Formal types are defined by the language's type system. SIL types are
lowered. They are no longer part of that type system.
The important distinction here is between the SIL storage type and the SIL value
type. To make this distinction clear, I refer to the SILFunctionTypes "formal"
conventions. These conventions dictate the SIL storage type but *not* the SIL
value type. I call them "formal" conventions because they are an immutable
characteristic of the function's type and made explicit via qualifiers on the
function type's parameters and results. This is in contrast to to SIL
conventions which depend on the SIL stage, and in the short term whether the
opaque values flag is enabled.
Separate formal lowered types from SIL types.
The SIL type of an argument will depend on the SIL module's conventions.
The module conventions are determined by the SIL stage and LangOpts.
Almost NFC, but specialized manglings are broken incidentally as a result of
fixes to the way passes handle book-keeping of aruments. The mangler is fixed in
the subsequent commit.
Otherwise, NFC is intended, but quite possible do to rewriting the logic in many
places.
Remove unused function as identified during a normal compilation:
swift/lib/SILOptimizer/Transforms/StackPromotion.cpp:303:15: warning: unused function 'operator!=' [-Wunused-function]
The reason why I am introducing special instructions is so I can maintain the
qualified ownership API wedge in between qualified SIL and the rest of the ARC
instructions that are pervasively used in the compiler.
These instructions in the future /could/ be extended to just take @sil_unmanaged
operands directly, but I want to maintain flexibility to take regular
non-trivial operands in the short term.
rdar://29791263
Separate collecting the applies and devirtualizing them into two loops.
We run into an issue on a huge test case where we end up devirtualizing a call-site over and over again.
I have not been able to reduce a test case.
rdar://29785529
Most of this involved sprinkling ValueOwnershipKind::Owned in many places. In
some of these places, I am sure I was too cavalier and I expect some of them to
be trivial. The verifier will help me to track those down.
On the other hand, I do expect there to be some places where we are willing to
accept guaranteed+trivial or owned+trivial. In those cases, I am going to
provide an aggregate ValueOwnershipKind that will then tell SILArgument that it
should disambiguate using the type. This will eliminate the ackwardness from
such code.
I am going to use a verifier to fix such cases.
This commit also begins the serialization of ValueOwnershipKind of arguments,
but does not implement parsing of value ownership kinds. That and undef are the
last places that we still use ValueOwnershipKind::Any.
rdar://29791263
This in the case of insertFunctionArgument requires a ValueOwnershipKind to be
specified since we use that for transformations of function argument lists that
are only correct after the transformation is complete. This only occurs in
FunctionSignatureOptimizations.
On the other hand, createFunctionArgument is only used to construct completely
new argument lists, so we can instead just rely on the function we are in rather
than require the user to pass it in.
rdar://29791263
The ASI->eraseFromParent() call after removeSingleBlockAllocation(ASI)
will assert if there are any remaining uses of the allocation ASI. This can
happen if there are any dead instructions for struct or tuple address
projections, since removeSingleBlockAllocation only removes the instructions
that are actually used by loads and stores. The existing stdlib/subString.swift
test exposes this issue when running check-swift-optimize.
rdar://problem/28671838
Not sure why but this was another "toxic utility method".
Most of the usages fell into one of three categories:
- The base value was always non-null, so we could just call
getCanonicalType() instead, making intent more explicit
- The result was being compared for equality, so we could
skip canonicalization and call isEqual() instead, removing
some boilerplate
- Utterly insane code that made no sense
There were only a couple of legitimate uses, and even there
open-coding the conditional null check made the code clearer.
Also while I'm at it, make the SIL open archetypes tracker
more typesafe by passing around ArchetypeType * instead of
Type and CanType.
This means using a struct so we can put methods on the struct and using an
anonymous enum to create namespaced values. Specifically:
struct SILArgumentConvention {
enum : uint8_t {
Indirect_In,
Indirect_In_Guaranteed,
Indirect_Inout,
Indirect_InoutAliasable,
Indirect_Out,
Direct_Owned,
Direct_Unowned,
Direct_Deallocating,
Direct_Guaranteed,
} Value;
SILArgumentConvention(decltype(Value) NewValue)
: Value(NewValue) {}
operator decltype(Value)() const {
return Value;
}
ParameterConvention getParameterConvention() const {
switch (Value) {
...
}
}
bool isIndirectConvention() const {
...
}
};
This allows for:
1. Avoiding abstraction leakage via the enum type. If someone wants to use
decltype as well, I think that is enough work that the leakage is acceptable.
