This is necessary for correctly dealing with non-standard
ownership conventions in secondary positions, and it should
also help with non-injective type imports (like BOOL/_Bool).
But right now we aren't doing much with it.
Swift SVN r26954
Previously some parts of the compiler referred to them as "fields",
and most referred to them as "elements". Use the more generic 'elements'
nomenclature because that's what we refer to other things in the compiler
(e.g. the elements of a bracestmt).
At the same time, make the API better by providing "getElement" consistently
and using it, instead of getElements()[i].
NFC.
Swift SVN r26894
Remove the semantic restrictions that prohibited extensions of
protocol types, and start making some systematic changes so that
protocol extensions start to make sense:
- Replace a lot of occurrences of isa<ProtocolDecl> and
dyn_cast<ProtocolDecl> on DeclContexts to use the new
DeclContext::isProtocolOrProtocolExtensionContext(), where we want
that behavior to apply equally to protocols and protocol extensions.
- Eliminate ProtocolDecl::getSelf() in favor of
DeclContext::getProtocolSelf(), which produces the appropriate
generic type parameter for the 'Self' of a protocol or protocol
extension. Update all of the callers of ProtocolDecl::getSelf()
appropriately.
- Update extension validation to appropriately form generic
parameter lists for protocol extensions.
- Methods in protocol extensions always use the witnesscc calling
convention.
At this point, we can type check and SILGen very basic definitions of
protocol extensions with methods that can call protocol requirements,
generic free functions, and other methods within the same protocol
extension.
Regresses four compiler crashers but improves three compiler
crashers... we'll call that "progress"; the four regressions all hit
the same assertion in the constraint system that will likely be
addressed as protocol extensions starts working.
Swift SVN r26579
We no longer need or use it since we can always refer to the same bit on
the applied function when deciding whether to inline during mandatory
inlining.
Resolves rdar://problem/19478366.
Swift SVN r26534
The string version of r26479. There's a lot of backstory and justification
there, so just read that commit message again. The one addition for String
is that global NSString constants are loaded as String as well, so that
also has to go through the bridging code even though there's no function
call involved.
Finishes rdar://problem/19734621.
Swift SVN r26510
...and similar for NSDictionary and NSSet.
For APIs that don't have a reason to distinguish "empty" and "absent" cases,
we encourage standardizing on "empty" and marking the result as non-optional
(or in Objective-C, __nonnull). However, there are system APIs whose
implementations currently do return nil rather than an empty collection
instance. In these cases, we recommend /changing/ the API to return the
appropriate "empty" value instead.
However, this can cause problems for backwards-deployment: while the API is
truly non-optional on system vN, a program may encounter a nil return value
if run on system vN-1. Objective-C can generally deal with this (especially
if the only thing you do is ask for the count or try to iterate over the
collection) but Swift can't. Therefore, we've decided to "play nice" and
accept nil return values for the collection types (NSArray, NSDictionary,
and NSSet) and implicitly treat them as "empty" values if they are the
result of an imported function or method.
Note that the current implementation has a hole regarding subscript getters,
since we still make an AST-level thunk for these in the Clang importer.
We can probably get rid of those these days, but I didn't want to touch
them at this point. It seems unlikely that there will be a subscript that
(a) is for a collection type, and (b) mistakenly returned nil in the past
rather than an empty collection.
There's another hole where an ObjC client calls one of these mistakenly-nil-
returning methods and then immediately hands the result off by calling a
Swift method. However, we have to draw the line somewhere.
(We're actually going to do this for strings as well; coming soon.)
rdar://problem/19734621
Swift SVN r26479
This change permits SILGen to make smarter decisions about
block placement by keeping related blocks together instead
of always inserting to the end to the function. The
flipside is that SILGen needs to be somewhat careful to
create blocks in the right order. Counter-intuitively,
that order is the reverse of the order in which the blocks
should be laid out, since blocks created later will be
inserted before blocks created earlier. Note, however,
that this produces the right results for recursive
emission.
To that end, adjust a couple of places in SILGen to
create blocks in properly nested order.
