The reason why is that we want to distinguish inbetween SILFunction's that are
marked as unspecified by SILGen and those that are parsed from textual SIL that
do not have any specified isolation. This will make it easier to write nice
FileCheck tests against SILGen output on what is the inferred isolation for
various items.
NFCI.
This fixes the debugger's ability to perform expression evaluation when debugging an
executable that was built with both under the following circumstances:
1. explicit module build
2. `-application-extension`
The fix is to include `-fapplication-extension` as an XCC field in the swiftmodule.
This primes the debugger's ClangImporter with the correct flag needed to load the
explicitly built pcm files generated at build time.
Mangling this information for future directions like component lifetimes
becomes complex and the current mangling scheme isn't scalable anyway.
Deleting this support for now.
In #69257, we modified `ObjCReason` to carry a pointer to the @implementation attribute for the `MemberOfObjCImplementationExtension` kind. This made it mark the @implementation attribute as invalid, suppressing diagnostics from the ObjCImplementationChecker.
However, invalidating the attribute *also* causes it to be skipped by serialization. That isn’t a problem if the diagnostics are errors, since we’ll never emit the serialized module, but #74135 softened these diagnostics to warnings for early adopters.
The upshot was that if Swift emitted one of these warnings when it compiled a library, clients of that library would see the objcImpl extension as a normal extension instead. This would cause various kinds of mischief: ambiguous name lookups because implementations weren’t being excluded, overrides failing because an implementation was `public` instead of `open`, asserts and crashes in SILGen and IRGen because stored properties were found in seemingly normal extensions, etc.
Fix this by setting a separate bit on ObjCImplementationAttr, rather than the invalid bit, and modifying the implementation checker to manually suppress many diagnostics when that bit is set.
Fixes rdar://134730183.
10.50 was once greater than any real macOS version, but now it compares
less than real released versions, which makes these tests depend on the
deployment target unnecessarily. Update these tests to use even larger
numbers to hopefully keep them independent a little longer.
This diagnostic reports when two compilers that are marked as targetting
different distribution channels try to read swiftmodules produced by the
other one. For a resilient module, this error is usually silently ignored
as the reader compiler picks the swiftinterface over the swiftmodule.
It is visibile to the end user when the module is non-resilient.
For such a case, we here try to improve the diagnostic to be more
meaningful.
The new diagnostics looks like so:
```
import ChannelLib // error: the binary module for 'ChannelLib' was compiled
// for 'restricted-channel', it cannot be imported by the
// current compiler which is aligned with 'other-channel'.
// Binary module loaded from path: .../ChannelLib.swiftmodule
```
Vendors should be mindful to pick meaningful channel names
to guide users in the direction of the actual solution.
Some editors use diagnostics from SourceKit to replace build issues. This causes issues if the diagnostics from SourceKit are formatted differently than the build issues. Make sure they are rendered the same way, removing most uses of `DiagnosticsEditorMode`.
To do so, always emit the `add stubs for conformance` note (which previously was only emitted in editor mode) and remove all `; add <something>` suffixes from notes that state which requirements are missing.
rdar://129283608
With `-experimental-lazy-typecheck` specified during module interface emission,
`collectProtocols()` may be the first piece of code to request the extended
type for a given extension and it therefore needs to ignore invalid extensions
and ensure that diagnostics are emitted.
Also, add some `PrettyStackTrace` coverage to `ModuleInterfaceSupport.cpp` to make
investigating future issues easier.
Resolves rdar://126232836.
It is no longer necessary to produce `.swiftinterface` files the support older
compilers that lack support for the NoncopyableGenerics feature. Cleaning this
up makes the stdlib `.swiftinterface` far more readable.
Centralize the exportability checking logic for nested functions in the
`DeclExportabilityVisitor` utility. This logic was previously added to SILGen
but there should not be special casing for nested functions at that layer.
Out of an abundance of caution, we:
1. Left in parsing support for transferring but internally made it rely on the
internals of sending.
2. Added a warning to tell people that transferring was going to
be removed very soon.
Now that we have given people some time, remove support for parsing
transferring.
rdar://130253724
If the extension adds conformance to an invertible protocol, it's
confusing for people to also infer conditional requirements on the
generic parameters for those invertible protocols. This came up in the
review of SE-427.
Removing the old, ad-hoc diagnostics code improves the diagnostics we
emit, since the existing diagnostics for missing conformances is already
pretty good.
rdar://127369509
TLDR: This makes it so that we always can parse sending/transferring but changes
the semantic language effects to be keyed on RegionBasedIsolation instead.
----
The key thing that makes this all work is that I changed all of the "special"
semantic changes originally triggered on *ArgsAndResults to now be triggered
based on RegionBasedIsolation being enabled. This makes a lot of sense since we
want these semantic changes specifically to be combined with the checkers that
RegionBasedIsolation turns on. As a result, even though this causes these two
features to always be enabled, we just parse it but we do not use it for
anything semantically.
rdar://128961672
We want to ensure that functions/methods themselves do not have sending mangled
into their names, but we do want sending mangled in non-top level positions. For
example: we do not want to mangle sending into a function like the following:
```swift
// We don't want to mangle this.
func test(_ x: sending NonSendableKlass) -> ()
```
But when it comes to actually storing functions into memory, we do want to
distinguish in between function values that use sending vs those that do not
since we do not want to allow for them to alias. Thus we want to mangle sending
into things like the following:
```swift
// We want to distinguish in between Array<(sending T) -> ()> and
// Array((T) -> ()>
let a = Array<(sending T) -> ()>
// We want to distinguish in between a global contianing (sending T) -> () and a
// global containing (T) -> ().
var global: (sending T) -> ()
```
This commit achieves that by making changes to the ASTMangler in getDeclType
which causes getDeclType to set a flag that says that we have not yet recursed
through the system and thus should suppress the printing of sendable. Once we
get further into the system and recurse, that flag is by default set to true, so
we get the old sending parameter without having to update large amounts of code.
rdar://127383107
The `-experimental-skip-all-function-bodies` flag is specified when producing
modules for indexing. These modules are not used for compilation, so it should
be safe to allow `-experimental-lazy-typecheck` and
`-experimental-skip-non-exportable-decls` as well without
`-enable-library-evolution`.
Resolves rdar://128706306
Allow lifetime depenendence on types that are BitwiseCopyable & Escapable.
This is unsafe in the sense that the compiler will not diagnose any use of the
dependent value outside of the lexcial scope of the source value. But, in
practice, dependence on an UnsafePointer is often needed. In that case, the
programmer should have already taken responsibility for ensuring the lifetime of the
pointer over all dependent uses. Typically, an unsafe pointer is valid for the
duration of a closure. Lifetime dependence prevents the dependent value from
being returned by the closure, so common usage is safe by default.
Typical example:
func decode(_ bufferRef: Span<Int>) { /*...*/ }
extension UnsafeBufferPointer {
// The client must ensure the lifetime of the buffer across the invocation of `body`.
// The client must ensure that no code modifies the buffer during the invocation of `body`.
func withUnsafeSpan<Result>(_ body: (Span<Element>) throws -> Result) rethrows -> Result {
// Construct Span using its internal, unsafe API.
try body(Span(unsafePointer: baseAddress!, count: count))
}
}
func decodeArrayAsUBP(array: [Int]) {
array.withUnsafeBufferPointer { buffer in
buffer.withUnsafeSpan {
decode($0)
}
}
}
In the future, we may add SILGen support for tracking the lexical scope of
BitwiseCopyable values. That would allow them to have the same dependence
behavior as other source values.
