The general policy has been that even if something crashes at run
time, we don't make it a hard error in Swift 4 mode (or Swift 3 mode!)
if it wasn't a hard error in Swift 4.0 (3.0). In this case, we thought
we could get away with it, and then it turns out it actually caused
some problems. (And as 2bc010681 shows, we can still make mistakes.)
This change isn't perfect because the diagnostic appears in /clients/
rather than in the module that's being compiled as Swift 4 (instead of
Swift 5). But it still means that someone who hasn't changed
/anything/ from a valid Swift 4.0 project will be able to compile
without any changes, even if they were relying on being able to call
+new when -init was unavailable for some reason.
More rdar://problem/35942058
Follow-up to 49c65facc9 to account for subclasses. An unavailable
-init makes +new unavailable, but reintroducing it in a subclass
should reintroduce +new if the root class is NSObject (where +new is
implemented).
rdar://problem/35914080
Currently a loop-hole exists by which one could end up invoking an unavailable -init initializer from Obj-C
when it is unavailable by using +new (which itself calls -init)
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-5018
For historic reasons, Clang's representation of an Objective-C class
declaration ObjCInterfaceDecl) and compatibility alias
(ObjCCompatibleAliasDecl) are not actually Clang TypeDecl nodes. Cope
with this in Objective-C printing, fixing rdar://problem/32308192.
Initializers that don't look like init methods to ARC need to have
`SWIFT_METHOD_FAMILY(init)`.
Also tighten up the check for init-like methods to not consider e.g.
`initializeFoo` to be an init-like method.
I'm not sure why this didn't occur to me in 8282160d: of course if you
see a generic type with arguments, you need to see the @interface for
that type in order to supply the arguments. Maybe I was thinking the
generated interface would automatically import anything the module
itself imports, but that hasn't ever been true.
rdar://problem/28738008
From the Swift documentation:
"If you define an optional variable without providing a default value,
the variable is automatically set to nil for you."
More specifically, don't try to emit a definition for them. Just fall
through to what we do for forward-declarations...which also needed some
fixing, to make sure we don't use a Swift typealias as its underlying
type but never import the underlying type.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-2352
* [ClangImporter] Remove importer-based NS stripping.
As Tony puts it, in the end we wound up with more Foundation
declarations imported as members or keeping "NS" than those that
dropped it, and any further decisions will be made on a case-by-case
basis. Move all of the existing cases of prefix-stripping into
Foundation's API notes and drop the logic from the compiler.
Tested by dumping the generated interface for Foundation and its
submodules for both macOS and the iOS simulator, and comparing the
results. A few cases did slip through here because of the interaction
between "SwiftName" and "Availability: nonswift".
The next commit will re-add "NS" to some stragglers that we missed.
rdar://problem/26880017
* APINotes: Add "NS" back to a few types.
NSKeyedUnarchiverDelegate
NSKeyedArchiverDelegate
NSTextCheckingTypes
NSBinarySearchingOptions
NSEnumerationOptions
NSSortOptions
More rdar://problem/26880017
* Remove now-redundant SwiftNames from API notes.
No change observed in the generated interface of Foundation and its
submodules.
Finishes rdar://problem/26880017.
* [PrintAsObjC] Add unavailable attribute to non-inherited initializers
Initializers that aren't inherited by subclasses cannot be called, so we
should make this visible to Obj-C.
Due to SR-2211, non-inherited convenience initializers do not get this
same treatment.
* [PrintAsObjC] Add unavailable initializers for private overrides
When a public initializer is overridden with a private one, we need to
mark these as unavailable to Obj-C as they're not supposed to be
callable even though they do exist.
* Migrate from `UnsafePointer<Void>` to `UnsafeRawPointer`.
As proposed in SE-0107: UnsafeRawPointer.
`void*` imports as `UnsafeMutableRawPointer`.
`const void*` imports as `UnsafeRawPointer`.
Occurrences of `UnsafePointer<Void>` are replaced with UnsafeRawPointer.
* Migrate overlays from UnsafePointer<Void> to UnsafeRawPointer.
This requires explicit memory binding in several places,
particularly in NSData and CoreAudio.
* Fix a bunch of test cases for Void->Raw migration.
* qsort takes IUO values
* Bridge `Unsafe[Mutable]RawPointer as `void [const] *`.
* Parse #dsohandle as UnsafeMutableRawPointer
* Update a bunch of test cases for Void->Raw migration.
* Trivial fix for the SceneKit test case.
* Add an UnsafeRawPointer self initializer.