All of the block-order differences in the tests seem
to be desirable; several of them even had confused
comments wondering how on earth a block got injected
where it did.
Also, fix the implementation of SILBuilder::moveBlockTo,
and fix a latent bug in epilogue emission where epilogBB
was erased from its parent (deleting it) and then
queried multiple times (!).
Swift SVN r26428
This patch also introduces some SILGen infrastructure for
dividing the function into "ordinary" and "postmatter"
sections, with error-handling-like stuff going into the
final section. Currently, this is largely undermined by
SILBuilder, but I'm going to fix that in a follow-up.
Swift SVN r26422
Leave a cleanup to deinit the container after the uniquely-referenced opaque value is taken out of it. While we're here, stub out support for boxed existentials (though we can't test it since _ErrorType doesn't have any Self-returning methods, and we currently only produce OpenExistentialExprs in the AST for method calls involving covariant Self or metatypes).
Swift SVN r26284
Previously, a multi-pattern var/let decl like:
var x = 4, y = 17
would produce two pattern binding decls (one for x=4 one for y=17). This is convenient
in some ways, but is bad for source reproducibility from the ASTs (see, e.g. the improvements
in test/IDE/structure.swift and test/decl/inherit/initializer.swift).
The hardest part of this change was to get parseDeclVar to set up the AST in a way
compatible with our existing assumptions. I ended up with an approach that forms PBDs in
more erroneous cases than before. One downside of this is that we now produce a spurious
"type annotation missing in pattern"
diagnostic in some cases. I'll take care of that in a follow-on patch.
Swift SVN r26224
The deallocating parameter convention is a new convention put on a
non-trivial parameter if the caller function guarantees to the callee
that the parameter has the deallocating bit set in its object header.
This means that retains and releases do not need to be emitted on these
parameters even though they are non-trivial. This helps to solve a bug
in +0 self and makes it trivial for the optimizer to perform
optimizations based on this property.
It is not emitted yet by SILGen and will only be put on the self
argument of Deallocator functions.
Swift SVN r26179
- Rename getParentPattern() -> getParentPatternBinding(), since
it returns the pattern binding, not the pattern.
- Introduce new getParentPattern()/getParentInitializer() methods,
covering the most common uses of getParentPatternBinding().
NFC.
Swift SVN r26175
John points out that we would still need to evaluate default arguments in an ignored context, and these cases aren't important to fixing the bug.
Swift SVN r26108
For better consistency with other address-only instruction variants, and to open the door to new exciting existential representations (such as a refcounted boxed representation for ErrorType).
Swift SVN r25902
Turns out llvm::DataLayoutPass is used in other places, so the bots are still unhappy.
Re-applying the original change so we can fix the problem holistically.
Swift SVN r25761
This is breaking the testing bot because DataLayoutPass was just removed from LLVM trunk.
Chris is the best one to fix this change, but we need to get the bots green.
Swift SVN r25760
- Have Sema, not SILGen decide if a vardecl can be captured by address
instead of by-box. This is a non-local property that is best computed
during capture set formation. Sema captures this as a bit on the new
CapturedValue entry.
- Rework some diagnostic emission to centralize a class of noescape
diagnostics in capture set calculation. Previously, funcdecl closures
produced their diagnostics there, but ClosureExprs produced them in
MiscDiagnostics (NFC for this part).
This fixes <rdar://problem/19981118> Swift 1.2 beta 2: Closures nested in @noescape closures copy, rather than reference, captured vars.
Swift SVN r25759
when computing the list. This simplifies getLocalCaptures to *just* filter out
global captures, and paves the way for other enhancements. NFC.
Swift SVN r25739
...rather than just assuming any initializer without a body that makes it
to SILGen is a memberwise initializer.
In the long term we want SILGen to stop handling these initializers, at
which point we can see if it makes sense to remove this body kind.
No intended functionality change.
Swift SVN r25723
If we have a C function pointer conversion, generate a thunk using the same logic we use for ObjC method thunks, and emit a pointer to that thunk as the C function pointer value. (This works for nongeneric, nonmember functions; generics will additionally need to apply generic parameters within the thunks. Static functions would need to gather the metatype as well.)
