It might be unexpected to future users that `-swift-compiler-version`
would produce a version aligned to .swiftinterface instead of one used
to build the .swiftmodule file. To avoid this possible confusion, let's
scope down the version to `-interface-compiler-version` flag and
`SWIFT_INTERFACE_COMPILER_VERSION` option in the module.
Add function to handle all macro dependencies kinds in the scanner,
including taking care of the macro definitions in the module interface
for its client to use. The change involves:
* Encode the macro definition inside the binary module
* Resolve macro modules in the dependencies scanners, including those
declared inside the dependency modules.
* Propagate the macro defined from the direct dependencies to track
all the potentially available modules inside a module compilation.
This makes sure that Swift respects `-Xcc -stdlib=libc++` flags.
Clang already has existing logic to discover the system-wide libc++ installation on Linux. We rely on that logic here.
Importing a Swift module that was built with a different C++ stdlib is not supported and emits an error.
The Cxx module can be imported when compiling with any C++ stdlib. The synthesized conformances, e.g. to CxxRandomAccessCollection also work. However, CxxStdlib currently cannot be imported when compiling with libc++, since on Linux it refers to symbols from libstdc++ which have different mangled names in libc++.
rdar://118357548 / https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/issues/69825
This patch allows controlling the automatic import of private dependencies
separately from the DebuggerSupport option, which currently also triggers this
behavior. With explicit modules + precise compiler invocations LLDB is moving
towards no longer needing this behavior.
rdar://133088201
(cherry picked from commit a1ba7159e3)
When the dependency scanner picks a pre-built binary module candidate for a given dependency, it needs to be able to attempt to resolve its cross-import overlays relative to the textual interface that the binary module was built from. For example, if a collection of binary modules are located in, and resolved as dependencies from, a pre-built module directory, the scanner must lookup their corresponding cross-import overlays relative to the defining interface as read out from the binary module's MODULE_INTERFACE_PATH. https://github.com/swiftlang/swift/pull/70817 ensures that binary modules serialize the path to their defining textual interface.
Resolves rdar://130778577
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
SILOptions::EnableSerializePackage info is lost.
SILVerifier needs this info to determine whether resilience
can be bypassed for decls serialized in a resiliently
built module when Package CMO optimization enabled.
This PR adds SerializePackageEnabled bit to Module format
and uses that in SILVerifier.
Resolves rdar://126157356
LLVM is presumably moving towards `std::string_view` -
`StringRef::startswith` is deprecated on tip. `SmallString::startswith`
was just renamed there (maybe with some small deprecation inbetween, but
if so, we've missed it).
The `SmallString::startswith` references were moved to
`.str().starts_with()`, rather than adding the `starts_with` on
`stable/20230725` as we only had a few of them. Open to switching that
over if anyone feels strongly though.
we only check if the loaded module is built from a package interface. This is
not enough as a binary module could just contain exportable decls if built with
experimental-skip-non-exportable-decls, essentially resulting in content equivalent
to interface content. This might be made a default behavior so this PR requires
a module to opt in to allow non-resilient access by a participating client in the
same package.
Since it affects module format, SWIFTMODULE_VERSION_MINOR is updated.
rdar://123651270
There are scenarios where different compilers are distributed with
compatible serialization format versions and the same tag. Distinguish
swiftmodules in such a case by assigning them to different distribution
channels. A compiler expecting a specific channel will only read
swiftmodules from the same channel. The channels should be defined by
downstream code as it is by definition vendor specific.
For development, a no-channel compiler loads or defining the env var
SWIFT_IGNORE_SWIFTMODULE_REVISION skips this new check.
rdar://123731777
When a NoncopyableGenericsMismatch happens between the compiler and
stdlib, allow the compiler to rebuild the stdlib from its interface
instead of exiting with an error.
A swiftmodule can only be correctly ingested by a compiler
that has a matching state of using or not-using
NoncopyableGenerics.
The reason for this is fundamental: the absence of a Copyable
conformance in the swiftmodule indicates that a type is
noncopyable. Thus, if a compiler with NoncopyableGenerics
reads a swiftmodule that was not compiled with that feature,
it will think every type in that module is noncopyable.
Similarly, if a compiler with NoncopyableGenerics produces a
swiftmodule, there will be Copyable requirements on each
generic parameter that the compiler without the feature will
become confused about.
The solution here is to trigger a module mismatch, so that
the compiler re-generates the swiftmodule file using the
swiftinterface, which has been kept compatible with the compiler
regardless of whether the feature is enabled.
This reverts commit 3cc2831608.
The compiler's revision check has been relaxed since the feature was introduced
and so it's nos better to reduce the number of special code paths for LLDB in
the compiler to facilitate reasoning about it.
rdar://117824367
From being a scattered collection of 'static' methods in ScanDependencies.cpp
and member methods of ASTContext. This makes 'ScanDependencies.cpp' much easier
to read, and abstracts the actual scanning logic away to a place with common
state which will make it easier to reason about in the future.
- Add a flag to the serialized module (IsEmbeddedSwiftModule)
- Check on import that the mode matches (don't allow importing non-embedded module in embedded mode and vice versa)
- Drop TBD support, it's not expected to work in embedded Swift for now
- Drop auto-linking backdeploy libraries, it's not expected to backdeploy embedded Swift for now
- Drop prespecializations, not expected to work in embedded Swift for now
- Use CMO to serialize everything when emitting an embedded Swift module
- Change SILLinker to deserialize/import everything when importing an embedded Swift module
- Add an IR test for importing modules
- Add a deserialization validation test
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
Implementation-only dependencies may be referenced from internal decls.
When that module is imported as @testable, clients see the internal
decls and may fail accessing them if the transitive implementation-only
dependencies are not loaded.
Let's consider such transtive implementation-only dependencies as
optional for @testable imports. As such, the compiler will attempt to
load them for test targets, and won't fail if the dependency is missing.
We can make these dependencies required for non-public imports, but it
could be project breaking to do so for implementation-only dependencies.
Considering them as optional is a decent compromise.
rdar://79459263
A @testable import allows a client to call internal decls which may
refer to non-public dependencies. To support such a use case, load
non-public transitive dependencies of a module when it's imported
@testable from the main module.
This replaces the previous behavior where we loaded those dependencies
for any modules built for testing. This was risky as we would load more
module for any debug build, opening the door to a different behavior
between debug and release builds. In contrast, applying this logic to
@testable clients will only change the behavior of test targets.
rdar://107329303
Differentiate `internal` and `fileprivate` imports from
implementation-only imports at the module-wide level to offer a
different module loading strategy. The main difference is for non-public
imports from a module with testing enabled to be loaded by transitive
clients.
Ideally, we would only load transitive non-public dependencies on
testable imports of the middle module. The current module loading logic
doesn't allow for this behavior easily as a module may be first loaded
for a normal import and extra dependencies would have to be loaded on
later imports. We may want to refactor the module loading logic to allow
this if needed.
rdar://106514965
Realign the module loading behavior with the one of the package
access-level. If the package name is an empty string, don't accept other
modules with an empty package name as being part of the same module and
don't load package dependencies in such a case.
The previous behavior kept going even after we reported an invalid
swiftmodule. As such it ended up losing the precise invalid reason and
returned Malformed later on.
Weaken the precise tag check at loading swiftmodule to accept binary
modules build by a compiler with a tag where only the last digit is
different. We assume that the other digit in the version should ensure
compiler and stdlib compatibility. If the last digit doesn't match,
still raise a remark.
rdar://105158258
