Its functionality has been superseded by `@_spiOnly import`. There are no
longer any known clients and the flag was already unsupported in Swift 6, so
the functionality is now removed (but the flag is only deprecated for Swift 5).
Resolves rdar://136867210.
When the frontend option `-abi-comments-in-module-interface` is provided
during interface printing, the printed interface will contain
additional comments that provide the mangled names for public symbols.
This is an experiment in seeing how much information we can
meaningfully extract from a printed Swift interface for the purpose of
bridging with other languages.
Skip aliasing Foundation when `-alias-module-names-in-module-interface` is
specified since it appears to confuse the typechecker. The module name
"Foundation" is hardcoded and checked in several places, so aliasing Foundation
may be changing some subtle behaviors.
Resolves rdar://128897610.
In anticipation of adding a new kind of missing import record to `SourceFile`,
clarify the purpose of the existing "missing imports" record with more specific
naming and documentation.
This warning is designed to be an early report of name conflicts in
swiftinterfaces caused by a type having the same name as a module.
Make sure we silence this warning when the workaround
-alias-module-names-in-module-interface is enabled. This is what we
already do for -module-interface-preserve-types-as-written.
rdar://132990400
With `-experimental-lazy-typecheck` specified during module interface emission,
`collectProtocols()` may be the first piece of code to request the extended
type for a given extension and it therefore needs to ignore invalid extensions
and ensure that diagnostics are emitted.
Also, add some `PrettyStackTrace` coverage to `ModuleInterfaceSupport.cpp` to make
investigating future issues easier.
Resolves rdar://126232836.
There are two axes on which a saved frontend flag can be categorized for
printing in a `.swiftinterface` file:
1. Whether the flag is "ignorable" or not.
2. Which levels of interface the flag should be in (public, package).
This refactor ensures that those two axes are modeled independently and
prepares the infrastructure to allow flags to appear in the private and package
interfaces without being included in the public interface.
Having package-name flag in non-package interfaces causes them to be built as if
belonging to a package, which causes an issue for a loading client outside of the
package as follows.
For example, when building X that depends on A with the following dependency chain:
X --> A --> B --(package-only)--> C
1. X itself is not in the same package as A, B, and C.
2. When dependency scanning X, and opening up B, because the scan target is in a
different package domain, the scanner decides that B's package-only dependency
on C is to be ignored.
3. When then finally building A itself, it will load its dependencies, but because
the .private.swiftinterface of A still specifies -package-name, when it loads
B, it will then examine its dependencies and deem that this package-only dependency
on C is required.
Because (2) and (3) disagree, we get an error now when building the private A textual interface.
rdar://130701866
In some cases this import may be superfluous as it's also
`@_exported` imported by the overlay. However, when the overlay
is hidden and the import not printed, the import can go entierly
missing.
Although I don't plan to bring over new assertions wholesale
into the current qualification branch, it's entirely possible
that various minor changes in main will use the new assertions;
having this basic support in the release branch will simplify that.
(This is why I'm adding the includes as a separate pass from
rewriting the individual assertions)
We can't simply emit the desugared, expanded version of the requirements
because there's no way to pretty-print the type `some ~Copyable` when
the `~Copyable`'s get replaced with the absence of `Copyable`. We'd be
left with just `some _` or need to invent a new top type so we can write
`some Top`. Thus, it's best to simply reverse the expansion of default
requirements when emitting a swiftinterface file.
Add a new flag to enable package interface loading.
Use the last value of package-name in case of dupes.
Rename PrintInterfaceContentMode as InterfaceMode.
Update diagnostics.
Test package interface loading with various scenarios.
Test duplicate package-name.
It has an extension .package.swiftinterface and contains package decls
as well as SPIs and public/inlinable decls. When a module is loaded
from interface, it now looks up the package-name in the interface
and checks if the importer is in the same package. If so, it uses
that package interface found to load the module. If not, uses the existing
logic to load modules.
