', they can input a few
characters to get it at the top. So we should always prioritize call
argument patterns.
rdar://77188260
Combine IsNotRecommended with NotRecommendedReason and improve the names
of the existing cases to more clearly identify the cases they apply to.
Now all not-recommended completions are required to have a reason.
To help consolidate our various types describing imports, this commit moves the following types and methods to Import.h:
* ImplicitImports
* ImplicitStdlibKind
* ImplicitImportInfo
* ModuleDecl::ImportedModule
* ModuleDecl::OrderImportedModules (as ImportedModule::Order)
* ModuleDecl::removeDuplicateImports() (as ImportedModule::removeDuplicates())
* SourceFile::ImportFlags
* SourceFile::ImportOptions
* SourceFile::ImportedModuleDesc
This commit is large and intentionally kept mechanical—nothing interesting to see here.
This makes it easier to specify OptionSet arguments.
Also modify appropriate uses of ModuleDecl::ImportFilter to take
advantage of the new constructor.
When completing a single argument for a trailing closure, pre-expand the
closure expression syntax instead of using a placeholder. It's not valid
to pass a non-closure anyway.
rdar://62189182
func foo() {}
let a: Int = #^HERE^#
Previously, we marked 'foo()' as 'NotRecommented' because 'Void' doesn't
have any member hence it cannot be 'Int'. But it wass confusing with
'deprecated'.
Now that we output 'typerelation' which is 'invalid' in this case. So clients
can deprioritize results, or even filter them out.
rdar://problem/57726512
Check whether the user has provided a valid
identifier when parsing the options. Also make
ImplicitImportModuleNames a private member of
FrontendOptions to prevent mutation after being
parsed.
When a “separately imported overlay” is added to a SourceFile, two things happen:
1. The direct import of the underlying module is removed from getImports*() by default. It is only visible if the caller passes ImportFilterKind:: ShadowedBySeparateOverlay. This means that non-module-scoped lookups will search _OverlayModule before searching its re-export UnderlyingModule, allowing it to shadow underlying declarations.
2. When you ask for lookupInModule() to look in the underlying module in that source file, it looks in the overlays instead. This means that UnderlyingModule.foo() can find declarations in _OverlayModule.
- Introduce ide::CompletionInstance to manage CompilerInstance
- `CompletionInstance` vends the cached CompilerInstance when:
-- The compiler arguments (i.e. CompilerInvocation) has has not changed
-- The primary file is the same
-- The completion happens inside function bodies in both previous and
current completion
-- The interface hash of the primary file has not changed
- Otherwise, it vends a fresh CompilerInstance and cache it for the next
completion
rdar://problem/20787086
This simplifies the code and prevents an assertion failure this code was
hitting computing the type relations between the result types and what it
determined as the expected type.
Resolves rdar://problem/53958454
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances in the swift repo.
Comparing "false" > "true" will return 0, which when returned by compare
indicates the two are equal which will result in a non deterministic
ordering of "false" and "true". Using .compare returns a negative number
as expected.
This is an attribute that gets put on an import in library FooKit to
keep it from being a requirement to import FooKit. It's not checked at
all, meaning that in this form it is up to the author of FooKit to
make sure nothing in its API or ABI depends on the implementation-only
dependency. There's also no debugging support here (debugging FooKit
/should/ import the implementation-only dependency if it's present).
The goal is to get to a point where it /can/ be checked, i.e. FooKit
developers are prevented from writing code that would rely on FooKit's
implementation-only dependency being present when compiling clients of
FooKit. But right now it's not.
rdar://problem/48985979
...in preparation for me adding a third kind of import, making the
existing "All" kind a problem. NFC, except that I did rewrite the
ClangModuleUnit implementation of getImportedModules to be simpler!
Extend the support for single-expression closures to handle
single-expression functions of all kinds. This allows, e.g.
func foo() -> MyEnum { .<here> }
to complete members of `MyEnum`.
For now, the accessors have been underscored as `_read` and `_modify`.
I'll prepare an evolution proposal for this feature which should allow
us to remove the underscores or, y'know, rename them to `purple` and
`lettuce`.
`_read` accessors do not make any effort yet to avoid copying the
value being yielded. I'll work on it in follow-up patches.
Opaque accesses to properties and subscripts defined with `_modify`
accessors will use an inefficient `materializeForSet` pattern that
materializes the value to a temporary instead of accessing it in-place.
That will be fixed by migrating to `modify` over `materializeForSet`,
which is next up after the `read` optimizations.
SIL ownership verification doesn't pass yet for the test cases here
because of a general fault in SILGen where borrows can outlive their
borrowed value due to being cleaned up on the general cleanup stack
when the borrowed value is cleaned up on the formal-access stack.
Michael, Andy, and I discussed various ways to fix this, but it seems
clear to me that it's not in any way specific to coroutine accesses.
rdar://35399664
Calling '@objc optional func' requires '?' or '!' after its name. When
completing method calls for them, 'key.sourcetext' should have '?'
whereas 'key.name' shouldn't.
Note that we deliberately do not use optional type name for
'key.typename'. This is consistent with optional chain '?.<propertyName>'
behavior.
rdar://problem/37904574
For normal completions it behaves the same as PostfixExprBeginning, but
it provides a hook for clients to provide a custom completion for this
position. For example, you might want to a x ..< y snippet in this
position.
rdar://problem/29910383
The filter name isn't helpful if you want to make rules about specific
overloads - e.g. only show the [Int] subscript on Array.
rdar://problem/28920034
Replace `NameOfType foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)` with DRY version `auto foo = dyn_cast<NameOfType>(bar)`.
The DRY auto version is by far the dominant form already used in the repo, so this PR merely brings the exceptional cases (redundant repetition form) in line with the dominant form (auto form).
See the [C++ Core Guidelines](https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/CppCoreGuidelines.md#es11-use-auto-to-avoid-redundant-repetition-of-type-names) for a general discussion on why to use `auto` to avoid redundant repetition of type names.
The typedef `swift::Module` was a temporary solution that allowed
`swift::Module` to be renamed to `swift::ModuleDecl` without requiring
every single callsite to be modified.
Modify all the callsites, and get rid of the typedef.
This adds a narrow special case in code-completion for control-flow-like
methods such as DispatchQueue().sync that are () -> (), to add a new
completion where the trailing closure is immediately expanded rather
than having to invoke placeholder expansion as a second step.
rdar://problem/26628804
... and don't try to filter the extended results. Once the results are
extended with the common prefix they will not match identifier filter
rules, which will create differences between completions depending on
whether they had a filter text or were a postfix expression. Also,
allow filtering by name directly on the inner operator name for inner
operators.
rdar://problem/26312235
Ideally we would have precise completion for all our keywords; for now,
just imporove handling of 'return', which we can do by checking if the
current context is a function/closure/init/subscript/etc.
rdar://problem/26307555
The filter name of a function should match the spelling of the function
name according to the language except that we don't insert _ for unnamed
parameters because underscores are legal inside identifiers and we don't
want to introduce spurious matches (also, we keep the () on a
parameterless function for disambiguation).
rdar://problem/26118915
In the new code-completion code path, force any known operators to go
through a fixed sort order. To identify operators unambiguously, add a
new BuiltinOperator code-completion kind to handle non-decl operators
(!, ., ?., and =).
rdar://problem/25994246
rdar://problem/23440367
