When serializing cross-references to a (private) module that is
re-exported through another (public) module, record the
cross-reference as if the entity were found in named public module.
Finishes rdar://problem/34438586.
The base mutability of storage is part of the signature, so be sure
to compute that during validation. Also, serialize it as part of
the storage declaration, and fix some places that synthesize
declarations to set it correctly.
The “inherited” types of an associated type are only needed to
type-check an associated type in the context of its protocol.
Once that is complete, the requirement signature of the protocol
is the “truth”, and we no longer rely on the “inherited” types.
Stop serializing them.
The etymology of these terms isn't about race, but "black" = "blocked"
and "white" = "allowed" isn't really a good look these days. In most
cases we weren't using these terms particularly precisely anyway, so
the rephrasing is actually an improvement.
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
Rename AccessibilityAttr to AccessControlAttr and
SetterAccessibilityAttr to SetterAccessAttr, then track down the last
few uses of "accessibility" that don't have to do with
NSAccessibility. (I left the SourceKit XPC API alone because that's
supposed to be more stable.)
"Accessibility" has a different meaning for app developers, so we've
already deliberately excised it from our diagnostics in favor of terms
like "access control" and "access level". Do the same in the compiler
now that we aren't constantly pulling things into the release branch.
This commit changes the 'Accessibility' enum to be named 'AccessLevel'.
Pushes __consuming through the frontend and extends existing
attribute-based diagnsotics to cover it. Unlike `nonmutating`,
__consuming is allowed in class methods, though it makes little
sense to put it there.
This commit contains:
-) adding the new instructions + infrastructure, like parsing, printing, etc.
-) support in IRGen to generate global object-variables (i.e. "heap" objects) which are statically initialized in the data section.
-) IRGen for global_value which lazily initializes the object header and returns a reference to the object.
For details see the documentation of the new instructions in SIL.rst.
The number was limited to 3 attributes for some reason. Now a SILFunction may have up to 2^16 such attributes, which should be enough for a while ;-)
Fixes rdar://problem/34026325
Remove the cast consumption kind from all unconditional casts. It
doesn't make sense for unconditional casts, complicates SIL ownership,
and wasn't fully supported for all variants. Copies should be
explicit.
Consider a class hierarchy like the following:
class Base {
func m1() {}
func m2() {}
}
class Derived : Base {
override func m2() {}
func m3() {}
}
The SIL vtable for 'Derived' now records that the entry for m1
is inherited, the entry for m2 is an override, and the entry
for m3 is a new entry:
sil_vtable Derived {
#Base.m1!1: (Base) -> () -> () : _T01a4BaseC2m1yyF [inherited]
#Base.m2!1: (Base) -> () -> () : _T01a7DerivedC2m2yyF [override]
#Derived.m3!1: (Derived) -> () -> () : _T01a7DerivedC2m3yyF
}
This additional information will allow IRGen to emit the vtable
for Derived resiliently, without referencing the symbol for
the inherited method m1() directly.
This shows up with swift_wrapper typedefs, which get imported into
Swift as structs. If someone makes an extension of a swift_wrapper
type, but the swift_wrapper is only applied in Swift 4 mode, that
extension will break any Swift 3 clients. Recover by just dropping
the extension entirely.
There's still more complexity around extensions---what if a
requirement can't be deserialized? what if something's depending on
the protocol conformance provided by the extension?---but the missing
base type case should be pretty safe. If you can't see the type at
all, things that depend on its conformances are already in trouble.
rdar://problem/33636733
* Generate libSyntax API
This patch removes the hand-rolled libSyntax API and replaces it with an
API that's entirely automatically generated. This means the API is
guaranteed to be internally stylistically and functionally consistent.
Inheritance of a protocol from JavaScriptCore's JSExport protocol is
used to indicate that the methods and properties of that protocol
should be exported to JavaScript. The actual check to determine
whether a protocol (directly) inherits JSExport is performed via the
Objective-C runtime. Note that the presence of JSExport in the
protocol hierarchy is not sufficient; the protocol must directly
inherit JSExport.
Swift warns about redundant conformance requirements and eliminates
them from the requirement signature (and, therefore, the Objective-C
metadata). This behavior is incorrect for JSExport, because the
conformance is actually needed for this API to work properly.
Recognize a protocol's inheritance JSExport specifically (by
name) when computing the requirement signature of the protocol. When
we find such a redundancy, suppress the "redundant conformance
constraint" diagnostic and add a new (hidden) attribute
@_restatedObjCConformance(proto). The attribute is used only by Objective-C
protocol metadata emission to ensure that we get the expected metadata
in the Objective-C runtime.
Fixes rdar://problem/32674145.
When there's an Objective-C protocol that adopts other protocols, the
other protocols become part of the requirement signature. If that can
change, Swift conformances to that protocol will get very confused
when it comes time to deserialize the conformances that satisfy the
requirement signature.
To recover from this, just deserialize /all/ trailing conformances,
rather than follow the requirement signature, and match them up after
the fact. (This only works for Objective-C protocols where we know all
conformance requirements represent inherited protocols, as opposed to
constraints on associated types.)
rdar://problem/33356098
Also, begin to pass around base types instead of raw InOutType types. Ideally, only Sema needs to deal with them, but this means that a bunch of callers need to unwrap any inouts that might still be lying around before forming these types.
Multiple parts of the compiler were slicing, dicing, or just dropping these flags. Because I intend to use them for the new function type representation, I need them to be preserved all across the compiler. As a first pass, this stubs in what will eventually be structural rules as asserts and tracks down all callers of consequence to conform to the new invariants.
This is temporary.
This has the same semantics as open_existential_box, but returns an object value
instead of an address.
This is used in SIL opaque values mode. Attempting to reuse open_existential_box
in this mode causes SIL type inconsistencies that are too difficult to work
around. Adding this instruction allows for consistent handling of opaque values.
The original versions of several of these currently redundant instructions will
be removed once the SIL representation stabilizes.
These instructions have the same semantics as the *ExistentialAddr instructions
but operate directly on the existential value, not its address.
This is in preparation for adding ExistentialBoxValue instructions.
The previous name would cause impossible confusion with "opaque existentials"
and "opaque existential boxes".
We use this to avoid circularity issues in serialization; we'd like to
extend that to the Clang importer. This is only necessary because we
can't look up a single member at a time, but it can still fix issues
in the short term.
This commit should have no effect on functionality.
Special DeclNames represent names that do not have an identifier in the
surface language. This implies serializing the information about whether
a name is special together with its identifier (if it is not special)
in both the module file and the swift lookup table.
Using these in declaration position has been deprecated and
removed in Swift 3. These attributes were not being parsed and
contained deadweight diagnostics that should have been moved
when these attributes became type attributes.
In anticipation of future attributes, and perhaps the ability to
declare lvalues with specifiers other than 'let' and 'var', expand
the "isLet" bit into a more general "specifier" field.
The outside representation already went to a flat set of requirements;
make the internal representation match so we aren't tempted to use the
requirement signature as inputs to a generic signature.