Resolves rdar://104617854
Use the same pattern as 'getAllMembers()'. This supports nested macro
expansion:
```
std::function<void(Decl *)> visit;
visit = [&](Decl *d) {
doIt(d);
d->visitAuxiliaryDecls(visit);
};
for (auto *d : decls)
visit(d);
```
Don't visit auxiliary decls in `PrintAST::visit(Decl *)` this function
is only intended for single decl printing. The caller should visit them
separately. For that, add
`ModuleDecl::getTopLevelDeclsWithAuxiliaryDecls()`
Always print the real module name for references in private
swiftinterfaces, ignoring export-as declarations. Keep using the
export-as name for the public swiftinterface only.
The flag `ModuleInterfaceExportAs` used to enable this behavior and
we're removing it to make it the default.
rdar://115922907
The feature InternalImportsByDefault makes imports default to internal instead
of public. Applying the Swift 6 behavior of SE-0409 in Swift 5.
Let's use only that flag to track the Swift 6 behavior as well instead
of separately checking for the language version.
If the access-level on imports proposal is accepted as written, all
imports printed in swiftinterfaces will be `public`. Whether or not we
require the explicit `public` keyword in Swift 6 mode, printing it will
have no downside. It also goes along with the mentality that
swiftinterfaces should be more explicit than implicit.
rdar://115455383
Previously, unsatisfiable conformances could be omitted from emitted
`.swiftinterface` files in lazy typechecking mode since inherited types might
be unresolved when gathering the conformances.
Adding these test cases also revealed that serialization restrictions needed to
be relaxed in order to accomodate unsatisfiable conformances.
Previously, indirect public conformances provided by conforming to an internal
protocol could be skipped in a `.swiftinterface` in lazy typechecking mode
since inherited types might not be resolved before collecting the indirect
conformances.
Wrap the `InheritedEntry` array available on both `ExtensionDecl` and
`TypeDecl` in a new `InheritedTypes` class. This class will provide shared
conveniences for working with inherited type clauses. NFC.
Reformatting everything now that we have `llvm` namespaces. I've
separated this from the main commit to help manage merge-conflicts and
for making it a bit easier to read the mega-patch.
This is phase-1 of switching from llvm::Optional to std::optional in the
next rebranch. llvm::Optional was removed from upstream LLVM, so we need
to migrate off rather soon. On Darwin, std::optional, and llvm::Optional
have the same layout, so we don't need to be as concerned about ABI
beyond the name mangling. `llvm::Optional` is only returned from one
function in
```
getStandardTypeSubst(StringRef TypeName,
bool allowConcurrencyManglings);
```
It's the return value, so it should not impact the mangling of the
function, and the layout is the same as `std::optional`, so it should be
mostly okay. This function doesn't appear to have users, and the ABI was
already broken 2 years ago for concurrency and no one seemed to notice
so this should be "okay".
I'm doing the migration incrementally so that folks working on main can
cherry-pick back to the release/5.9 branch. Once 5.9 is done and locked
away, then we can go through and finish the replacement. Since `None`
and `Optional` show up in contexts where they are not `llvm::None` and
`llvm::Optional`, I'm preparing the work now by going through and
removing the namespace unwrapping and making the `llvm` namespace
explicit. This should make it fairly mechanical to go through and
replace llvm::Optional with std::optional, and llvm::None with
std::nullopt. It's also a change that can be brought onto the
release/5.9 with minimal impact. This should be an NFC change.
This source location will be used to determine whether to add a name lookup
option to exclude macro expansions when the name lookup request is constructed.
Currently, the source location argument is unused.
When performing an implicit module build, the frontend was prepending
`-target-min-inlining-target target` to the command line. This was overriding
the implicit `-target-min-inlining-target min` argument that is implied when
`-library-level api` is specified. As a result, the wrong overload could be
picked when compiling the body of an inlinable function to SIL for emission
into the client, potentially resulting in crashes when the client of the module
is back deployed to an older OS.
Resolves rdar://109336472
This attribute was commented out in the private swiftinterface for
backwards compatibility with older compilers unaware of the attribute.
This scenario shouldn't be a problem anymore and without that attribute
some imports can raise errors. Let's print the attribute as it was
written in the sources without commenting it out.