This is unfortunately necessary for assignment between types imported from C.
* Tiny simplification of the initializer.
* Migrate from `UnsafePointer<Void>` to `UnsafeRawPointer`.
As proposed in SE-0107: UnsafeRawPointer.
`void*` imports as `UnsafeMutableRawPointer`.
`const void*` imports as `UnsafeRawPointer`.
Occurrences of `UnsafePointer<Void>` are replaced with UnsafeRawPointer.
* Migrate overlays from UnsafePointer<Void> to UnsafeRawPointer.
This requires explicit memory binding in several places,
particularly in NSData and CoreAudio.
* Fix a bunch of test cases for Void->Raw migration.
* qsort takes IUO values
* Bridge `Unsafe[Mutable]RawPointer as `void [const] *`.
* Parse #dsohandle as UnsafeMutableRawPointer
* Update a bunch of test cases for Void->Raw migration.
* Trivial fix for the SceneKit test case.
* Add an UnsafeRawPointer self initializer.
This is unfortunately necessary for assignment between types imported from C.
* Tiny simplification of the initializer.
It sounds good on paper, but in practice we ended up breaking Core Data
projects (because people name their boolean properties 'isFoo' rather
than the Objective-C 'foo'), forcing an Objective-C-side change when
a mixed-source project upgrades to Swift 3, and causing collisions when
there are properties named both 'foo' and 'isFoo'. If people care about
their Swift boolean properties strictly following the Objective-C Cocoa
naming conventions, they'll have to specify them manually.
(We do have a bug to make it easier to rename the getter of a stored
property exposed to Objective-C: rdar://problem/21261564.)
This reverts commit 6fe6266c99.
rdar://problem/26847223
Swift has supported this for a long time using manual casts and going
from Swift to Objective-C; just enable it now for the importer.
rdar://problem/15101588
Bridged value types are implicitly copied as part of bridging.
This isn't 100% correct because it doesn't handle bridged types
that /don't/ conform to NSCopying, but there aren't any of those
today and there probably shouldn't be.
rdar://problem/26917017
public static var myDictionary: [String: AnyObject]
becomes
SWIFT_CLASS_PROPERTY(@property (nonatomic, class, readonly, copy)
NSDictionary<NSString *, id> * _Nonnull myDictionary;)
and the commas in the ObjC generic break the macro, just like they do with
C++ templates. Fix this by making the macro variadic.
rdar://problem/26879147
Under ARC, methods in the "init" family are considered to have
NS_REPLACES_RECEIVER semantics ("consumes" self and returning a
value at +1). This is correct for Objective-C "init methods",
which are equivalent for Swift's initializers, but almost never
correct for any other methods that happen to start with the word
"init".
Note that Swift still follows all the other ARC conventions, so
if you name a method or property, say, "newItemController", the
value will be returned at +1. For methods this is probably
desirable, but for properties maybe not. We could do something
similar for property accessors to make sure they always have
the default "no method family" semantics in Objective-C.
rdar://problem/25759260
There's not yet a released version of Apple Clang that supports
Objective-C class properties, so make sure the generated header
guards any uses of them with a __has_feature check, and provides
declarations of the accessor methods as well.
https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-1442
Though the generic type information isn't present, it isn't necessary if we're just invoking other operations from Objective-C. This should allow an extension to use the generic class's own API to some degree, as it would if defined on the nongeneric form.
Implements SE-0055: https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0055-optional-unsafe-pointers.md
- Add NULL as an extra inhabitant of Builtin.RawPointer (currently
hardcoded to 0 rather than being target-dependent).
- Import non-object pointers as Optional/IUO when nullable/null_unspecified
(like everything else).
- Change the type checker's *-to-pointer conversions to handle a layer of
optional.
- Use 'AutoreleasingUnsafeMutablePointer<NSError?>?' as the type of error
parameters exported to Objective-C.
- Drop NilLiteralConvertible conformance for all pointer types.
- Update the standard library and then all the tests.
I've decided to leave this commit only updating existing tests; any new
tests will come in the following commits. (That may mean some additional
implementation work to follow.)
The other major piece that's missing here is migration. I'm hoping we get
a lot of that with Swift 1.1's work for optional object references, but
I still need to investigate.
These tests explicitly disable the use of modules. However, the lit
configuration is such that the module cache path will be passed unconditionally
to the clang invocation. Squelch the unused option warning (error).
For the most part this was just "check isInstanceProperty"; the one feature not yet implemented
is the emission of ObjC metadata for class properties.
rdar://problem/16830785
