The preferred way to create a nil pointer is to use the 'nil' literal.
Affected types:
AutoreleasingUnsafeMutablePointer
OpaquePointer
UnsafeMutablePointer
UnsafePointer
Most of this is in updating the standard library, SDK overlays, and
piles of test cases to use the new names. No surprises here, although
this shows us some potential heuristic tweaks.
There is one substantive compiler change that needs to be factored out
involving synthesizing calls to copyWithZone()/copy(zone:). Aside from
that, there are four failing tests:
Swift :: ClangModules/objc_parse.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/Foundation_test.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/archiving_generic_swift_class.swift
Swift :: Interpreter/SDK/objc_currying.swift
due to two independent remaining compiler bugs:
* We're not getting partial ordering between NSCoder's
encode(AnyObject, forKey: String) and NSKeyedArchiver's version of
that method, and
* Dynamic lookup (into AnyObject) doesn't know how to find the new
names. We need the Swift name lookup tables enabled to address this.
Use the keywords `_Nullable`, `_Nonnull`, and `_Null_unspecified`
instead of the older compatibility forms `__nullable`, `__nonnull`, and
`__null_unspecified`.
Part of rdar://problem/23614638
All refutable patterns and function parameters marked with 'var'
is now an error.
- Using explicit 'let' keyword on function parameters causes a warning.
- Don't suggest making function parameters mutable
- Remove uses in the standard library
- Update tests
rdar://problem/23378003
...or rather, typealiases of AnyObject. They should be typealiases of
CFTypeRef. (The problem is that everywhere else CFFooRef becomes a typealias
for CFFoo, but we don't do the same with 'CFType'.)
Fixes a PrintAsObjC problem where we'd try to mark such typealiases as
'strong' if they show up in the generated ObjC header.
rdar://problem/22827172
Swift SVN r32230
The following declaration kinds can be marked with this attribute:
- method
- property
- property accessor
- subscript
- constructor
Use cases include resolving circularity for bridging methods in an @objc
class, and allowing overloading methods and constructors in an @objc class
by signature by marking some of them @nonobjc.
It is an error to override an @objc method with a @nonobjc method. The
converse, where we override a @nonobjc method with a @objc method, is
explicitly supported.
It is also an error to put a @nonobjc attribute on a method which is
inferred as @objc due to being part of an @objc protocol conformance.
Fixes <rdar://problem/16763754>.
Swift SVN r28126
(Note that this registry isn't fully enabled yet; it's built so that
we can test it, but has not yet taken over the primary task of
managing conformances from the existing system).
The conformance registry tracks all of the protocols to which a
particular nominal type conforms, including those for which
conformance was explicitly specified, implied by other explicit
conformances, inherited from a superclass, or synthesized by the
implementation.
The conformance registry is a lazily-built data structure designed for
multi-file support (which has been a problematic area for protocol
conformances). It allows one to query for the conformances of a type
to a particular protocol, enumerate all protocols to which a type
conforms, and enumerate all of the conformances that are associated
with a particular declaration context (important to eliminate
duplicated witness tables).
The conformance registry diagnoses conflicts and ambiguities among
different conformances of the same type to the same protocol. There
are three common cases where we'll see a diagnostic:
1) Redundant explicit conformance of a type to a protocol:
protocol P { }
struct X : P { }
extension X : P { } // error: redundant explicit conformance
2) Explicit conformance to a protocol that collides with an inherited
conformance:
protocol P { }
class Super : P { }
class Sub : Super, P { } // error: redundant explicit conformance
3) Ambiguous placement of an implied conformance:
protocol P1 { }
protocol P2 : P1 { }
protocol P3 : P1 { }
struct Y { }
extension Y : P2 { }
extension Y : P3 { } // error: ambiguous implied conformance to 'P1'
This happens when two different explicit conformances (here, P2 and
P3) placed on different declarations (e.g., two extensions, or the
original definition and other extension) both imply the same
conformance (P1), and neither of the explicit conformances imply
each other. We require the user to explicitly specify the ambiguous
conformance to break the ambiguity and associate the witness table
with a specific context.
Swift SVN r26067
This is required to correctly use the mock SDK when the SDK overlay is
built and tested separately. (Otherwise, the mock SDK might not get
used, because the overlay SDK options would expand from the
%-substitution, appear first on the command line, and shadow the mock
SDK in the search path).
