In #69257, we modified `ObjCReason` to carry a pointer to the @implementation attribute for the `MemberOfObjCImplementationExtension` kind. This made it mark the @implementation attribute as invalid, suppressing diagnostics from the ObjCImplementationChecker.
However, invalidating the attribute *also* causes it to be skipped by serialization. That isn’t a problem if the diagnostics are errors, since we’ll never emit the serialized module, but #74135 softened these diagnostics to warnings for early adopters.
The upshot was that if Swift emitted one of these warnings when it compiled a library, clients of that library would see the objcImpl extension as a normal extension instead. This would cause various kinds of mischief: ambiguous name lookups because implementations weren’t being excluded, overrides failing because an implementation was `public` instead of `open`, asserts and crashes in SILGen and IRGen because stored properties were found in seemingly normal extensions, etc.
Fix this by setting a separate bit on ObjCImplementationAttr, rather than the invalid bit, and modifying the implementation checker to manually suppress many diagnostics when that bit is set.
Fixes rdar://134730183.
10.50 was once greater than any real macOS version, but now it compares
less than real released versions, which makes these tests depend on the
deployment target unnecessarily. Update these tests to use even larger
numbers to hopefully keep them independent a little longer.
This diagnostic reports when two compilers that are marked as targetting
different distribution channels try to read swiftmodules produced by the
other one. For a resilient module, this error is usually silently ignored
as the reader compiler picks the swiftinterface over the swiftmodule.
It is visibile to the end user when the module is non-resilient.
For such a case, we here try to improve the diagnostic to be more
meaningful.
The new diagnostics looks like so:
```
import ChannelLib // error: the binary module for 'ChannelLib' was compiled
// for 'restricted-channel', it cannot be imported by the
// current compiler which is aligned with 'other-channel'.
// Binary module loaded from path: .../ChannelLib.swiftmodule
```
Vendors should be mindful to pick meaningful channel names
to guide users in the direction of the actual solution.
Some editors use diagnostics from SourceKit to replace build issues. This causes issues if the diagnostics from SourceKit are formatted differently than the build issues. Make sure they are rendered the same way, removing most uses of `DiagnosticsEditorMode`.
To do so, always emit the `add stubs for conformance` note (which previously was only emitted in editor mode) and remove all `; add <something>` suffixes from notes that state which requirements are missing.
rdar://129283608
With `-experimental-lazy-typecheck` specified during module interface emission,
`collectProtocols()` may be the first piece of code to request the extended
type for a given extension and it therefore needs to ignore invalid extensions
and ensure that diagnostics are emitted.
Also, add some `PrettyStackTrace` coverage to `ModuleInterfaceSupport.cpp` to make
investigating future issues easier.
Resolves rdar://126232836.
Conflicts:
- `test/Interop/Cxx/class/method/methods-this-and-indirect-return-irgen-itanium.swift`
previously fixed on rebranch, now fixed on main (slightly differently).
It is no longer necessary to produce `.swiftinterface` files the support older
compilers that lack support for the NoncopyableGenerics feature. Cleaning this
up makes the stdlib `.swiftinterface` far more readable.
Centralize the exportability checking logic for nested functions in the
`DeclExportabilityVisitor` utility. This logic was previously added to SILGen
but there should not be special casing for nested functions at that layer.
Out of an abundance of caution, we:
1. Left in parsing support for transferring but internally made it rely on the
internals of sending.
2. Added a warning to tell people that transferring was going to
be removed very soon.
Now that we have given people some time, remove support for parsing
transferring.
rdar://130253724
If the extension adds conformance to an invertible protocol, it's
confusing for people to also infer conditional requirements on the
generic parameters for those invertible protocols. This came up in the
review of SE-427.
Removing the old, ad-hoc diagnostics code improves the diagnostics we
emit, since the existing diagnostics for missing conformances is already
pretty good.
rdar://127369509