2. Still refer to enum cases like we are working with an enum class
(e.g. SILArgumentConvention::Direct_Owned).
3. Avoid using the anonymous type in function arguments due to an implicit
conversion.
4. And most importantly... *drum roll* add methods to our enums!
We preserve the current behavior of assuming Any ownership always and use
default arguments to hide this change most of the time. There are asserts now in
the SILBasicBlock::{create,replace,insert}{PHI,Function}Argument to ensure that
the people can only create SILFunctionArguments in entry blocks and
SILPHIArguments in non-entry blocks. This will ensure that the code in tree
maintains the API distinction even if we are not using the full distinction in
between the two.
Once the verifier is finished being upstreamed, I am going to audit the
createPHIArgument cases for the proper ownership. This is b/c I will be able to
use the verifier to properly debug the code. At that point, I will also start
serializing/printing/parsing the ownershipkind of SILPHIArguments, but lets take
things one step at a time and move incrementally.
In the process, I also discovered a CSE bug. I am not sure how it ever worked.
Basically we replace an argument with a new argument type but return the uses of
the old argument to refer to the old argument instead of a new argument.
rdar://29671437
For a long time, we have:
1. Created methods on SILArgument that only work on either function arguments or
block arguments.
2. Created code paths in the compiler that only allow for "function"
SILArguments or "block" SILArguments.
This commit refactors SILArgument into two subclasses, SILPHIArgument and
SILFunctionArgument, separates the function and block APIs onto the subclasses
(leaving the common APIs on SILArgument). It also goes through and changes all
places in the compiler that conditionalize on one of the forms of SILArgument to
just use the relevant subclass. This is made easier by the relevant APIs not
being on SILArgument anymore. If you take a quick look through you will see that
the API now expresses a lot more of its intention.
The reason why I am performing this refactoring now is that SILFunctionArguments
have a ValueOwnershipKind defined by the given function's signature. On the
other hand, SILBlockArguments have a stored ValueOwnershipKind. Rather than
store ValueOwnershipKind in both instances and in the function case have a dead
variable, I decided to just bite the bullet and fix this.
rdar://29671437
Officially kick SILBoxType over to be "nominal" in its layout, with generic layouts structurally parameterized only by formal types. Change SIL to lower a capture to a nongeneric box when possible, or a box capturing the enclosing generic context when necessary.
Changes:
* Terminate all namespaces with the correct closing comment.
* Make sure argument names in comments match the corresponding parameter name.
* Remove redundant get() calls on smart pointers.
* Prefer using "override" or "final" instead of "virtual". Remove "virtual" where appropriate.
This was in the first high level ARC instruction proposal, but I have not needed
it until now. The use case for this is to ahandle strong_retain_unowned (which
takes in an unowned value, asserts it is still alive, performs a strong_retain,
and returns the @owned value). This @owned value needs a destroy_value.
rdar://29671437
This simplifies the SILType substitution APIs and brings them in line with Doug and Slava's refactorings to improve AST-level type substitution. NFC intended.
Applying nontrivial generic arguments to a nontrivial SIL layout requires lowered SILType substitution, which requires a SILModule. NFC yet, just an API change.
The purpose of this change is to test if the new mangling is equivalent to the old mangling.
Both mangling strings are created, de-mangled and checked if the de-mangle trees are equivalent.
This is a hidden option. It should be used like: -assume-single-threaded
When this function is provided, the compiler assumes that the code will be executed in the single threaded mode. It then performs certain optimizations that can benefit from it, e.g. it marks as non-atomic all reference counting instructions in the user code being compiled.
There's no longer a single element type to speak of. Update uses to either iterate all box fields or to assert that they're working with a single-field box.
AllocBoxToStack should only have to deal with one-element boxes for local variables, and capture promotion will need reworking for box-based closure representation.
This was already done for getSuccessorBlocks() to distinguish getting successor
blocks from getting the full list of SILSuccessors via getSuccessors(). This
commit just makes all of the successor/predecessor code follow that naming
convention.
Some examples:
getSingleSuccessor() => getSingleSuccessorBlock().
isSuccessor() => isSuccessorBlock().
getPreds() => getPredecessorBlocks().
Really, IMO, we should consider renaming SILSuccessor to a more verbose name so
that it is clear that it is more of an internal detail of SILBasicBlock's
implementation rather than something that one should consider as apart of one's
mental model of the IR when one really wants to be thinking about predecessor
and successor blocks. But that is not what this commit is trying to change, it
is just trying to eliminate a bit of technical debt by making the naming
conventions here consistent.