Swift SVN r25653
If a non-static 'let' field in a struct has an initializer, its implicitly generated
memberwise initializer should not override that. Handle this by having the memberwise initializer
and default initializer use the initial value of the property instead of an argument to the init.
This would have been a lot easier if sema was synthesizing the ctor bodies instead of SILGen,
but here it is. The missing case is narrow (let (x,y) = (1,2)) and for now we just disable
implicit synthesization of the incorrect case.
Swift SVN r25424
This is also useful in general SIL passes when generating thunks. I am going to
use this in function signature optimization and closure specialization.
Swift SVN r25356
This adds the -profile-generate flag, which enables LLVM's
instrumentation based profiling. It implements the instrumentation
for basic control flow, such as if statements, loops, and closures.
Swift SVN r25155
If a grandchild class inherits a thunked override from the child class, use that thunk in the grandchild vtable too. Should round out the fix for rdar://problem/19321484.
Swift SVN r24735
the call instead of during the formal evaluation of the argument.
This is the last major chunk of the semantic changes proposed
in the accessors document. It has two purposes, both related
to the fact that it shortens the duration of the formal access.
First, the change isolates later evaluations (as long as they
precede the call) from the formal access, preventing them from
spuriously seeing unspecified behavior. For example::
foo(&array[0], bar(array))
Here the value passed to bar is a proper copy of 'array',
and if bar() decides to stash it aside, any modifications
to 'array[0]' made by foo() will not spontaneously appear
in the copy. (In contrast, if something caused a copy of
'array' during foo()'s execution, that copy would violate
our formal access rules and would therefore be allowed to
have an arbitrary value at index 0.)
Second, when a mutating access uses a pinning addressor, the
change limits the amount of arbitrary code that falls between
the pin and unpin. For example::
array[0] += countNodes(subtree)
Previously, we would begin the access to array[0] before the
call to countNodes(). To eliminate the pin and unpin, the
optimizer would have needed to prove that countNodes didn't
access the same array. With this change, the call is evaluated
first, and the access instead begins immediately before the call
to +=. Since that operator is easily inlined, it becomes
straightforward to eliminate the pin/unpin.
A number of other changes got bundled up with this in ways that
are hard to tease apart. In particular:
- RValueSource is now ArgumentSource and can now store LValues.
- It is now illegal to use emitRValue to emit an l-value.
- Call argument emission is now smart enough to emit tuple
shuffles itself, applying abstraction patterns in reverse
through the shuffle. It also evaluates varargs elements
directly into the array.
- AllowPlusZero has been split in two. AllowImmediatePlusZero
is useful when you are going to immediately consume the value;
this is good enough to avoid copies/retains when reading a 'var'.
AllowGuaranteedPlusZero is useful when you need a stronger
guarantee, e.g. when arbitrary code might intervene between
evaluation and use; it's still good enough to avoid copies
from a 'let'. The upshot is that we're now a lot smarter
about generally avoiding retains on lets, but we've also
gotten properly paranoid about calling non-mutating methods
on vars.
(Note that you can't necessarily avoid a copy when passing
something in a var to an @in_guaranteed parameter! You
first have to prove that nothing can assign to the var during
the call. That should be easy as long as the var hasn't
escaped, but that does need to be proven first, so we can't
do it in SILGen.)
Swift SVN r24709
If a subclass overrides methods with variance in the optionality of non-class-type members, emit a thunk to handle wrapping more optional parameters or results and force-unwrapping any IUO parameters made non-optional in the derived. For this to be useful, we need IRGen to finally pay attention to SILVTables, but this is a step on the way to fixing rdar://problem/19321484.
Swift SVN r24705
Fixes a crash where we tried to natively vtable dispatch these methods, even when they were in extensions, causing the crash in rdar://problem/18088026.
Swift SVN r24619
Rather than keeping just a "main class" in every module, track the "main file"
that's responsible for producing the module's entry point. This covers both
main source files and files containing classes marked @UIApplicationMain or
@NSApplicationMain.
This should have no functionality change, but is preparation for the next
commit, where we will preserve some of this information in serialization.
Swift SVN r24529