Swift SVN r25185
Only create trivial accessors if the actual VarDecl is @objc,
explicitly or implicitly, not the class.
Also, replicate the PrintAsObjC test into classes_objc_generics since
"classes" isn't run on compilers that support Objective-C generics, and
fix the expectations.
Swift SVN r25162
Expose static stored properties in @objc classes as trivial class
methods.
static let i: T => +(T)i
static var i: T => +(T)i and +(void)setI:
static var k T { get set } => No change.
Fixes rdar://problem/19784053
Swift SVN r25152
For pointer types that Swift doesn't currently import using Optional
(see rdar://problem/15189170 and its dups), use __null_unspecified.
rdar://problem/19775335
Swift SVN r25144
Previously, when dealing with CF typedefs of other CF types, we would strip
off the "Ref" suffix...and then leave it off when it came time to print the
Objective-C header.
rdar://problem/19446942
Swift SVN r24562
Most tests were using %swift or similar substitutions, which did not
include the target triple and SDK. The driver was defaulting to the
host OS. Thus, we could not run the tests when the standard library was
not built for OS X.
Swift SVN r24504
Doing so is safe even though we have mock SDK. The include paths for
modules with the same name in the real and mock SDKs are different, and
the module files will be distinct (because they will have a different
hash).
This reduces test runtime on OS X by 30% and brings it under a minute on
a 16-core machine.
This also uncovered some problems with some tests -- even when run for
iOS configurations, some tests would still run with macosx triple. I
fixed the tests where I noticed this issue.
rdar://problem/19125022
Swift SVN r23683
If enums are used as parameters or returns of @objc methods, we may need to forward declare those enums when printing the class @interface.
Swift SVN r23445
This reduces the chances of conflict among inner class names. It's too easy
for a class to be implicitly marked @objc in Swift.
To make this work, correctly preserve the implicitness of @objc through
serialization. (We were probably intending to do this all along, since we
were serializing the flag but not doing anything with it at the other end.)
Swift SVN r21678
There are still problems with nested classes:
- They're much more likely to have colliding compile-time names
(since the outer class's name is dropped).
- They're only picked up if the outer class is also @objc.
But at least now we won't generate invalid Objective-C. Unless the inner
classes have the same name.
rdar://problem/18187877
Swift SVN r21677
To do this, we keep track of decls with superfluous typedefs (rather than
just the typedefs), and check for that. Tag decls without typedefs are
printed with the tag.
<rdar://problem/17569385>
Swift SVN r20221
weak => 'weak', unless the type is a CF type. I'm not sure weak references to
CF types work anyway, but until we have that cleared up this works.
unowned => 'assign'. In Objective-C, use of 'assign' for object properties is
largely deprecated in favor of 'unsafe_unretained', but unowned
properties behave more like a 'safe_unretained'. Since they don't
auto-update like 'weak', though, this should hint to clients to
be careful about lifetimes.
unowned(unsafe) => 'unsafe_unretained'
As before, Arrays, Dictionaries, and Strings are considered 'copy' properties;
blocks are now considered 'copy' properties as well.
All other types get their (implied) default: 'strong' for objects, 'assign'
for primitives.
<rdar://problem/17346846>
Swift SVN r20112
A while back we decided to require @IBOutlets to be optional (via ! or
?); we got as far as ripping out the implicit !'ification of
@IBOutlets, but never added the diagnostic. Diagnose this restriction
with Fix-Its.
Swift SVN r19981
Also, fix a bug where value properties weren't getting marked as "copy"
if wrapped in IUOs, and replace some identifier-based comparisons with
pointer comparisons against ASTContext-cached decls.
<rdar://problem/17007235>
Swift SVN r19874
The upshot of this is that internal decls in an app target will be in the
generated header but internal decls in a framework target will not. This
is important since the generated header is part of a framework's public
interface. Users always have the option to add members via category to an
internal framework type they need to use from Objective-C, or to write the
@interface themselves if the entire type is missing. Only internal protocols
are left out by this.
The presence of the bridging header isn't a /perfect/ way to decide this,
but it's close enough. In an app target without a bridging header, it's
unlikely that there will be ObjC sources depending on the generated header.
Swift SVN r19763
You can still mark them @objc explicitly (or @IBOutlet, or anything else that
would require ObjC interop).
Also, don't print private decls in the generated header, whether @objc or not.
not.
Swift SVN r19733
